Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29
  1. #21
    The Observer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,140
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    25
    Thanked 146x in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    59

    Re: Some remark ( maybe crazy).

    That sounds very profound Lloyd; coming from the credibility of an economist.
    David

  2. #22
    2nd degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    312
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 7x in 7 Posts
    Rep Power
    24

    Re: Some remark ( maybe crazy).

    Quote Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie View Post

    David, why don't you explain to us exactly where in the real physical universe, em waves, and wave interferences(as such) turn into real solid object matter?___Physically Where? Not only has no-one on this board explained where this process takes place, or what scientific prime mover, moves fundamental waves, no-one in the entire physics community has, either.
    Lloyd
    The topic Lloyd mentioned above is almost as paradoxical as the famous one "Why there is something rather than nothing?"
    If someone can solve the former one, that person has the potential to solve the other one.

    Really, they must be the issues handled by a proclaimed TOE.

    Best Regards. Bottomlander

  3. #23
    Brown Belt
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    153
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
    Rep Power
    27

    Re: Some remark ( maybe crazy).

    The formula E=Mc^2 continues to providethe answers to Physics.
    Why? Because:
    1.
    Classic physics says the energy and mass are two different
    parametres of particle.
    2.
    SRT/QT says mass and energy are equivalent parametres
    of particle.
    Which theory is correct?
    The both theories are correct, because every of them
    observes and explains different particles.
    SRT/QT explains behaviour of photon/electron, and
    Classic physics observes all another particles (objects).
    3.
    The formula E=Mc^2 belongs to some particle.
    My opinion about this formula is:
    It is not importent how you call this particle.
    You want, call it "energy " or "mass ".
    You want, call it "daimonis "(like Socrates),
    or "idea "(like Plato), or "thing in itself " (like Kant),
    or "monada " (like Leibniz), or "dear friend" (like in Vedas),
    or "soul" (like in religion), or "photon " (like in science).
    One thing is only importent, that this particle has potential
    (rest)power: c^2.But this particle cannot be at rest all the time.
    Some time it must be active. How can it be active?
    1.
    Using one of its inner impulse (Planck,s)the particle
    moves straight with speed c=1 (it is a corpuscular, which
    doesn,t make waves).
    2.
    Using another of its inner impulse (Goudsmit/Ulenbeck)
    the particle turns around its diametr and created waves.
    And then we can call it an "electron" or "tachyon".
    But if you want you can call it "my dog".
    It is not importent. It is importent that this "dog"
    or "soul" saves you, and is importent that you also
    pay attention to "your dear friend".
    ==================================

  4. #24
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    5,807
    Blog Entries
    62
    Thanks Given
    3,838
    Thanked 3,462x in 2,168 Posts
    Rep Power
    89

    Re: Some remark ( maybe crazy).

    The two thermal states of matter/motion are profound, are they not...?

    The #1 law of the universe___All matter expands as all light slows...

    Lloyd
    "To develop the skill of correct thinking is in the first place to learn what you have to disregard. In order to go on, you have to know what to leave out; this is the essence of effective thinking." Kurt Godel
    "Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live." Albert Einstein
    "The uncertainty principle is an absolute, finite, universal constant." L.G.
    "The tick-tick-tick of the caesium atom is a sliding-time-scaler constant of all finite universal motion." L.G.

  5. #25
    The Observer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,140
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    25
    Thanked 146x in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    59

    Re: Some remark ( maybe crazy).

    Too often our thinking is influence by our senses. We think in terms of hot or cold, hard or soft, big or small, wet or dry, and light and dark. Get out of your fleshy human box and see reality.
    David

  6. #26
    Brown Belt
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    153
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
    Rep Power
    27

    Re: Some remark ( maybe crazy).

    Quote Originally Posted by dleviwing View Post
    Too often our thinking is influence by our senses. We think in terms of hot or cold, hard or soft, big or small, wet or dry, and light and dark. Get out of your fleshy human box and see reality.
    =========================
    Get out of our " human box" and see reality is not easy.
    To reach it , .......... it is very hard work.
    ====================

  7. #27
    MJA
    MJA is offline
    9th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,745
    Thanks Given
    113
    Thanked 154x in 101 Posts
    Rep Power
    39

    Re: Some remark ( maybe crazy).

    Quote Originally Posted by socratus View Post
    =========================
    Get out of our " human box" and see reality is not easy.
    To reach it , .......... it is very hard work.
    ====================
    Perhaps the truth or reality or TOE., is more easy than thought!

    MJA
    The truth of everything is less than one inch,
    it is only equal and the lion is one.
    One is free when the door is opened,
    education has the key.
    =

  8. #28
    The Observer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,140
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    25
    Thanked 146x in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    59

    Re: Some remark ( maybe crazy).

    Quote Originally Posted by socratus View Post
    =========================
    Get out of our " human box" and see reality is not easy.
    To reach it , .......... it is very hard work.
    ====================
    On that I must agree socratus; the incredible amount of indoctrinations and false knowledge brainwashing is a major obstacle along that path. The human brain is capable of seeing without the use of sight. Use the power of thought.
    David

  9. #29
    Brown Belt
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    153
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
    Rep Power
    27

    Re: Some remark ( maybe crazy).

    To understand something we need logical thought.
    But not always.
    ==========
    We are full of emotions and thoughts.
    Our brain is endless noisy ocean. Try to stop this noise
    of ocean on some seconds. Maybe, using all your will-power
    you will do it. But it is nothing. Because you must stop this noise
    of your ocean without power. Is it easy?
    ===============
    The business of the ocean be noisy.
    And the business of the brain to think.
    And this is OK. But sometimes we must stop this business.
    Why?
    Because different winds make the ocean be noisy.
    And different programms, educations,ideologies....etc
    make our brain be noisy. And we lose ourself in this ocean of noise.
    ==========
    We are not ocean, and we are not brain/computer.
    We are not machines, not programming robots, not zombies.
    We are something another. And we must now : who we are,
    " who am I ?".
    =============

 

 
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. I THINK...(but you might think I'm crazy...)
    By psycho_preteen0711 in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-25-2006, 05:21 AM
  2. playing with the constants
    By Marko in forum General Physics
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-09-2006, 03:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top