avoiding singularity

[AntonioLao]

The degree of freedom of a singularity is either zero or infinite when it is embedded in a spherically symmetric continuous, homogeneous, and isotropic generalized vacuum field. For a black hole, this generalized vacuum field becomes particularly the gravitational field generated by the presence of energy-momentum tensors in a bounded region of space-time.

If all these tensors are oriented toward the center of the sphere then the degree of freedom is determined to be zero. Consequently, the formation of a black hole is unavoidable. However, if all of these tensors are pointing away from the center then the degrees of freedom is infinite as in an expanding volume of space-time.

Both of these configurations presupposed time asymmetry, into the past or toward the future. In order to restore time symmetry, the quantum uncertainty in the form of conjugate variables for time and energy must be square integrable such that the square of energy is time independence.

[mkirkpatrick]

The degree of freedom of a singularity is either zero or infinite when it is embedded in a spherically symmetric continuous, homogeneous, and isotropic generalized vacuum field. For a black hole, this generalized vacuum field becomes particularly the gravitational field generated by the presence of energy-momentum tensors in a bounded region of space-time.

If all these tensors are oriented toward the center of the sphere then the degree of freedom is determined to be zero. Consequently, the formation of a black hole is unavoidable. However, if all of these tensors are pointing away from the center then the degrees of freedom is infinite as in an expanding volume of space-time.

Both of these configurations presupposed time asymmetry, into the past or toward the future. In order to restore time symmetry, the quantum uncertainty in the form of conjugate variables for time and energy must be square integrable such that the square of energy is time independence.

What do you think lies at the far side of the singularity,could it
be the Protyle atom,what do you think Antonio.
regards michael.

[Guille]

What if the square of energy is independent of mass and not of time? Is there 0 or infinite dof? Or 1 dof?

[mkirkpatrick]

The degree of freedom of a singularity is either zero or infinite when it is embedded in a spherically symmetric continuous, homogeneous, and isotropic generalized vacuum field. For a black hole, this generalized vacuum field becomes particularly the gravitational field generated by the presence of energy-momentum tensors in a bounded region of space-time.

If all these tensors are oriented toward the center of the sphere then the degree of freedom is determined to be zero. Consequently, the formation of a black hole is unavoidable. However, if all of these tensors are pointing away from the center then the degrees of freedom is infinite as in an expanding volume of space-time.

Both of these configurations presupposed time asymmetry, into the past or toward the future. In order to restore time symmetry, the quantum uncertainty in the form of conjugate variables for time and energy must be square integrable such that the square of energy is time independence.

Could not zero and infinite be one of the same?Zero=none
infinite=none-thing.What is the Real difference!
kind regardsmichael.

[AntonioLao]

could it be the Protyle atom

I call all Protyle atoms as space-time quanta of H+ and H-.

What if the square of energy is independent of mass

But square of energy is more fundamental than mass. Mass is depended on the square root of square of energy multiplied by square of light speed, E=mc².

Could not zero and infinite be one of the same?

No. They are not. One is the mathematical inverse or reciprocal of the other.

[baudrunner]

You're treading on fairly thin ice when performing operations on zero and infinity, my friend.

[AntonioLao]

You're treading on fairly thin ice when performing operations on zero and infinity, my friend.

It's antigravitic ice and there is nothing to fall into icy water except for the silent space of the vacuum.

[mkirkpatrick]

I call all Protyle atoms as space-time quanta of H+ and H-.

But square of energy is more fundamental than mass. Mass is depended on the square root of square of energy multiplied by square of light speed, E=mc².

No. They are not. One is the mathematical inverse or reciprocal of the other.

Thanks for your reply,Antonio,I have learned something new today.


kind regards michael.

[baudrunner]

It's antigravitic ice and there is nothing to fall into icy water except for the silent space of the vacuum.

The unbearable lightness of being quanta no less. Some day you shall join those unbearably light (in this reality) beings and maybe realize if you do not already know it that the great paradox principle where nothing underlies everything and to be the heaviest is to be the most enlightened and that to have infinite mass means to have no time and to have infinite time means to have no mass then to join that depth of consciousness means to exist in all places at the same time therefore you would fall through that ice in the agaraphobic pain of rebirth to return here because of something you forgot to learn which is that to know all is to be nothing and to be nothing is that which we all strive to be because...

It hurts.. to be alive...!

[mkirkpatrick]

There are many sound reasons for knowingly avoiding a singularity,if you were
caught up in one,it would really "stretch" resources to rescue you?
Joking aside,the singularity is motioned by and "held" in place by,a vortex of
unimaginal power!I am inclined to the notion that these "points" of focus,are
infact dimensional doorways,does this door though,"swing both ways" what do
you think!

kind regards michael.