regaining the void

[AntonioLao]

Void is supposedly the emptiness that surrounds the universe inside out. However, it gives extension in space and in time. In order for it to sustain different structures of space-time it must be independent of space-time and its influence. Space-time cannot cause the void. On the contrary the void dictates the situation of space-time. What is the true nature of the void? It is nothing else but the square of energy. Not just potential or kinetic but it is derived from scalar inner dot product of infinitesimal orthogonal forces and infinitesimal metric spaces.

The most effective conservation law of physics is the law of energy conservation. It is a time independent law which is the prime mover but it remains motionless. It is obeyed by classical physics, relativity physics, quantum physics but not chaos physics. Why chaos physics doesn’t obey this fundamental law? The not so obvious answer is that chaos theory invokes the quantum genie of negative energy out of the vacuum bottle. Only by regaining the void and squaring the negative energy can the quantum genie be put back into the bottle keeping the eternal balance of the force such that the total linear momentum of the universe is zero.

[mkirkpatrick]

What really is the void?Where is it,well it would seem that we are totally
immerced in it,I would suggest that the real name for the void,would be the aether.The vital fluid that fills the entire universe,and as yet seems to be undetectable,this fluid is the cloth,the soul from which Lifefulness can express
itself in three dimensional space,within the fluid lies phenomenal existance,outside of the fluid lies the un-manifested nomenon.



kind regards michael.

[harmonygirl]

What if the void is soul?

[Guille]

The void is out of the bodies, extension of the beings, whiles the soul is engaged to the them, warped around them.

[harmonygirl]

Riiiiight, but I am thinking about the possibility of the stuff internally being external and vice versa.

[dleviwing]

There was a time in ancient history that the vacuum of space provoked the image of some location or volume devoid of all physical entities. Throughout the past century, science has come to recognize the physical nature of this vacuum and evolved it to be denoted as an entity called spacetime by Relativity Theory. The original notion of an absolutely empty and devoid of all physical entities concept is however, still valid. Within this universe we do not seem to be able to produce a true void condition. Void and space are synonymous for vacuum, so we need to revise our vacuum definition to exclude the word void as a synonym.

[mkirkpatrick]

There was a time in ancient history that the vacuum of space provoked the image of some location or volume devoid of all physical entities. Throughout the past century, science has come to recognize the physical nature of this vacuum and evolved it to be denoted as an entity called spacetime by Relativity Theory. The original notion of an absolutely empty and devoid of all physical entities concept is however, still valid. Within this universe we do not seem to be able to produce a true void condition. Void and space are synonymous for vacuum, so we need to revise our vacuum definition to exclude the word void as a synonym.

I agree with that Dave,we need to revise
the defintion.
kind regards michael,