[AntonioLao]

John,

vacuum polarization can also be explained as the existence of this parallel universe. So we don't have to say that we are getting energy out of nothing. The vacuum field is just a gateway between this two worlds. When we get virtual particles, they were there all along just behind the vacuum gate.

Another thing, antimatter in the form of an anti-atom still cannot be created. Because the anti-hydrogen would have one positron orbiting an anti-proton. This anti-hydrogen does not exist naturally and also cannot be created artificially as we did for some radioactive elements. the anti-particles of high energy physics also do not exist naturally but some can be created in the laboratory of high energy accelerators. The evidence is compelling for the existence of a parallel world just infinitesimally distant of the vacuum field.

antonio

[AntonioLao]

The last semblance of atom-like antimatter was the discovery of positronium by Martin Deutsch in 1951. Deutsch died in August 16, 2002 at the age of 85 without ever receiving the Nobel Prize. But this discovery was instrumental for the advancement of QED for which in 1965 Richard Feynman was awarded the Nobel Prize together with Julian Schwinger and Shinichiro Tomonaga.

In 1932, the same year that Werner Heisenberg was awarded the Nobel Prize for publishing his 1927 paper on the Uncertainty Principle, Carl Anderson theorized the existence of positronium, right after his discovery of positron in the tracks of cosmic rays. Anderson received Nobel Prize in 1936 and his discovery also vindicated the Dirac equation. Together with Erwin Schrodinger's works on non-relativistic quantum mechanics, both were awarded Nobel Prize in 1933, Dirac for his works on relativistic quantum mechanics, precursor of all quantum field theories.

Deutsch did find two states of positronium, parapositronium and orthopositronium, respectively each decays by annihilation into 2 photons within tenth of a nanosecond and into 3 photons within 1 nanosecond. It is obvious that the scientific community did not think his discovery was that important otherwise, at the most, he would have received the Nobel Prize before 1960, if ever intended.

[Guille]

What is a positromnium? what is it's anti-particle? where is it manifestated/in?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE

What is a positromnium?

the atom-like structure containing 1 electron and 1 positron or anti-electron. It is very unstable, it dies within a few nanoseconds.

[Explorer]

In my Toe the right-handed neutrinos may very well be here but as another particle/particles going backwards in time. The problem is that we would have to conduct an experiment showing what the neutrino might become when twisting it in time... huge problem. Does the neutrino ever fall apart or something like that? Or is it stable?

AntonioLao... what do you think is the difference between my theory of possible "two-directional"-time in this universe and your view that a paralell universe might explain these missing neutrinos? Could they possibly both be true? As I see it without any calculations as such they are quite close to each other.

[Guille]

I think both your theories could be true paralelly, but not mixed. If each of your dimensions of time is the dimension of time at each unvierse, then you coudl start talking about bi-trueness.

[AntonioLao]

what do you think is the difference between my theory of possible "two-directional"-time in this universe and your view that a paralell universe might explain these missing neutrinos? Could they possibly both be true?

IMHO, all quantum properties of nature have this 2-time direction problem and helicity and parity problem. But a continuum theory such as Einstein's general relativity does not have these problems. General relativity explains the universe at large but quantum field theories explain the universe in the small. A TOE must explains the universe big and small, in other words, the TOE must describes zero energy (mass) and also infinite energy (mass) within the same formalism.

[mkirkpatrick]

What sort of spin would these here neutrinos have,persumably a left-handed spin,and we cannot find a right handed one!is that right!what is the spin of votices in this universe,is it left handed,or do we think not.Enstein talked of
parallel worlds separated by a dimensional doorway,which could be linked to a vortex within a rotating black-hole which in turn could could link up two universes one of matter and one of anti-matter,the conduit being the spiral
which at its lowest end would be the singularity,which would permit the transfer.
Hey maybe those pesky neotrinos are hold-up there?


kind regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick

What sort of spin would these here neutrinos have

The technical name is called helicity. I'm still trying to understand it myself. I'm doing some research on magnetic helicity see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_helicity

[mkirkpatrick]

Antonio,You said that you were trying to understand the magnetic-helicity
theory,I have had a brief look at the outlines of it,it talks about the extent to which a magnetic field "wraps around itself"and the idea of a twisted rope,this configuration would have nonzero magnatic helicity,and goes on to say about left-handed ropes,and right handed ropes,each having a negitive and a positive value.This mention of twisted ropes,reminds me of the vortex,one spinning clockwise,the other anticlockwise,my question Antonio,is what is it that decides
the rotational direction!And also is this type of wrapping-around,one that spins
with a wider entrance at the entrance of the vortice narrowing down to a point at the exit end!And where does this exit lead too?


kind regards michael.