here, there, everywhere, and nowhere

[AntonioLao]

A photon here and a photon there will be identical except for their energy content. This energy differences are enough to form the global symmetry of energy density distribution of the physical universe. An electron here and an electron there will be identical except for their spin orientation. However, all the spin-up and spin-down electrons are not enough to form the symmetry of matter density distribution of the same physical universe. In addition, since electrons possess electric charge, the symmetry of electric charge density distribution will appear loft sided. By conventional agreement, electron is negatively charged. So, the question is where are all the positively charged electrons? Nevertheless, nature provides its own solutions. But instead of arriving at simplicity, these solutions move toward more complexity. Nature introduces in addition to electric charge, the reality of color charge. Whereas the electric charge has two states: positive and negative. The Color charge has three states and for lack of better descriptive words these are called red, green, and blue. The permutation and combination of these give 8 distinct colored quanta called gluons. But these did not stop the spread of complexity. Quirky nature supplies further complications by introducing quarks. Although electrons possess only electric charge and gluons possess only color charge, the quarks possess both electric and color charge. Moreover, the electric charge of quark takes only fractional values of 1/3 and 2/3. As mediators between color and electric, quarks seem to restore the global symmetry of matter density distribution by creating protons, neutrons forming neutral states of atoms with the electrons. However, the local symmetry remains disturbing since chaotic nature provides one lasting piece of jigsaw puzzle unsuitable for achieving complete perfect symmetry but inadvertently as the existence of renegade one-arm left-handed neutrinos possessing no color or electric charge eternally searching for their long lost right-handed partners.

[Guille]

This is a beautifull sequence connecting most of our quantums.

Now, I'm not exactly sure but I think there are the same number of quarks with 1/3 electric charge than quarks with 2/3 electric charge (3 for each). If we have two particles each with one of the three of a familly, then particle G would have 1/3+1/3+1/3=3/9 and particle B would have 2/3+2/3+2/3=6/9. Then a particle with 1 particle G and 1 particle B would have 1 negative electric charge.

I believe that particle G is teh graviton and B is the magnetic monopole (both theoretically known but not empirically). And further I believe the particle sum of these two is the Electron when it has the speed of light. But as it doesn't, then it is made simply of parts of the gravitons it interacts with and part of the magnetic monopoles. It has to be more worked out, but it could explain some fundamental things (why magnetic fields come out from changing electric fields, why the mass of an elecron is the size it is compare to a proton's and how electrons can absorve and release photons.

[AntonioLao]

This is a beautifull sequence connecting most of our quantums.

I'm looking for the local symmetry that will complement the global symmetry.

[michellemfry]

Antonio, you mentioned a word that got me thinking about the concept of nowhere. Is it analogous to the electron's behavior? There is no place of rest for the little darling, is there? Yet, it exists just the same. Is nowhere just not having a place in the fabric of spacetime, but an ever changing address of sorts in the scheme of things?
I believe this nowhere might be a real place to ponder. A permanent realm where things find themselves ever in. Is nowhere to be beyond the influence of gravity? Just as some things are beyond the grasp of mass, and are massless.
Let's look at this nowhere together. I'd love to know what you can make of it.

[AntonioLao]

Let's look at this nowhere together.

What I had in mind were the righthanded neutrinos and the antiparticles. Although the physical equations gave them just as much right to exist as ordinary matter, experimentally they can't be found and they have been searched long and hard and at taxpayers' expense.

[michellemfry]

But aren't they being looked for in places that are considered as "here" somewhere?

[AntonioLao]

But aren't they being looked for in places that are considered as "here" somewhere?

Surely, we can't go to them? The Earth environment is just such an insignifant place with respect to the entire cosmos that if I were the righthanded neutrinos or the antimatter, I certainly would not be touring this part of Earth. I think there are far more interesting places to see or to visit than we can possibly imagine speaking of the universe as a whole, binary or triple stars systems, globular clusters, etc.

[baudrunner]

Physical equations give not right, only explanation, right or wrong. It is impossible to factor in everything to derive a correct equation therefore an equation gives only the illustration of an assumption. An assumption provides only hypothesis. Mathematics or semantics doesn't prove it true. It is possible after all that what we have left over from the earliest stage of creation represents only a minuscule percentage of all the particles that came before those which make up our current reality, the result of a scenario which at one time might have seen an almost equal amount of either of the possibilities.

Think of a bar graph of two long bars very tall where the two tops are quite close in representing a total quantity and now lop off the tops to create a new illusion of proportion, where the one that was slightly longer is now exceedingly long compared to the other, making the other quantity appear negligible.

[AntonioLao]

where the one that was slightly longer is now exceedingly long compared to the other, making the other quantity appear negligible.

This is the reason why I mistrusted statistical graphs and charts. They show partially clothed truth not the whole naked truth. Hidding the beauty of many natural phenomena.

[mkirkpatrick]

This is the reason why I mistrusted statistical graphs and charts. They show partially clothed truth not the whole naked truth. Hidding the beauty of many natural phenomena.

You are absolutely spot on right there Antonio,there is indeed wondrous
majesty and beauty in natural phenomena,we want to see the full picture
not a cardboard cutout?

kind regards michael