[socratus]

About Reference Systems: Vacuum and Space.
From times of Newton in classical physics the principle worked:

" Until the reference system is specified, any conversations on movement are completely deprived the contents."

Newton, first of all physicists realized, what a main role a reference system has. The choice of reference system is a central, basic question at the commencement of any task But the founders of the “Big Bang” theory have forgotten this. Nowhere do they write in what reference system the "Big Bang" took place, and in what reference system the substance of the "single point " is distributed. And consequently, the theory of the "Big Bang" is constructed on a sand.

* * *

The astronomers have established the fact of galaxy rotation but nobody speaks of the reference system in which they rotate. Without the inclusion of a reference system the rotation of galaxies is deprived of any content. To avoid this problem, write:

Each Galaxy is surrounded by an "accompanying reference system", and the "accompanying reference system" is extended.
/ The Physics of Space. is a small Soviet encyclopedia published in 1986./

This is a joke!

For example, I am at home and I am surrounded by an "accompanying reference system"; my house. Then I go to work surrounded by an "accompanying reference system"; And when I have arrived on the job, I am surrounded by an "accompanying reference system", the university. But if we do not understand that we work in the reference system of the Earth, and the astronomers do not understand in what reference system the billions of galaxies rotate, any statement is meaningless. Only when the reference system is specified, then the words "galaxies rotate" and "Big Bang" make sense.

The first problem in the discussion of the laws of motion is to answer the question, "In what reference system does this motion occur? In what reference system are the laws of motion formulated?" This question is most unpleasant for the amateurs in abstract reasoning and conjecture.

God teaches man to think particularly and logically. The Devil teaches man to speak with beautiful, general and abstract phrases. By such method he easily hides the truth from the people.

* * *

The main paradox in physics is not understanding reference systems. Einstein and Infeld wrote: “We have the laws, but are not aware what the body of reference system they belong to, and all our physical construction appears erected on sand”. They are right. The essence is that now there is no precise border which divides two different frame of reference:

1) System of Vacuum and
2) Gravitational frame of reference.

Now these two systems are considered as though they were common. But they are completely different systems. There, where there is a vacuum - there is no gravitation.
In the vacuum, one set of laws - the laws of the vacuum work(not taking into account external influences). Where there is gravitation, there is no vacuum. In a gravitational reference system a complete set of other laws apply. These laws are connected and take into account external influences.How these two systems cooperate between themselves is explained on the following site.

[socratus]

The Structure of Nothing . According to my peasant logic: 1 + 1 = 2.

Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter(all elementary particles and all quarks and their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks, all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational, muons… gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a “single point”. It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the “single point”.
EMPTINESS- NOTHING….???Ok! But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms? I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition by the formula T=0K.

* * *

Once there was a “Big Bang”.But in what space had the Big Bang taken place and in what space was the matter of the Big Bang distributed? Not in T=0K? It is clear, that there is only EMPTINESS, NOTHING, in T=0K. Now consider that the Universe, as an absolute frame of reference is in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests in relic radiation of the Big Bang ). But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change and decrease. What temperature can this radiation reach? Not T=0K? Hence, if we go into the past or into the present or into the future, we can not escape from EMPTINESS- NOTHING .

Everyone knows about the “singular point”, but nobody knows that it is EMPTINESS- NOTHING! To understand it, it is necessary to ask a question: What geometric and physical parameters can particles have in T=0K? Can they have a volume? No. Then they must have the geometrical form of a flat circle: C/D =p= 3,14.
But what these particles do ? Nothing. They are in a condition of rest: h = 0. So, maybe they are dead? In order to answer of this question, it is necessary to more clearly understand EMPTINESS- NOTHING.

* * *

Has this EMPTINESS- NOTHING a border? No! It has no borders. EMPTINESS- NOTHING is indefinite. Let's identify it by the formula: T=0K = ∞ And what about time in the EMPTINESS- NOTHING ? Independent time is absent. Time in EMPTINESS- NOTHING is indissolubly merged with infinite space. Stop! But you see, such space is described by Einstein in Special Relativity Theory. In SRT, space also has a negative characteristic and there also, time is indissolubly merged with space.Only in SRT, this EMPTINESS- NOTHING has another name: Negative four-dimensional (Minkowski) space. Then it is possible to conclude that SRT describes the behaviour of the circle-particles in T=0K.

* * *

In agreement with SRT, these circle-particles can be in two conditions of movement: To fly rectilinearly with a speed of c =1. In this kind of movement , it is named a “quantum of light”, ”photon”.2) To rotate around its own diameter and then its form and physical parameters will change according to the Lorentz transformation. In this kind of movement, it is named the “electron”.

* * *

But what is the reason for the movement of circle-particles? In the EMPTINESS- NOTHING, nothing can influence the condition of rest. Quantum theory gives the answer to this question.

1) The rectilinear movement of the circle-particles depends on Planck's spin :h = 1.
2) The rotary movement of the circle-particles depends on the spin of Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck: ħ = h / 2p.

* * *

Very strange particles surround the "singular point ".These circle-particles can be in three conditions:

1) h = 0 ,
2) h = 1,
3) ) ħ = h / 2p

And they can independently decide what action to take. So it can work only with particles that have their own consciousness, which is not static but can develop.
The development of consciousness scale goes " from vague wishes up to a clear thought ".

* * *

Best regards.
Socratus.

http://www.socratus.com

"If consciousness is in fact defined (and different) at every moment of time,

it should also be related to points in space:

the truly subjective observer system should be related to space-time points."

from "Quantum Theory and Time Asymmetry", Zeh (1979).

[socratus]

Infinity: a symbol or reality.

1. Everyone knows, that absolute temperature T=0K cannot be reached.We can only indefinitely come nearer to her.
2. Everyone knows, that nobody can reach absolute speed of quantum of light c=1. We can only indefinitely come nearer to her.
3. But everyone also knows, that only quantum of light goes with
absolute speed c=1. It is the fact, it is a reality.

Question: Unless can this absolute movement c=1 occur in relative reference frame ?
Answer: No.!

The absolute movement can occur only in absolute frame of reference.
But only one absolute frame of reference is known T=0K(which is impossible to reach). And only in her quantum of light can move with the absolute speed c=1. And it is also reality. But what can tell quantum of light about his travel in the parallel world?

[socratus]

Two views of the Vacuum

In modern science there are two mutually exclusive points of view

on the behaviour of particles in a Vacuum. One point of view is

the position of classical physics which says that:

In the vacuum at T=0K any movement of a particle stops.
And if in the Empire of Cold there is no movement, it is a dead empire.

But another point of view completely rejects this formulation.

This point of view is expressed in the quantum theory. In 1911, M. Planck

stated that energy does not become zero at the approach T=0K.

He declared this on the 1st Solvay congress. So " Energy at T=0K" became

the main problem in physics because " Physics is first of all the vacuum".

Gradually it began to appear that Vacuum at T=0K is not empty dead space.

There live the "virtual" particles. These particles originally have negative and

imaginary mass, and then make a virtual transition » to positive mass,

becoming real particles. But the apparently mystical "virtual particles"

as they make "virtual transitions". explains little.

Let's rethink these "virtual" particles. Let's ask a question:

What is the geometrical form of "virtual" particles in the Vacuum at T=0K?

The answer is:

According to the laws of physics :

J. Charles ( 1787), Gay-Lussac ( 1802), V. Nernst ( 1910), A. Einstein ( 1925)
particles in a Vacuum cannot have volume and consequently should be flat figures.

This means, particles have the geometrical form of a circle, as from all flat figures

the circle has the most optimum form: C/D=pi.

What are these "virtual" circles in the vacuum?

The answer is given in the theory of radiation of absolute black bodies.

The theory considers an area of the space which are in absolute thermal balance.

It is possible only at T=0K. But it is known, that such a condition is a

"thermal death " and is not observed in nature. Therefore Planck, studying this area,

came to the conclusion that condition T=0K has changed. In this space there should be

a radiation of a quantum of light, possessing an internal impulse h=Et=1.

So, « the virtual circle » is transformed to quantum of light.

This quantum of light has an impulse h=Et=1 and travels with constant speed, c=1.

From this assumption Quantum theory was born.

Therefore the Quantum theory is a theory only about a quantum of light and its various transformations.

And classical theory considers all other particles.

These particles have mass much greater than a quantum of light and

move with much smaller speeds. If we understand the difference between

a quantum of light and all other particles,

then all contradictions in the physics disappear, and all of physics becomes a

harmoniously integral science.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by socratus

Infinity: a symbol or reality.

1. Everyone knows, that absolute temperature T=0K cannot be reached.We can only indefinitely come nearer to her.
2. Everyone knows, that nobody can reach absolute speed of quantum of light c=1. We can only indefinitely come nearer to her.
3. But everyone also knows, that only quantum of light goes with
absolute speed c=1. It is the fact, it is a reality.

Question: Unless can this absolute movement c=1 occur in relative reference frame ?
Answer: No.!

The absolute movement can occur only in absolute frame of reference.
But only one absolute frame of reference is known T=0K(which is impossible to reach). And only in her quantum of light can move with the absolute speed c=1. And it is also reality. But what can tell quantum of light about his travel in the parallel world?

Is a circle nothing.or a doorway,portal, into another dimension,do you know the answer?
kind regards michael.

[socratus]

The Antiworld. Its Inhabitants and the Quantum of Light

Physicists have found antiparticles. If antiparticles exist, then an antiworld exists.

What does this antiworld look like? What do its citizens do?

In the book “Evolution of Physics” Einstein and Infeld wrote:

“We have the laws, but are not aware what the body of reference system they belong to,

and all our physical construction appears erected on sand”.

They are right.

1) We know the laws and formulas of ideal gas, but do not know

to what system of counting they belong to.

A clever man, G. Gamov wrote: :

”In the case of an ideal gas formed by point- molecules, which of course does not exist in nature... ”

This is funny. The formulas and laws are just, but the particles that create them are absent.

This is mysticism! The one that doesn’t exist is created by reality.

2) We know the laws and formulas of SRT but do not know

what negative four-dimensional space looks like.

3) Quantum physics confirms that real particles are born

from virtual particles in the vacuum. But nobody explains what the vacuum is.

To say that the vacuum possesses the lowest energetic state

is the same as to say: “a dead man possesses the lowest energetic state”.

To say that gravitation does not disappear but only infinitely approaches to zero

is the same as to say: “we do not die, only approach death”.

But our cemeteries speak quite differently.

They say: “Death is real”. However, the physicists do not want to acknowledge

The Law of Death; this real fact.

How can we understand Reality ignoring this evident fact.

But if antiworld exists, how can we perceive it? How can we interact with it?

In order to tear out from the embrace of Earth, the rocket needs to develop the speed

of 11,2 km/sec. And in order to travel in an antiworld, one needs to fly

with the speed of the quantum of light.

But nobody except the quantum of light possesses such a speed.

It is the only thing that can visit the antiworld.

What can the quantum of light tell us about antiworld (parallel Universe)?

[harmonygirl]

Just one parallel Universe?

[socratus]

"Formulas are cleverer than people"
/ H. Hertz ./

[socratus]

XVII c- the thermodynamics was created.
XVIII c - the mechanics dominated.
XIX c - electrodynamics was developed.
XX c - the power of atom has been opened.
XXI c - the importance of Vacuum is clear.

(I hope it will be clear.)
* * *

Physics is the first of all Vacuum.

The physics begins from T=0K.



The philosophy of science begins from T=0K.

The religion begins from T=0K.

The origin of Existence begins from T=0K.