| | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80 | black hole predicament -
02-02-2006, 01:09 PM
Pauli Exclusion Principle does not allow the formation of black holes. Yet news about them keeps popping up in Scientific American, Discover, Astronomy, Sky and Telescope, and many other science news magazines. A large volume of research papers have titles containing the word ‘black hole’. However, observationally, only strong evidence suggested their existence, mainly in binary stars systems and intense x-ray sources. Do they really exist? One will never know unless one gets close to it. As much as the desire to come in contact with it, theorists already set a point of no return as the ‘event horizon’. This control volume is at a Schwarzschild radius off the center. Once the approach is less it is supposedly downhill all the way. Now, this also seems analogous to free fall and Einstein’s principle of equivalence says that the falling body should feel weightless or the same as no force of attraction. Again, this contradicts Newton’s 3rd law if there is no action there cannot be any reaction. So where does the body really go? More embarrassing is the fact that general relativity is based on the idea of mass derived from neutral atoms. However, matter at the singular level of elementary particles possesses not only electric charge but color charge as well. Neutron stars are supposedly made of neutrons and they are steps closer to becoming black holes. Nevertheless, at smaller distances, neutrons are made from quarks having both electric and color charge. Fortunately, there are three elementary particles belonging to the lepton families that are all neutral (no electric nor color charge) and their existence verified by high energy experiments with the exception that theory says they don’t congregate at low temperature. But at extremely high temperature they should but there is no theory to describe it. These are the electron neutrinos, the muon neutrinos, and the tau neutrinos. The problem is that nobody really knows how much they weigh? Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 98 | 
02-18-2007, 08:58 PM
I shall buy a set of scales Antonio and weigh the blighters for you,those dam muon neutrinos and their mates the tau bunch,guess that they would weigh less than that.and
more than this.
Black holes seem portals into another dimension,prehaps the etheric-universe or other
wise called the anti-matter universe.
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Last edited by dleviwing : 03-18-2007 at 12:59 PM.
| |
| | | | | | Master
Status: Offline Posts: 620
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 4x in 4 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2005 Rep Power: 17 | Re: black hole predicament -
03-18-2007, 03:15 AM
Three nearly massless closely related particles. So many of them out there, you would be wasting your life trying to quantitate their total population.
Here's a fun thought, what if one two or all were suddenly endowed with mass. After all, noone really knows when the masses get passed into a particle or absorbed into it, or maybe it jealously steals some other particles mass. And carries it away just as it does for all those little energy amounts that led us to their existence in the first place.
I shouln't tell you this, but I once had a tiny moment where I thought I heard Enrico fermi falling again and trying to express it to anyone who would listen.
Fermi is one of my heroes from yesterday.
Later, | |
| | | | | | 9th degree Black Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 1,579
Thanks Given: 114
Thanked 45x in 43 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006 Rep Power: 26 | Re: black hole predicament -
03-19-2007, 12:29 AM
Nor does anyone truly know how much a photon weighs, or its true size or shape___maybe it's the former of all black holes...? It's black, so far...?
Lloyd Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Pauli Exclusion Principle does not allow the formation of black holes. Yet news about them keeps popping up in Scientific American, Discover, Astronomy, Sky and Telescope, and many other science news magazines. A large volume of research papers have titles containing the word ‘black hole’. However, observationally, only strong evidence suggested their existence, mainly in binary stars systems and intense x-ray sources. Do they really exist? One will never know unless one gets close to it. As much as the desire to come in contact with it, theorists already set a point of no return as the ‘event horizon’. This control volume is at a Schwarzschild radius off the center. Once the approach is less it is supposedly downhill all the way. Now, this also seems analogous to free fall and Einstein’s principle of equivalence says that the falling body should feel weightless or the same as no force of attraction. Again, this contradicts Newton’s 3rd law if there is no action there cannot be any reaction. So where does the body really go? More embarrassing is the fact that general relativity is based on the idea of mass derived from neutral atoms. However, matter at the singular level of elementary particles possesses not only electric charge but color charge as well. Neutron stars are supposedly made of neutrons and they are steps closer to becoming black holes. Nevertheless, at smaller distances, neutrons are made from quarks having both electric and color charge. Fortunately, there are three elementary particles belonging to the lepton families that are all neutral (no electric nor color charge) and their existence verified by high energy experiments with the exception that theory says they don’t congregate at low temperature. But at extremely high temperature they should but there is no theory to describe it. These are the electron neutrinos, the muon neutrinos, and the tau neutrinos. The problem is that nobody really knows how much they weigh? | "To develop the skill of correct thinking is in the first place to learn what you have to disregard. In order to go on, you have to know what to leave out; this is the essence of effective thinking." Kurt Godel "Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live." Albert Einstein "The uncertainty principle is an absolute, finite, universal constant." L.G. "The tick-tick-tick of the cesium atom is a sliding-time-scaler constant of all finite universal motion." L.G. | |
| | | | | | Master
Status: Offline Posts: 620
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 4x in 4 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2005 Rep Power: 17 | Re: black hole predicament -
03-19-2007, 02:32 PM
[quote=michellemfry3142;27885]Three nearly massless closely related particles. So many of them out there, you would be wasting your life trying to quantitate their total population.
Here's a fun thought, what if one two or all were suddenly endowed with mass. After all, noone really knows when the masses get passed into a particle or absorbed into it, or maybe it jealously steals some other particles mass. And carries it away just as it does for all those little energy amounts that led us to their existence in the first place. | |
| | | | | | Master
Status: Offline Posts: 620
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 4x in 4 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2005 Rep Power: 17 | Re: black hole predicament -
03-19-2007, 02:40 PM
I was reading about the rings of the gas giants, and I was wondering, what if the rings were there first, and the planet either passed into an inescapable ring of curvature and gravity that seems to handle anything that might pass through, since it is immeasurable.
Then some special thing happens. A planet emerges. Filling up the black holes direction of indiscriminate consumption. Maybe even converting it's behavior from monster to artistic director of planetary elements, weather, and defense against bombardmant with debris.
Am I doing that science fiction thing again? sorry.... | |
| | | | | | Master
Status: Offline Posts: 620
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 4x in 4 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2005 Rep Power: 17 | Re: black hole predicament -
03-19-2007, 02:42 PM
Oh yeah, that would make these things a white hole, out of a black hole. Hmmm.... | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80 | Re: black hole predicament -
03-20-2007, 12:27 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by michellemfry3142 what if one two or all were suddenly endowed with mass. | If this is true then the problem of the missing mass is solved. See http://www.datasync.com/~rsf1/missmass.htm and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 98 | Re: black hole predicament -
03-20-2007, 01:22 PM
I tend to think of black holes as doorways to the astral/etheric plane,the home of dark matter!
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80 | Re: black hole predicament -
03-21-2007, 02:50 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick I tend to think of black holes as doorways to the astral/etheric plane,the home of dark matter | By their descriptions these doorways are really trapdoors. Once go in no one can come back out. But if we need to harness energy from them then we must find a way to escape these traps: go in, get energy, come back out, done and be happy. Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com | |