| |
 | |
 | |
Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,008
| |
01-23-2006, 01:31 PM
| | here, there, everywhere, and nowhere
A photon here and a photon there will be identical except for their energy content. This energy differences are enough to form the global symmetry of energy density distribution of the physical universe. An electron here and an electron there will be identical except for their spin orientation. However, all the spin-up and spin-down electrons are not enough to form the symmetry of matter density distribution of the same physical universe. In addition, since electrons possess electric charge, the symmetry of electric charge density distribution will appear loft sided. By conventional agreement, electron is negatively charged. So, the question is where are all the positively charged electrons? Nevertheless, nature provides its own solutions. But instead of arriving at simplicity, these solutions move toward more complexity. Nature introduces in addition to electric charge, the reality of color charge. Whereas the electric charge has two states: positive and negative. The Color charge has three states and for lack of better descriptive words these are called red, green, and blue. The permutation and combination of these give 8 distinct colored quanta called gluons. But these did not stop the spread of complexity. Quirky nature supplies further complications by introducing quarks. Although electrons possess only electric charge and gluons possess only color charge, the quarks possess both electric and color charge. Moreover, the electric charge of quark takes only fractional values of 1/3 and 2/3. As mediators between color and electric, quarks seem to restore the global symmetry of matter density distribution by creating protons, neutrons forming neutral states of atoms with the electrons. However, the local symmetry remains disturbing since chaotic nature provides one lasting piece of jigsaw puzzle unsuitable for achieving complete perfect symmetry but inadvertently as the existence of renegade one-arm left-handed neutrinos possessing no color or electric charge eternally searching for their long lost right-handed partners.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | The Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,278
48  | |
01-23-2006, 05:44 PM
| | This is a beautifull sequence connecting most of our quantums.
Now, I'm not exactly sure but I think there are the same number of quarks with 1/3 electric charge than quarks with 2/3 electric charge (3 for each). If we have two particles each with one of the three of a familly, then particle G would have 1/3+1/3+1/3=3/9 and particle B would have 2/3+2/3+2/3=6/9. Then a particle with 1 particle G and 1 particle B would have 1 negative electric charge.
I believe that particle G is teh graviton and B is the magnetic monopole (both theoretically known but not empirically). And further I believe the particle sum of these two is the Electron when it has the speed of light. But as it doesn't, then it is made simply of parts of the gravitons it interacts with and part of the magnetic monopoles. It has to be more worked out, but it could explain some fundamental things (why magnetic fields come out from changing electric fields, why the mass of an elecron is the size it is compare to a proton's and how electrons can absorve and release photons.  | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,008
| |
01-23-2006, 10:39 PM
| | symmetry is the key
Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE This is a beautifull sequence connecting most of our quantums. | I'm looking for the local symmetry that will complement the global symmetry.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Master
Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 620
18 | |
01-30-2006, 02:10 PM
|  Where exactly is Nowhere?
Antonio, you mentioned a word that got me thinking about the concept of nowhere. Is it analogous to the electron's behavior? There is no place of rest for the little darling, is there? Yet, it exists just the same. Is nowhere just not having a place in the fabric of spacetime, but an ever changing address of sorts in the scheme of things?
I believe this nowhere might be a real place to ponder. A permanent realm where things find themselves ever in. Is nowhere to be beyond the influence of gravity? Just as some things are beyond the grasp of mass, and are massless.
Let's look at this nowhere together. I'd love to know what you can make of it.
__________________
Michelle | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,008
| |
01-30-2006, 02:29 PM
| | rigth-handed neutrinos and antiparticles
Quote: |
Originally Posted by michellemfry Let's look at this nowhere together. | What I had in mind were the righthanded neutrinos and the antiparticles. Although the physical equations gave them just as much right to exist as ordinary matter, experimentally they can't be found and they have been searched long and hard and at taxpayers' expense.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Master
Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 620
18 | |
01-30-2006, 02:32 PM
| | But aren't they being looked for in places that are considered as "here" somewhere?
__________________
Michelle | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,008
| |
01-30-2006, 02:58 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by michellemfry But aren't they being looked for in places that are considered as "here" somewhere? | Surely, we can't go to them? The Earth environment is just such an insignifant place with respect to the entire cosmos that if I were the righthanded neutrinos or the antimatter, I certainly would not be touring this part of Earth. I think there are far more interesting places to see or to visit than we can possibly imagine speaking of the universe as a whole, binary or triple stars systems, globular clusters, etc.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | 4th degree Black Belt
Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 587
18 | |
01-31-2006, 07:45 PM
| | lopping off the top
Physical equations give not right, only explanation, right or wrong. It is impossible to factor in everything to derive a correct equation therefore an equation gives only the illustration of an assumption. An assumption provides only hypothesis. Mathematics or semantics doesn't prove it true. It is possible after all that what we have left over from the earliest stage of creation represents only a minuscule percentage of all the particles that came before those which make up our current reality, the result of a scenario which at one time might have seen an almost equal amount of either of the possibilities.
Think of a bar graph of two long bars very tall where the two tops are quite close in representing a total quantity and now lop off the tops to create a new illusion of proportion, where the one that was slightly longer is now exceedingly long compared to the other, making the other quantity appear negligible.
__________________  "There is nothing permanent except change"
Last edited by baudrunner; 01-31-2006 at 07:49 PM.
Reason: content
| | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,008
| |
02-01-2006, 02:08 PM
| | statistics
Quote: |
Originally Posted by baudrunner where the one that was slightly longer is now exceedingly long compared to the other, making the other quantity appear negligible. | This is the reason why I mistrusted statistical graphs and charts. They show partially clothed truth not the whole naked truth. Hidding the beauty of many natural phenomena.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,703
| |
07-12-2006, 09:12 PM
|  Re: statistics
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao This is the reason why I mistrusted statistical graphs and charts. They show partially clothed truth not the whole naked truth. Hidding the beauty of many natural phenomena. | You are absolutely spot on right there Antonio,there is indeed wondrous
majesty and beauty in natural phenomena,we want to see the full picture
not a cardboard cutout?
kind regards michael
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 
VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.
| |
