Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > Cosmology
Reload this Page where are all the right-handed neutrinos?
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old
  (#21 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
10-25-2005, 11:36 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
what is it that decides the rotational direction!And also is this type of wrapping-around,one that spins with a wider entrance at the entrance of the vortice narrowing down to a point at the exit end!And where does this exit lead too?
The directions might be based on randomization, which is the same as chaos and unpredictability and nonlinearity. The exit ends feed into other orthogonal vortices in a different dimensional plane. What really bothers me is that no one or as far as I know that the speed of the magnetic wrapping was never been clocked. In other words, nobody knows how fast it is rotating, at the speed of light?


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Dimensional plane to Where???
Old
  (#22 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 98
   
Smile Dimensional plane to Where??? - 10-25-2005, 01:43 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The directions might be based on randomization, which is the same as chaos and unpredictability and nonlinearity. The exit ends feed into other orthogonal vortices in a different dimensional plane. What really bothers me is that no one or as far as I know that the speed of the magnetic wrapping was never been clocked. In other words, nobody knows how fast it is rotating, at the speed of light?
Many thanks Antonio,for your comments,am most
grateful to you,tell me what do you think of lies at the end of orthogonal vortices,if it is another dimensional-plane,is that plane within this universe!



many thanks michael.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#23 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
10-25-2005, 02:02 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
is that plane within this universe!
It could be another universe different from ours. See wormholes and white holes images at http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/schww.html


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#24 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
10-25-2005, 03:07 PM

The generalization to the title of post 1 is where are all the antiparticles with the exception of neutral atomic configurations of positive nucleus and negative orbitals.Neutral atomic configurations of negative nucleus and positive orbitals as that suitable for all antimatter cannot be found anywhere in the whole universe.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Is that because they are not in this universe?
Old
  (#25 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 98
   
Smile Is that because they are not in this universe? - 10-25-2005, 10:01 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The generalization to the title of post 1 is where are all the antiparticles with the exception of neutral atomic configurations of positive nucleus and negative orbitals.Neutral atomic configurations of negative nucleus and positive orbitals as that suitable for all antimatter cannot be found anywhere in the whole universe.
Is the reason they cannot be found
because they are not of this universe,or that they have no real-value or existance outside of those who first thought them up!Or are we looking in the wrong place.


kind regards michael
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
live from CERN
Old
  (#26 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
live from CERN - 10-26-2005, 01:14 PM

This website sponsored by CERN, the high energy center of Europe discusses all the different aspects of antimatter

http://livefromcern.web.cern.ch/live...rn/antimatter/


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fundamental Particles Guille Quantum Physics 10 07-08-2008 12:14 PM
wanted: willing neutrinos for cold fusion AntonioLao General Physics 3 02-24-2006 12:37 PM
mass independence AntonioLao Quantum Physics 27 02-06-2006 02:15 PM
Neutrinos have mass, that means ... Mike 5 General Discussion 14 12-02-2005 06:06 AM
Neutrinos mms General Physics 3 07-14-2005 04:57 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com