About Vacuum and superconductivity.

[socratus]

================
When you get down to -273 degree
you get superconductivity.
A superconductivity is possible to reach only
if there are space of helium II, helium I .
It means, what thinking about vacuum,
about approximately zero degree,
we must put in the foundation not protons,
not hydrogen, but the helium II, helium I,
the particles of helium II,
the particles of helium I.
Maybe the “ Theory of quant gravitation” is closely
tied with the “ Theory of superconductivity”…. ?
Maybe the “ Theory of star formation” is closely
tied with the “ Theory of superconductivity”…. ?
===============

[mkirkpatrick]

thanks Socratus,superconductivity can also occur I believe,within a individual in a state
of Samadhi,where a gravity well can open,and download a wave of super-consciousness
to the individual,all at room temperature though,there are other similarities as well ,but
this one will suffice for now.


regards michael.

[socratus]

Question:
What is connection between vacuum and superconductivity?
============
The answers.
1.
A vacuum has nothing to do with superconductivity.
If you have a vacuum then you'll have nothing to conduct!
2.
If you allow a gas to expand it will cool.
One method of producing extremely cold temperatures
is to create a near perfect vacuum and let a gas expand
into it causing a temperature drop. It is the low temperature
achieved with vacuum technology and
not the vacuum that permits superconductivity.
3.
No connection between vacuum and superconductivity.
There is a connection with temperature though.
Many materials become super conductors at very low temperatures.
4.
The only connection with the two ,
the vacuum was used to insulate the super cooled amplifier
which used superconductivity.
=============
As usual , nobody agree with me........

[socratus]

Gravitomagnetic Fields in Rotating Superconductors
to Solve Tate's Cooper Pair Mass Anomaly
Authors: M. Tajmar, C.J. de Matos
(Submitted on 20 Jul 2006)
Abstract: Superconductors have often been used to claim gravitational anomalies in the context of breakthrough propulsion. The experiments could not be reproduced by others up to now, and the theories were either shown to be wrong or are often based on difficult to prove assumptions. We will show that superconductors indeed could be used to produce non-classical gravitational fields, based on the established disagreement between theoretical prediction and measured Cooper-pair mass in Niobium. Tate et al failed to measure the Cooper-pair mass in Niobium as predicted by quantum theory. This has been discussed in the literature without any apparent solution. Based on the work from DeWitt to include gravitomagnetism in the canonical momentum of Cooper-pairs, the authors published a number of papers discussing a possibly involved gravitomagnetic field in rotating superconductors to solve Tate's measured anomaly. Although one possibility to match Tate's measurement, a number of reasons were developed by the authors over the last years to show that the gravitomagnetic field in a rotating quantum material must be different from its classical value and that Tate's result is actually the first experimental sign for it. This paper reviews the latest theoretical approaches to solve the Tate Cooper-pair anomaly based on gravitomagnetic fields in rotating superconductors.
=================
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0607086

[socratus]

Pleas, remember the helium II and helium I
are different from all another elements of nature.
===================

[mkirkpatrick]

Pleas, remember the helium II and helium I
are different from all another elements of nature.
===================

That being the case,they why do you think that is?



regards michael.

[dleviwing]

Question:
What is connection between vacuum and superconductivity?
============
The answers.
1. A vacuum has nothing to do with superconductivity. If you have a vacuum then you'll have nothing to conduct!
2. If you allow a gas to expand it will cool. One method of producing extremely cold temperatures is to create a near perfect vacuum and let a gas expand into it causing a temperature drop. It is the low temperature achieved with vacuum technology and
not the vacuum that permits superconductivity.
3. No connection between vacuum and superconductivity. There is a connection with temperature though. Many materials become super conductors at very low temperatures.
4. The only connection with the two , the vacuum was used to insulate the super cooled amplifier which used superconductivity.
=============
As usual , nobody agree with me........

Is it possible that the fact that nobody agrees with you is because you’re WRONG?

[baudrunner]

The science of superconductivity deals with superconducting materials, and temperature factors into it because at temperatures approaching absolute zero atomic activity slows down significantly, allowing tunnelling effects to motivate electron currents to travel almost without friction. This is extremely important. For a constant current of 120 amps (the size of the main alternator fuse in your car), a wire CM of 105535 (0-ga wire), the voltage drop on a 12' wire would be about 0.144 volts (found here). That really adds up over long distances, and that is why we have an electrical grid that distributes power over international boundaries, because we simply can't conduct electricity over very long wires economically. Superconducting materials in testing over distances without coolling are approaching the desired behaviour. Vacuum has nothing to do with it, so why even bring it up?

[socratus]

Dear dleviwing.
I am not wrong. I am right.
I think, the reason that nobody agrees with me is
that nobody know what Vacuum is.

[socratus]

Dear baudrunner,
You think as an good engineer.
But science is different from engineering.
=============