Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    are in fact dimensional doorways,does this door though,"swing both ways"
    In theory of quantum space-time (TQS), the door swings 8 different ways corresponding to the quantized 8 degrees of freedom (6 for space and 2 for time).
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #12
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,611
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    294
    Thanked 893x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    In theory of quantum space-time (TQS), the door swings 8 different ways corresponding to the quantized 8 degrees of freedom (6 for space and 2 for time).
    Could one really enter an eight entranced door
    methinks that confusion would reign supreme!


    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #13
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    not entrances but directional invariances

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Could one really enter an eight entranced door
    These really are not entrances or doors for exiting and entering but intrinsic directional properties for all existential objects. An object has all 8 properties if and only if it can be viewed from all 8 perspective. An object should have spatially: a left, a right, a back, a front, a top, and a bottom. Temporally, a forward future and a backward past time direction. It is obvious that our future time extension is zero while our past extension is limited by our memory.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #14
    4th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    589
    Blog Entries
    6
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    31
    Say we are colossal. If we have a great magic wand with a polar potential at the tip that repelled the hypothetical pole of a black hole and we tried to touch the black hole with the tip of the wand and it kept moving away but it then tried to restore its original place when we drew the wand away we would have the scenario of what you speak, Antonio. A black hole's freedom of movement is restricted because it knows its place in the cosmic scheme of things. I do not know mine because of uncertainty.
    "There is nothing permanent except change"

  5. #15
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,611
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    294
    Thanked 893x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    These really are not entrances or doors for exiting and entering but intrinsic directional properties for all existential objects. An object has all 8 properties if and only if it can be viewed from all 8 perspective. An object should have spatially: a left, a right, a back, a front, a top, and a bottom. Temporally, a forward future and a backward past time direction. It is obvious that our future time extension is zero while our past extension is limited by our memory.
    This is all theory,is it not Antonio!


    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  6. #16
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    until proven by experiment

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    This is all theory,is it not
    Unfortunately, the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics limits the amount of experimental proofs. However, the existence of intrinsic spin and magnetic moments of all elementary particles whether charged or neutral demonstrated the local infinitesimal symmetry of certain degrees of freedom. The finality lies in the decisiveness of CPT theorem.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. a space-time singularity
    By Casey_deJong in forum Time Travel
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-18-2005, 03:51 AM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-19-2005, 02:37 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top