Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26
  1. #21
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    what is it that decides the rotational direction!And also is this type of wrapping-around,one that spins with a wider entrance at the entrance of the vortice narrowing down to a point at the exit end!And where does this exit lead too?
    The directions might be based on randomization, which is the same as chaos and unpredictability and nonlinearity. The exit ends feed into other orthogonal vortices in a different dimensional plane. What really bothers me is that no one or as far as I know that the speed of the magnetic wrapping was never been clocked. In other words, nobody knows how fast it is rotating, at the speed of light?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #22
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,611
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    294
    Thanked 893x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Dimensional plane to Where???

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    The directions might be based on randomization, which is the same as chaos and unpredictability and nonlinearity. The exit ends feed into other orthogonal vortices in a different dimensional plane. What really bothers me is that no one or as far as I know that the speed of the magnetic wrapping was never been clocked. In other words, nobody knows how fast it is rotating, at the speed of light?
    Many thanks Antonio,for your comments,am most
    grateful to you,tell me what do you think of lies at the end of orthogonal vortices,if it is another dimensional-plane,is that plane within this universe!



    many thanks michael.

  3. #23
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    is that plane within this universe!
    It could be another universe different from ours. See wormholes and white holes images at http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/schww.html
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #24
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    The generalization to the title of post 1 is where are all the antiparticles with the exception of neutral atomic configurations of positive nucleus and negative orbitals.Neutral atomic configurations of negative nucleus and positive orbitals as that suitable for all antimatter cannot be found anywhere in the whole universe.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  5. #25
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,611
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    294
    Thanked 893x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Is that because they are not in this universe?

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    The generalization to the title of post 1 is where are all the antiparticles with the exception of neutral atomic configurations of positive nucleus and negative orbitals.Neutral atomic configurations of negative nucleus and positive orbitals as that suitable for all antimatter cannot be found anywhere in the whole universe.
    Is the reason they cannot be found
    because they are not of this universe,or that they have no real-value or existance outside of those who first thought them up!Or are we looking in the wrong place.


    kind regards michael

  6. #26
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    live from CERN

    This website sponsored by CERN, the high energy center of Europe discusses all the different aspects of antimatter

    http://livefromcern.web.cern.ch/live...rn/antimatter/
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Fundamental Particles
    By Guille in forum Quantum Physics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-08-2008, 12:14 PM
  2. wanted: willing neutrinos for cold fusion
    By AntonioLao in forum General Physics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-24-2006, 12:37 PM
  3. mass independence
    By AntonioLao in forum Quantum Physics
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 02-06-2006, 02:15 PM
  4. Neutrinos have mass, that means ...
    By Mike 5 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-02-2005, 06:06 AM
  5. Neutrinos
    By mms in forum General Physics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-14-2005, 04:57 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top