Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 37 of 37
  1. #31
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,611
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    294
    Thanked 893x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: black hole predicament

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    I dont have the slightest idea. To be honest, I dont believe in black holes.

    I tend to think they exist,although the name leaves much to be desired?

    Prehaps a universal safety valve would be more appropriate? USV.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  2. #32
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: black hole predicament

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    I tend to think they exist,
    If they exist I would be more interested in how they give out energy instead of take in energy (mass). But according to Hawkings radiation this generosity is impossible.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  3. #33
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,611
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    294
    Thanked 893x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: black hole predicament

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    If they exist I would be more interested in how they give out energy instead of take in energy (mass). But according to Hawkings radiation this generosity is impossible.

    As energy or matter is squeezed and compacted,funneling down into the jaws of the black
    hole,there would be a strong case for leakage,as cohesion breaks down,there could be a
    spirraling off,one would imagine rotational velocity increasing to such an extent,that
    centrifugal force would eject some energy clear of the black hole.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  4. #34
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: black hole predicament

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    one would imagine rotational velocity increasing to such an extent,that centrifugal force would eject some energy clear of the black hole.
    Now, you are narrating similar to what Stephen Hawking have done. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  5. #35
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,611
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    294
    Thanked 893x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: black hole predicament

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Now, you are narrating similar to what Stephen Hawking have done. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking
    Maybe he has been reading my posts?seriously though,there could easily be a spin off
    whether they be gamma rays,xrays,or sting rays,certainly not Jonny ray!




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  6. #36
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: black hole predicament

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    whether they be gamma rays,xrays,or sting rays,certainly not Jonny ray
    Look like works are being cutout for all the 'rays' for all eternity. To keep busy we need to change our surnames to "Ray' in order to stay in the universal employment line.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  7. #37
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,611
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    294
    Thanked 893x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: black hole predicament

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Look like works are being cutout for all the 'rays' for all eternity. To keep busy we need to change our surnames to "Ray' in order to stay in the universal employment line.
    We will always be employed searching for the perfect plan-prehaps a planning ray?


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Hypothesis of BlackHoles
    By danasurya in forum General Physics
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 11-07-2006, 11:04 PM
  2. The Black Hole
    By jessebonin in forum Cosmology
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-24-2006, 01:25 AM
  3. Dirac's hole vs Einstein's hole
    By AntonioLao in forum General Physics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-31-2005, 06:50 PM
  4. Electron – A Tiny Black Hole
    By vacuum-mechanics in forum Relativity
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 10-17-2005, 06:52 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top