[humanbydefault]

Originally Posted by theunify

I add more credance to this argument of yours. I'd like to see you define Casmir effect since you reference it many times without initial explanation..beyond that your theory that anti-matter is artificial may be correct; can you imagine two jets going at light speed... when they crash you will have two jets and the "sonic booms" will collide and create an effect analogous to antimatter.. It will seem that these "sonic booms" the jets all go up in smoke as if they were anti-particles. When really it's just a big fireballs with two sources of heat. One invisible and one visible.

J'adore le analogie. Il est por favor le science nat!

************************************************** *************************

You asked for it and your wish is acceptable:

Casimir effect

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Jump to: navigation, search
"In physics, the Casimir effect is a physical force exerted between separate objects, which is due to neither charge, gravity, nor the exchange of particles, but instead is due to resonance of all-pervasive energy fields in the intervening space between the objects. This is sometimes described in terms of virtual particles interacting with the objects, due to the mathematical form of one possible way of calculating the strength of the effect. Since the strength of the force falls off rapidly with distance it is only measurable when the distance between the objects is extremely small. On a submicron scale, this force becomes so strong that it becomes the dominant force between uncharged conductors." [end of quote].

Isn't it interesting? I was thinking to post this piece of "conclusions" long before I begun writing about it but I might have forget about it... Sorry!

No charge? No gravity? No exchange of particles? I think that was an understatement!

Resonance of what? I guess they were referring to waves of "something"... right? Something that MUST BE REAL ENOUGH to produce a "FORCE."

The EFECTIVE or CRITICAL DISTANCE IS.... "submicron scale..."!!! OUCH! It almost seems that they are getting to close to some "familiar atomic lengths" are they not?

Think about it my friends! Those "mysterious waves" (echoes from the eather harmonics, not virtual ones as they baptized them) capables of producing such powerful attracting forces at such and such distances were NOTHING compared to the same effect produced by spherical waves [also in perfect resonance] during mutual interactions!!!

"MY WAVES" emanating from those speks of energy [true creators of mass and matter during the spinning process depicted in my preceeding thread titled "Einstein's myth: space and time"] are billions of times stronger than those "ridiculously weak" forces Dr. Casimir discovered in his great experiments (!)

"The Casimir effect" is just an equivalent physical effect ... PURE SCIENCE!... and one that I chose as evidence to prove you that I've been right in everything I've written in this forum about the true origin of matter: energy-mass inside a standing wave pattern.

If you take your time and followed from the very beginnings of my postings, you'll find a sense of "continuity" in the meanings of my words.

That's why I had to write my book.

I suppose that you probably realised that there was something missing in my statements about the real purpose of me self-publishing a book [probably] no one will buy or take seriously... My book was not written in vain... I can assure you that!

Those images, ideas and "unproven concepts" included in its chapters are a compilation of my beliefs and the only way I can accept the physical reality of our existence.

The "casimir effect" was judged by "ET" [an alien that paid me with an unexpected visit...] as the results of standing waves produced inside "the resonance box." The book written by John Gribbin, quoted in my book, argumenting the observed "force" as the result of those waves outside the box exerting preassure over the plaques... instead of those waves acting in spin fashion inside it] was as real as the rest of the books used for quotes there. You could find that book and read it if necessary to compare both opposing points of views.

My book contains 5000 words from real books and words from the mouth of our best physicists and theoricists in the field of physics including Einstein, Bohr, and others. Most of them were subject to some "alien criticism" along with a dosage of good humor and sarcastic irony.

When I wrote my book I had no idea about the phenomenon called "neutrino oscillation" for example. It would have been a great evidence to my theories but I sincerely didn't know about that research... however all I imagined back in 2004 when I decided to write this little book about the "changing nature of matter" was actually based in the mutual interactions of energy-waves!

No! I am not for the money on this... I would have been capable of writting something more "attracting" to simpler minds for sure! I chose to write for readers that are not still with us in this time and place... I wrote my book for those yet to come. Why? Well... I wanted them to know that I never shared the convenient "marriage" between physics and metaphysics even under striking names as quantum mechanics or general relativity... I wanted [them] to "see" that I had a different "mental picture" of what the physical reality in fact was.

HUMANBYDEFAULT

www.humanbydefault.com

[humanbydefault]

Let's test your abilities... shall we?

Let's start with this:

From wikipedia:

"In physics, asymptotic freedom is the property of some gauge theories in which the interaction between the particles, such as quarks, becomes arbitrarily weak at ever shorter distances, i.e. length scales that asymptotically converge to zero (or, equivalently, energy scales that become arbitrarily large)..."

Now! Lets' take another piece:

The discovery also helped rehabilitate the reputation of quantum field theory (QFT) as a coherent description of particle interactions. Prior to 1973, many theorists suspected that QFT was rendered fundamentally incoherent by the short-distance Landau pole that arose in quantum electrodynamics and some other field theories. Asymptotically free theories, however, lack this Landau pole. The discovery of asymptotic freedom was therefore a key development toward the emergence of a Standard Model of particle physics based on quantum field theory.

(While the Standard Model is not itself entirely asymptotically free, the phenomenon raises the possibility that it could be an effective field theory approximation to an asymptotically free grand unified theory; and since its strong interactions are asymptotically free, any Landau poles in it are banished anyway to a realm far beneath the Planck length.)

Isn't it amazing!!!

Now... What is the "landau pole" after all...

In physics, Landau pole is the energy scale (or the precise value of the energy) where a coupling constant (the strength of an interaction) of a quantum field theory becomes infinite. Such a possibility was pointed out by the eminent physicist Lev Davidovich Landau. The dependence of coupling constants on the energy scale is one of the basic ideas behind the renormalization group.

OHHH! YES! The famous "renormalization solution..." The convenient and appropiate "salvation" for the materialistic particle theory of the human race...!!!!

But allow me to paste what followes later on:

... "The coupling constant grows with energy, and at some energy scale the growth becomes infinite and the coupling constant itself diverges..."

You may want to read more than once those quotation before jumping to rush ANY conclusions, but you may know what I'm up to:

The "critical distance" [I've mentioned to you while I was depicting the "standing nuclear wave" pattern of interference between speks of energy] becomes critical at a "FIXED" distance between the spherical waves during their interactions... right? At that point the "FORCE" will increase to its highest magnitude keeping the speks close-but-not-fused-to-each-other (!)

HOWEVER...

We are talking about a SPINNING PATTERN aren't we...? Spinning pattern can't be entirely stables in 3dimensional space... or I'm delusional here?

Try to rotate two magnets enough close to each other that always the negative "pole" will be facing the positive of the other magnet...

Will they show a CONSTANT and STABLE pattern of attraction with respect to one another?

THINK!!!!

Now you see my point!!!! That's why "landau poles" can't be stables and the energy inside those "couplings" must... how they described them... OH YES!

..."DIVERGE"... In other words... vary as in a perpetual vibration pattern. (!)

That incomprehensible "freedom" showed by those "particles" inside their "couplings" while reaching those critical distance, their inability to reach "INFINITE VALUES" [rendering all our theories wrong], giving us the only choice avalibale for our maths to prove it in something called "renormalization techniques" [tricks in English]... Could [only] be explained by accepting "the physical reality" the way I've been writing about all this time.

Energy at those critical distances are "theroretically banned from assuming getting infinite values" due to the cyclical nature of the "STANDING WAVE."

When the interacting wavelength of the "spherical wave interference" fits exactly in the "resonance box" formed with the proximity of both speks of energy the coupling reaches the highest value but the same nature of the pattern renders the attracting force BACK INTO FINITE VALUES due to the rotation of the pattern that brought them "to existence." (!!!!)

Am I talking in riddles here? Could you agree on this with me or I am really becoming an ALIEN sort of speaking...?

The idea does terrifies me non-the-less... I'm afraid I am able to see things people with a high superior degree and knowledge of the way physics works... simply can't!

Perhaps I'm the one death-wrong in all this!

I need you to clarify if I'm getting close to madness or you can see what I can too.

HUMANBYDEFAULT

[humanbydefault]

[the madness continues...]

We [meaning human physicists] named it "electro-magnetic" phenomenon. I thinks it's pretty simple to understand that the concept starts with "electro-" which means a physical event that is SCALE-DEPENDENT. It is a "force" as magnetic in its origin that relys on the SPIN present in "electron-orbits." I think that was not "alien" to anyone here... I hope!

Would you be willing to conceive beyond that "discriminative and ilogically restrictited" LIMIT?

How about... "PROTO-MAGNETIC POLARITY"? And therefore "PROTO-MAGNETIC POLES"?

Or even deeper than that...

Could you admit in your "wildest imagination" the possibility [at least] of the existence of a "QUARKO-MAGNETIC FORCE or POLARITY"...?

Well... those concepts are not invented yet since they belong to the T.O.E. itself... But you don't believe me right?

Let me put it this way:

What do you think Casimir would find if he had the ability to [really] observe the detailed structural nature of the "force" he discovered in his famous experiment?

I think he would see an interesting analogy between those "Landau poles" and the values of that force he thought was caused by "virtual photons."

Just as the 'thought-experiment" I proposed to you above with two pieces of magnets made to rotate one in a close distance to the other always keeping the opposite poles in phase (!)

Let's say that the nature of "electro-magnetism" is somehow more "COMPATIBLE" with the nature of "our local eather."

"Proton-magnetism" or even "Quarko-magnetism" ON THE OTHER HAND are not compatibles with our REALITY and therefore they exist in deeper levels of energy but capables of producing such stronger "COUPLINGS" that we may have confused them with "particles" glued each other with some others named "messengers"...

INTERESTING!

HUMANBYDEFAULT

www.humanbydefault.com

[theunify]

Instead of going mad you should realize your words are not theories, they are not published, nor do you sign your real name on them, can you check out my website www.theunificationtheory.com, I have answered in plain english many of the problems you are inventing in your mind.

If you think you are "alien" in my book I propose that the Earth does not cause gravity, that it comes from outerspace, please read my book, I am the one who has the right to be called "mad" for I am the one who stands by a book.

[humanbydefault]

Come on john!

I congratulate you in your theories and merits... however all I read in the page site you gave me sounds to me as pure "philosophical bla-bla-bla... no offense!
As a matter of clarification I'll answer your words:

"Instead of going mad you should realize your words are not theories, they are not published, nor do you sign your real name on them..." [end of quote]

They may not seems [TO YOU MY DEAR FORUM-MATE] as a theory... I can't blame you for that. On the other hand they WERE (self) PUBLISHED in my book [more than two years ago] and my name is on the front cover of my book... How could you missed it?
I think that you should "come down" a little... then you'll be able to be heard by others.

At least I don't hide myself behind assumed "all-answering" mathematical "equations" giving us the answer about something not even Einstein and the best minds in cosmology could answer as for today.

I wrote [and self-published two years ago] a book that its only intend was to put in prints my disatisfaction towards the orthodox points of views concerning matter, "sub-atomic particles" as independent entities with a convenient "duality" [the so-called "complementary principle" and part of the "Copenhagen Interpretation"] and gravity [as Einstein stated in his Relativity Theory] as the result of the effect MASS produces in the fabric of "space-time."

I'm not claming discoveries, much less, I'm not trying to pass for the genius who knows everything from the "Big-bang" to the "infinite of the infinites"... Don't take it up on me, please!

I write for fun.

I'm willing to discuss [not argue in the wrong fashion way] about my points of views and yours [whoever you are: a cleaning manager in the movie theater or a Nobel-prize laurate... doesn't matter to me] It's never about who thought about one thing first or second! I couldn't "copy" any of your arguments since all I said [in this forum] has been timely-recorded when not even you were around. My best evidence [as I have said before] is my book. I write with the sole intention to comunicate my images and thoughts [and why not? my personal beliefs too] about the greatest secrets of the universe.

From what I read in your page, you talk about "gravitons" in relation with gravity and planets. I spoke about eather [not space-time curved by the planet's mass] ...but one originated inside the sun [the star]. Planets [just as I literally depiected in my book two years ago now published...] are nothing more than "puppets" in a sort of game played by a process originated inside the sun's corona.

Do not misunderstand me please! I respect every member of this forum and I have no intentions to gain enemies... never have! I am open to suggestions, healthy discussions and disagreements, but for me all sort of childish behavior over "who wrote about it first: "the chicken or the egg?" is out of "synch" and to be honest with you... I aint got no time either.

Thanks for your comment

HUMANBYDEFAULT

This is [once again] the site of my (already) self-published libel:
www.humanbydefault.com

[theunify]

Thank you for your courageous reply, I was just saying in my post that I am unwilling to help you if and only if you do not read other people's accounts of your ideas.

It is mad to only consider your own ideas as unique.

I hope you liked some parts of my book/site, I would not focuse too much on the math "genesis equation/equation of the photon" the book is very much supposed to explain in plain english details which when proven people will say
"oh! so it's that simple is it"

Ask yourself this if your ideas didn't interest me why would I bother? The fact is I'm deeply interested in who discovered what and when, as I see some importance to being able to refine ideas with people who have indepently come to the same conclusions.

As for your website, it went online TODAY! so how can you expect me to have read it? Excerpts from you book only prove you are unwilling to share your theory for reasons undefined.

Any TOE is not going to be a Hawking bestseller, it will have to be an "embarrassing account" of the author's struggle to put forward a simpler, more correct understandable version of our Solar System.

NOW, you refer to your Graviton theory, how do you suggest I find the best version of this? YOu cannot expect me to search thru the forums and look at the past, this is not productive.
Maybe you can post it here for me,

I doubt it is the same as my "Unified Gravity" because I do not say that gravitons come from the suns carona, I say that they come from galaxies in general, gravitons are repulsive, not attractive, please read the chapter...or the whole book before commenting that my theory is incorrect, in the name of Science.

I have not said your theory is incorrect. I said don't go mad in these FORUMS, that is all I said. Stop repeating yourself over and over acting like you are the only one working hard..instead branch out and become more well rounded with other peoples thoughts so that you can find common ground.

What common ground would you like to discuss?

[theunify]

WEll I checked your book, not much there DUDE!, nothing I couldn't have written after watching an episode of Stephen Hawking Television. I simply don't think scientists are interested in reading something that doesn't use math, by not using math, you make your theory unprovable, and hence it can never be proven. Even if everything you say is correct, it is still the conclusion of the reader that you arrived at that position by pure chance, but pure creative writing alone.

Sorry to break the news but I was not on drugs when I wrote my book.

And again, I challenge you.

[humanbydefault]

I see you are looking for confrontations "of the other type." Let the others be the judge of your own words.
First allow me to point out a coupple of things about your scientific background if that's the correct word to use here:

You're writting or wrote [already] a book [a serious scientific book] about Gravity and you had no clue about the "Casimir Effect"? You wrote it yourself right here...can't go back now! The Casimir effect was one of the greatest experiments conducted to interpret the nature of the vacuum [eather].

Why not mathematics in my book? Simple! I wrote a book for everyone over the age of 16. A teenager interested in getting a different picture of what's being said to him in class will look at my book with an alternative to books just like yours using the same concepts orthodox teachers use in a daily basis.

You're right on that! When you read my book you have the feeling of being watching a documentary film about the best kept secrets of the universe... meanning the structure of matter, a different model of the atom, the existence of the eather [including its origin inside the stars...etc].

I considered my book as a fiction book, not a pseudo-scientific one like yours...DUDE!

I'm sorry to disappoint you about your site, I was there only 5 minutes and what I read was more than enough to bore me to death... Sorry for being sincere now.

I understand one thing: It's not a requisite of this forum that its members have to like each other nor that they have to reach some common ground about their "own theories"... am I right? Of course I am!

I don't know you theunify but I had enough of your arrogance and unmaturity by now.
You see [dude] I'm 53 and I have the gut-feeling that I could be your father [judging by your age and mine and nothing else] Why don't you make yourself a favor and show your "teen-superiorities" to some else more... contemporary to your own.

You're [in case you haven't realized yet] interfering in "my thread" with childish claims of alleged "patent for theories" that happen to have some resemblings to mine...If I've been correct in your "charges" (?)

I'm not interested in your book nor I am in your theories... for that I appologize!

Why don't you open a new thread about the unique importance of your roll in theoretical physics and the universal implications of the veracity of your own theories and leave me alone so I could continue with my hypothetical analysis of some of the aspect of the physical reality.

I'm convinced that "the others" are not particulary interested in this kind of superficial discussion we are having now...

Please! Do no force me to file a complaint to the administrator about this... You're interfering with my thread... since your comments are not relevant to "landau poles" or the Casimir effect or any of the subjects treated before.

HUMANBYDEFAULT

[God luck with your book and your theories]

[theunify]

I apologize for the method of my posting, I guess you could say I spoke before I thought about what I was saying, I didn't even see the Casimir effect definition you posted, I'm sorry about that; I'll retract my critisism because author's like you and author's like me actually support each other much like a house of cards. I'm 21 right now, my scientific background is meaningless and I rest my theory on my math which is a universal language.

I still think your an American Snob who thinks everyone will understand your english, I have a hard time following it, how do you think a 16 year old who doesn't speak english will reckognize your work in the future?

[humanbydefault]

Have you ever had to listen to German theoretical geniuses as Bohr or Eisntein before? They spoke even weird to me too because they were not borne in America, my dear 21 year old friend. I was borne in Cuba, Lived in Hungary [Budapest] for almost 5 years where I learned the language enough to become a translator [I still keep my certificate given by the Hungarian academy, but that's not important...] I also lived in Montreal Canada for almost 2 years and I happen to get the first steps in French-quebeqoiuse too.

As you see I am many-cultures in one... There is a Hungarian saying" "You are as mamny persons [individuals] as languages you speak" I agree with it.

However I had my book edited by an american professor of literature before I sent it for fianl print.

I believe I answered some of your question now. I admire your enthusiasm toward physics and I aplaude that... But the best lesson you could get is to be humble sometimes, especially when you try to reach to others.

No harm done.

HBD