one-sided universe

[AntonioLao]

The present comprehensible universe is understandably one-sided. The proof is evident by the almost total non-existence of antimatter. This is without exception also true at the local infinitesimal region of quantum vacuum fluctuation and at extremely high energy condition similar to the very early epoch of the expansion of zero volume and infinite temperature.

What is insularly surprising is that the more the universe expands the more one-sided it becomes. Consequently, at a state of maximum expansion or maximum entropy, the average temperature is practically zero and the universe approaches a 2D spacetime sheet twisted into the topology of a one-sided Möbius surface possessing both equally positive and negative principal curvature giving a mean Gaussian curvature of zero. Furthermore, a one-sided universe has only one edge. This edge closed into itself forming a closed curve complete with all eight directional properties.

[mkirkpatrick]

I have just noticed this post of yours Antonio,and it caught my eye,all alone there,being
paid no attention,so as it is Christmas I took pity on this lonely little thread and decided
to post on it.Hope thats okay with you Antonio.

I like the idea of a one-sided universe,sounds unfair?Maybe Antonio we fail to fully understand what antimatter really is!After all has anybody on this planet ever seen any?


What if Antonio that really antimatter was really etheric matter slightly out of phase
with the continuum,coexisting simultanueosly along side physical matter and energy.

There would then be two sides to the universe,one physical,and one etheric!


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

antimatter was really etheric matter slightly out of phase
with the continuum,coexisting simultanueosly along side physical matter and energy.

Thanks for your reply to this long forgotten thread. As the process of birth and rebirth, living things cycled thru life and death. But if something just live without dying could it be called living?

[mkirkpatrick]

Thanks for your reply to this long forgotten thread. As the process of birth and rebirth, living things cycled thru life and death. But if something just live without dying could it be called living?

Possibly not Antonio,have you a suggestion as to what to call this state?


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

a suggestion as to what to call this state?

States of the true quantum vacuum?

[Lloyd Gillespie]

States of the true quantum vacuum?

Antonio, IMO, all of science only studies a .5 universe___where's the other .5...?

Regards,
Lloyd

[mkirkpatrick]

States of the true quantum vacuum?

Are the states of the true quantum vacuum 100% pure,absolute vacuum,or are they
only partial,ie,not 100%!

regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

where's the other .5...?

The antiuniverse? This could not be located.

Are the states of the true quantum vacuum 100% pure,absolute vacuum,or are they only partial,ie,not 100%!

The true quantum vacuum is always at rest. The continuous vacuum moves at superluminal speed, the energy states move at light speed, the matter states and antimatter states move below lightspeed.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

The antiuniverse? This could not be located.

The true quantum vacuum is always at rest. The continuous vacuum moves at superluminal speed, the energy states move at light speed, the matter states and antimatter states move below lightspeed.

Antonio, you seem to be only aware of one half of the completed universal cycle. You will logically become aware of the other half if you simply do the completed mathematics, as Hawking has already done, of the total finite decay, at 10^137years. If the radiation decay math can be done, it's there, in plain logical sight, which is much more sensible than any superluminal science fictions... The laws of conservation of matter require the real radiation changed state matter/motion universe to exist beyond short term finiteness, don't you think?

Regards,
Lloyd

p.s.
Your above superluminal universe, I wrote and web published in `91/`95, tore up, deleted and discarded as non-scientific foolishness, years ago... The reason I did this is that superluminal can far too easily explain all matter/motions, thus it's like using the word god as the same___it's not rigorously, or even simply scientific. It's science fiction, because it can not explain its own fundamentals and principles, without referring to its self-inferred impossible logic of the word or abstract idea. Scientific logic must be founded on principles of real objects and motions, not ontological words...

[mkirkpatrick]

The antiuniverse? This could not be located.

The true quantum vacuum is always at rest. The continuous vacuum moves at superluminal speed, the energy states move at light speed, the matter states and antimatter states move below lightspeed.

Would then another name for the true quantum vacuum be the ether field?
They seem the same to me Antonio,as our great BARD once said,"A rose by
any other name would smell as sweet"!

regards michael.