Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > Cosmology
Reload this Page fast moving motionlessness.
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
fast moving motionlessness.
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 94
   
Smile fast moving motionlessness. - 02-20-2006, 08:49 PM

A little theory of mine to put out for possible comment.I would propose that
when absolute motion meets absolute motionlessness,theyboth cancel each
other out,and bring about an equlibrium,a point of balance!Which then leads
me on to imagine thatthis point of balance,could well be a singularity,a point
where strange things seems to happen,like a full stop. there are three points
converging on onepoint!There is perfect equlibrium in the "middle of this dot
absolute motion,somehow "leaning" against the eqilibrium,and absolute motion-
lessness doing the same aswell!They would all be less than an atom apart!!
The weight of a universe spins on a single point?
Any comments folks!

kindest regards michael,


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Blue Belt
TinyTree has a spectacular aura about
 
TinyTree's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 132
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Join Date: Oct 2005
Rep Power: 13
   
02-20-2006, 10:18 PM

I am curious- what do you think "absolute motion" means? Is it something moving at the speed of light?

In a sense things moving at the speed of light are not moving- in their own perspective, time is not travelling. But externally, they are moving absolutely, so the two are meeting, from different time frames.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Universe on the head of a pin theory?
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
6th degree Black Belt
harmonygirl will become famous soon enough
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 844
Thanks Given: 43
Thanked 15x in 15 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 18
   
Cool Universe on the head of a pin theory? - 02-20-2006, 11:57 PM

I'm not sure I understand. Both Absolute motion and absolute motionless require a frame of reference, so how can they be absolute? (up is down and down is up, Alice!) Isn't this balance already universal and we dissect it to come up with our environment and language?


The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
02-21-2006, 04:44 AM

For me the point of balance is a variable. I mean, I agree with this, but I believe this 'perfect equilibrium' is in many different ranges and has different values for each condition (depending on energy, force, matter, mass, velocity, acceleration...). So when absolute motionless meets absolute motion the product is an equlibrium which is not ane xact quantity, it can be any, depending on the circumstances (which are defined by the concepts I wrote in the previous brackets).

Applying this to humans, we can talk of art. Rennaissance artists believed a piece is more artistic if it has more aesthetics. Present artists (abstract expressionists, popartists...) believe a piece is more aesthetic when it has more message. Their all wrong, probably because artists aren't that good at creating theories as philosophers. What is more artistic is a piece that finds the exact appropiate proportions of message and aesthetics, which varies with the circumstances (colours, what's being represented, the theme, the style...).
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 94
   
Smile 02-21-2006, 07:02 AM

I am not 100% sure ofyour meaning here,but it sounds good!

kind regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?

Last edited by dleviwing : 03-18-2007 at 03:31 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
What???
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
6th degree Black Belt
harmonygirl will become famous soon enough
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 844
Thanks Given: 43
Thanked 15x in 15 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 18
   
Cool What??? - 02-21-2006, 11:51 AM

I do not believe in "more artistic". Art is not competition. A piece either speaks the truth to you or it doesn't.


The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
02-22-2006, 04:05 AM

Thanks mkirkpatrik, it is a bit hard to understand but I consider mine a new philosophy of art which is better than those I've read.

Quote:
Originally Posted by harmonygirl
I do not believe in "more artistic". Art is not competition. A piece either speaks the truth to you or it doesn't.
Wait, art is all about falsity. Art is a representation of nature (truth) such that it never tells you the truth. I mean, it's based on truth, but it is not itself truth. I agree completelly that art is not a competition. I didn't mean more artistic in that, I meant that a piece of art gets nearer to perfection in art as it achieves the ideal proportion of aesthetics-message in according to the conditions. I agree the piece of art is to speak, but it is to speak itself (the ideal of art is narcisism), not truth.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
1st degree Black Belt
zeroca has a spectacular aura about
 
zeroca's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 250
Thanks Given: 9
Thanked 8x in 6 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 17
   
02-22-2006, 05:19 AM

Motion takes place freely within absolute motionless!

But their connection, joint, junction, joining, combination – call it as you wish, is the essence of so called transcendental meditation, if the term - meditation is interpreted as any process, which exists within 3D space and time, and the term - transcendental as “existing” beyond bounds (i.e. non-existence, i.e. absolute motionless, i.e. zero). I’ll repeat the part of my recent post:

To illustrate the point let us imagine the universe in the form of the room (gravitation of the earth is ignored), that's full of small balls (the room-the universe, small balls-bodies, having mass). The small balls differ from each other in mass, solidity, proportions and so forth, and all of them make sort of regular movement, and each of them has its trajectory and kinetic energy. Let's imagine, that all of them are united with one another by the thread (each of them to adjacent one and so on. . .), (exactly all bodies are connected with each other by "invisible thread", as they are separate parts of a single whole). Each small ball affects next one, but doesn't affect or affects very little on an infinitely distant small ball. They seem to be thrown about in the room without control (all bodies in three-dimensional space of universe), but in case of fastening of one of them to the ceiling, i.e. to the immovable basis, the movement of every rest small balls (that's to say, without exception, even indefinitely distant ones) will be conditioned by fastened small ball. Their kinetics will change to harmony (i.e. each body will start to move with a minimal loss of energy like a drop of water, that "tries" to take a rounded shape during free fall) and if the fastening of a small ball ("fastening" of the whole universe through the one body) is continuing during the time, every rest small balls will strive to take up its natural place i.e. ultimately will move with the speed and trajectory, that will be the most suitable for their parameters (mass, capacity, consistence and so on. . .). One can compare the above with electrolyte: until the system isn't turned on, all ions move sporadically, but after its turning on each ion "knows where to go" according to its charge, and at a speed, succession and trajectory in accordance with their other parameters. The techniques of it isn’t touched here.
So mentioned above is the only mechanism to influence on universe in order to make it harmonic…

Last edited by dleviwing : 03-18-2007 at 03:30 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 94
   
Smile 02-22-2006, 07:35 AM

What can I say Zeroca,you took the words
right out of my mouth! Thank you,my friend.
kindest regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?

Last edited by dleviwing : 03-18-2007 at 03:30 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Art is not only beauty
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
6th degree Black Belt
harmonygirl will become famous soon enough
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 844
Thanks Given: 43
Thanked 15x in 15 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 18
   
Cool Art is not only beauty - 02-22-2006, 09:38 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by <<>>
Thanks mkirkpatrik, it is a bit hard to understand but I consider mine a new philosophy of art which is better than those I've read.



Wait, art is all about falsity. Art is a representation of nature (truth) such that it never tells you the truth. I mean, it's based on truth, but it is not itself truth. I agree completelly that art is not a competition. I didn't mean more artistic in that, I meant that a piece of art gets nearer to perfection in art as it achieves the ideal proportion of aesthetics-message in according to the conditions. I agree the piece of art is to speak, but it is to speak itself (the ideal of art is narcisism), not truth.
Actually, Guille, my definition of art is quite different. Art reveals a fundamental aspect of truth, which is why, for me, La Giaconde (the Mona Lisa) is not art. I see no truth there. Proportional aesthetics is just technical purity, which for me, certainly does not define art. So according to my definition, a piece speaks truth. How could a piece help but speak itself, I don't understand your point here.


The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Time DHiMac Time Travel 366 07-21-2008 01:18 PM
Finite motion-infinte motionlessness. mkirkpatrick Philosophical Thought 4 10-08-2006 06:49 AM
My Project For A Central Time-coordinates System humanbydefault Spacetime 0 03-13-2006 10:47 AM
Just To Jump In Here Smarag General Discussion 6 02-25-2006 12:32 AM
Rearrangement of physic's foundation Duane Ertle Cosmology 41 02-17-2006 02:27 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com