[WillieB]

It is readily admitted that this posting is pure conjecture. But it is a logical conjecture.

In order to comprehend what follows it will be necessary for you to become familiar with the concepts put forward at the web site entitled www.theincrementaluniverse.com (henceforth the IU). The paper is long and it is excruciatingly boring at times. As it is difficult (at least for me) to fully absorb long and complicated material from a computer screen I suggest that you print it out and study it at your leisure. For those who would object to the use of so much paper (28 pages or so) please send an email to me at www.bwbilljock@bellsouth.net and I would be pleased to snail mail a hard copy to truly interested parties. To fully understand the following it is most critical that you are able to conceptualize the increments and to appreciate their method of propulsion and their bonding characteristics.

I reject outright the actual existence of a singularity. To me the compression of a huge amount of mass into an infinitely small point is nothing short of ludicrous. How we allow ourselves to be seduced by the beauty of elegant mathematics is amazing. As most of the mathematics of black holes does presume their mass to be contained within an infinitely small point, a singularity, a question is cast upon its precision. However, orbital mechanics has proven that a huge amount of mass can be contained within an amazingly small volume of space. What is this mass? Mathematics has shown that neutron stars possess a density comparable to that of the nucleus of an atom. Is there an even denser state of matter? If there is we have not yet identified it. If it exists what is it composition?

The IU claims that the empty space surrounding us and which contains this universe (and whatever else) is saturated with our increments. And, of course, there are a few bundles of electric charge floating around which, for whatever reason, are temporarily not involved in the orbits forming the increment. The increments have the capability of forming relationships with one another; bonds to form particulate matter and waves to form electromagnetic energy and which can express itself as matter.

When a massive star collapses on itself a portion of its mass forms a neutron star. The classes of matter thought to form a neutron star are electrons, protons and neutrons. As its mass grows due to accretion its diameter shrinks. The matter close to its core collapses into some unknown state which has a fictionalized name of “neutronium.” Its composition is a mystery. I like to think of it as being a “soup” of increments coexisting with one another and which are perfectly polarized
along radials extending isotropically from its center. As the mass of the agglomeration continues to grow it becomes more and more difficult for the free increments to pass through it. The velocity of those that do make it through continues to decrease and the force of gravity increases – up to a point. At some point the lack of increments traveling directly away from the PBH begins to be felt by the incoming increments. As they (the outgoing increments) are not there to exert their accelerations toward the PBH the incoming increments become diverted away from their paths so that they actually travel around the PBH as diagrammatically shown in the picture below.

Paths of incoming increments are diverted by the lack of meeting increments on line to PBH

The Perfect Black Hole

Reduced number of increments passing through the PBH



(I am not very adept at computers and the illustration that I prepared using Office Word is not showing up here while the text contained within the illustration is showing. Just picture a black circle with a bunch of arrows traveling horizontally in both directions but they are curving around the black hole to return to their original vector on the opposite side. Sorry about that!)


The picture is extremely diagrammatic. It only shows the increments traveling on two lines. These conditions would exist isotropically on every line passing through the PBH.

As the number of increments passing through the PBH decreases the strength of the gravitational field decreases and the density of its material decreases while its volume increases. At the point at which the gravitational field is just strong enough to prevent the dissolution or breakup of the PBH a state of equilibrium is created and the black hole remains perfectly static, no longer accreting additional matter. If the PBH is truly perfect the longest traveling traversing increments make it through just to the opposite surface where they become trapped. In this case its gravitational field is actually nonexistent and its detection through measuring its effect on adjacent stars would be impossible while the PBH continues to grow in volume. Using the word massive to describe it is no longer applicable. As stated earlier the only remaining indication of its presence is its capability of creating the lensing effect.

So, what do you think? Do perfect black holes really exist? If so, how many are out there? Even more interesting, what would happen if two of them were to collide? Could it be that it would create another big bang?

Weigh in on this. It’s fun!!!

[mkirkpatrick]

Thanks Willie b,the thread title could be seen to suggest that there are imperfect black
holes as well!

How many are there? Guess the number would be "telephone numbers",I see black holes
as natural universal balancers of energy transference from the physical universe to the
opposite universe,call it anti-matter,or the etheric universe,it matters not.


Prehaps rather than the singularity,that you see as ludicrous Willie,what about a "rupture"
a point where the pressure it so intense,it causes a rupture in the relative continuum
and permits entry into the opposite universe?

There is the other question as well,whether they rotate or not!


regards michael.

[mkirkpatrick]

Are there sub-atomic black holes? We could be host to them and know it not! Is memory
loss due to a sub-atomic black hole?





regards michael.