[cosvis]

Hi Pat, Lloyd and all,

I followed your discussions with interest and you have good speculations which still need to be proven. Pat, in my view, "ideas" are quite different from photons and physical reality; they are not bound by physical laws but belong to the rational or philosophical perspective of reality. In my view the effects of photons or quanta could move faster than the speed of light when viewed in the fifth dimension, where time is nil. The effect of gravity in this dimension would be instantaneous throughout the universe; there is no need to speculate about a graviton particle. I would agree that in the fifth dimension , information could possibly be transmitted faster than the speed of light but to me this still needs to be proven.

To me Lloyd, the speed of light is still a constant in the universe from the very beginning. If however, it can be proven by your theory of DSR, that the speed of light has or can be altered, than I would have to accept it. But until it is proven it would remain only a speculation, although it would explain some physical problems.

I do not think, Pat, that you could call my theory of the universe as: "a black hole that seeps". I strongly believe that there existed from the very beginning a finite quantity of energy, as light or quanta particles in the formation of a black hole that does not and cannot explode or loose any of its energy by means of seeping. There also existed at the very beginning all the universal laws that govern the universe according to which the universe is evolving.

The first eternal evolutionary process is the formation of matter and anti-matter which I speculate to occur at the event horizon of the universe. At this point matter and anti matter are permanently separated from each other keeping a beautiful symmmetry. I do not know how this division and symmetry between the matter and anti matter occurs, but I feel it does occur at the event horizon. In my theory the universe does not expand nor contract but remains steady, including both matter and antimatter.

Yours Cosvis.

[Profpat]

Hi Cosvis and all,

Cosvis, I forget does your theory address particle formation? In other words how the electron, proton, and neutron were formed.

Also do you believe all known 4 forces were independently present throughout, no 1 singular force to break down to the 4.

Best to all,

Pat

[cosvis]

Hi Pat and all,

I speculated and accepted the theory of Stephen Hawking that at the event horizon of a black hole, particles and antiparticles are produced. This theory I thought could possibly be an explanation of how matter and antimatter is formed from pure energy. I did not persue the study of the formation of subatomic and atomic particles but would rather leave that to the physicists, since I feel I do not have enough knowledge in that field. I theorise that may be the basic subatomic particles neutrons, protons and electrons are produced first and these are formed into the most common atoms of hydrogen and nitrogen and eventually into all the other elements.

Similarly with the different forces, I speculated that gravity from the virtual particles of the quanta, was the first universal force opperating in the universe, that held the universe together in a black hole formation. As matter and antimatter were formed and thus, the subatomic and atomic particles, the other forces came into operation. This was part of the eternal evolutionary process according to which the universe is evolving. The other forces could not have been in operation before the materials was formed in which these forces are operating.

The evolutionary process, I feel, is for ever in the sense that matter and antimatter is continuously being formed as matter and antimatter is continuously being reverted back to pure energy. As energy is continuously been converted, but never lost nor created, the evolutinary process must go on for ever. Thus not only planets and stars are born, have a life time and then burn up, so also galaxies are formed have a life time and then revert back to energy. There seems to be a contiuous evolutionary process operating in the universe.

Yours Cosvis

[cosvis]

Hi Pat and all,

I just want to share with you some ideas I had about the universe. The eternal evolving universe that I propose is like an atom. An atom has a neucleus consisting of protons and neutrons and these particles in turn have even more basic elements like quarks and may be even other elements. All these subatomic paticles and even the more basic elements are all composed of quanta particles. There are kinetic and gravitational forces acting within the quarks and the other more fundamental elements and between these elements, and these form a subatomic particle like the proton or neutron.

It could be that the quark and the other more fundamental elements cannot escape the protons and neutrons because they may be in a black hole formation. As far as I can remember the proton subatomic particle has a weak neuclear force acting within it to combine an electron and a proton. There are strong neuclear forces acting between the protons and neutrons that hold them together in the neucleus. The neucleus itself in an atom, could possibly be in a black hole formation containing a positive electrical charge with negative electrons orbiting it at different levels.

In this view you would have all the four basic forces in operation. The gravitational force is acting on the quanta level; the weak neuclear force is acting on the subatomic level eg. inside the proton subatomic particle; the neuclear force acting between the subatomic particles within the neucleus; and the electron magnetic force acting on the electron level between the electrons and the neucleus.

I propose that our universe is like an atom in the sense that the world within the black hole uninverse is like the world within the neucleus of an atom which has sub atomic particles and others. If we regard the matter within the universe as being possive than all the matter outside the neucleus is negative, and so the material outside the event horizon of the universe is negative, or made of antimatter. We know that an atom has at least two radius, the radius of inner neucleus and the radius of the whole atom itself including the neucleus and all the different levels of the electrons circulating around the neucleus. Thus the eternal evolving universe could be composed of an inner matter world operative within the event horizon of a black hole; and an outer antimatter world circulating the black-hole universe like the electrons circulating the neucleus of an atom. It would certainly have a symmetry and would not be so extraordinary because we have the same basic structure in every atom.

Yours Cosvis

[cosvis]

Hi to all,

When Albert Einstein first proposed his general theory of relativity, he thought that the universe was static and thus he introduced a new mathematical term know as the cosmological constant. This term proposed a natural tension in space which would enable the universe to expand or contract even if there was no matter present. However, when scientists thought that they had discovered definite evidences that the universe was expanding, he dropped the term and even thought that it was one of his greatest mistakes.

In my theory of the eternal evolving universe, I propose that the universe is like an atom and that the inner nucleus is like a black hole made up of matter and radiant energy, while the outer part of the universe consisted of antimatter and radiant energy. In my theory the universe is not expanding and the evidences that the universe was expanding could be explained by different natural phenomenas. e.g. The redshift of light coming from distant galaxies could be due to a universal gravitational effect, rather than due to a Doppler effect; and the universal background radiation of the universe was evidence to the universal temperature of a black hole universe, rather than an echo of the beginning of the Big Bang universe.

In my theory I also proposed that the basic element of the universe is the quantum particle that could not be created nor distroyed, that it had a constant quantity of energy, a Planck constant, and that it had virtual mass, and consisted of two equal but opposite gravitational and kinetic forces and energies in a string formation. The two equal and opposite kinetic and gravitational forces makes the quantum particle constantly move at the speed of light and it has a constant gravitational force due to its virtual mass that makes the particle react gravitationally with other matter and quanta particles. The constant kinetical force of the quantum particle tends to force the particle to constantly move in a straight line and thus force the universe to expand where as the constant gravitational force of the quantum particle tends to force the universe to remain in a black hole formation.

According to my theory, Einstein's cosmological constant could possibly be right, since the universe is constant or static and there are two opposite universal forces acting in the universe that keeps the inner part of the universe in the formation of a black hole due to its gravitational force and it is preventing it to collapse into a singularity again due to the constant pressure of the universe to expand. In other words the universe is eternal and will continue to evolve according to all the evolutionary forces and physical principles operating in the universe, for ever.

What do you think? Could there possibly be some truth in it?

Yours Cosvis.

[cosvis]

Hi to all,

Albert Eistein predicted a curvature of space time of the universe and that this curvature was due to the density of matter observed in the universe. Most scientists have accepted this prediction but are still uncertain whether the universe had a positive curvature which would make the universe a close universe with a definite radius; or whether the universe had a negative curvature which would make the universe to expand and thus it would be infinite; or whether the universe would be an open universe and so would be spatially flat and would be infinite in both space or time.

In my theory of an eternal evolving universe, the universe would definitely be curved and so it would be a closed universe with a definite radius. The curvature of space time would not only be due to the density of matter in the universe but also due to all the radiant energies in the universe because all matter and radiant energies are made of the same basic element the quantum particle. Each quantum particle has a virtual mass which has a gravitational effect on its surroundings.

Since the whole universe can be seen like a vast ocean of radiant light or quanta particles, there exist an universal, constant gravitational force in the universe. It is due to this universal constant gravitational force that radiant light travelling through this force is red shifted according to the amount of time it travels. I like to speculate that the red shift of the light travelling through the universal constant gravitational force of the universe, is evidence that the space time of the universe has a curvature. This is supported by the fact that light coming from distant galaxies is bent or redshifted when passing a gravitational mass like the sun.

Yours Cosvis.

[cosvis]

Hi to all,

I recently read articles about various mysteries of the universe. One of the idea talked about a "braneworld" of tiny black holes scattered throughout the universe that formed gravity waves and they also talked about an anti-gravitational force that forced the universe to expand. I thought how these mysteries could be explained by my eternal evolving universe theory. They also talked about the vacuum space in the universe to be filled by a bubbling brew of virtual subatomic particles and about the neutrino particle.

According to my theory the basic and fundamental element is a quantum particle which consists of two equal but opposite gravitational and kinetic forces in a wave or string structure. The gravitational force of the quanta particles hold the universe together and thus one could regard them as gravity waves. The kinetic force of the quanta particles forces the particles to continuously move at a speed of light and this force contiuously tries to make the universe to expand. This could be regarded as the anti gavitational force acting in the universe that causes the universe to expand.

I also speculated that the quantum particle which is the smallest possible particle of energy, is in a virtual black hole formation. It is virtual because it moves at the speed of light and at this speed its size is zero according to Einstein special law of relativity. Since these quanta particles fill up the universe they could be regarded to be the "bubbling brew of virtual subatomic particles that fill up the vacuum of empty space." They can be regarded as being the braneworld of black holes that form both the gravitational waves and the anti gravitational force.

The Neutrinos according to scientists, are electrical neutral mass-less elementary particles formed in the nuclear processes in star's cores or in supernova explosions. They are very difficult to detect because they can pass through large quantities of matter without significant absorption. According to my theory, these neutrinos could be bundles of quanta particles that move together but they were not formed in the normal production of subatomic particles which have also electrical charges. These neurinos particles would be virtual and would not have nonzero mass, in other words they would be mass-less, but they would still have virtual mass because that is one of the basic elements of quanta particles, according to my theory.

Yours Cosvis.

[cosvis]

Hi to all,

Some years ago I wrote a book that I called "Cosmic Vision", which unfortunately, I have not been able to publish but I would like to share part of it with you. The "Cosmic Vision" is really my TOE theory of everything and I have divided it into five parts: Part I is "A Threefold Cosmos"; Part II is "The Physical Cosmos."; Part III is "The Evolving Cosmos."; Part VI is "The Transcending Cosmos.": and Part V is "The New Era." If I could share with you here slowly bit by bit "Part II".

"The Physical Cosmos."

"A Study of the Physical Universe."

Scientists have discovered many of the empirical laws but there are still many physical phenomena for which there are no sure answers and all these reveal the mystery of the vast cosmos. By applying fundamental physical theories like the electromagnetic, the quantum and the Einstein's relativity theories, the search to find a grand unifying principle continues. This principle governs the four basic forces of nature namely: gravity, the electromagnetic, the nuclear and the weak forces. An attempt is made to give a novel interpretation of the unifying force theory, and to apply this to the physical cosmos.

To be continued.

Yours Cosvis.

[cosvis]

Hi to all,

To continue with Part II., "The Physical Cosmos", " A study Of The Physical Universe."

The basic element of the uninverse is finite energy which is quantified in the form of quantum that consists of electro-magnetic forces and conserved gravitational and kinetic energies. It moves at a constant velocity of light and according to the Einstein's time dilation principle, its physical time is zero. According to the law of conservation of momentum and energy, it cannot be created and destroyed and this is complementary to the transcendent truth that creation is an eternal continuous act. Energy has no relativity gravitational mass because its velocity is that of light, but it must have non-relativity graviational and inertial mass because it has momentum and it is affected by the gravitational force of matter. If the gravitational force of matter is strong enough it can be captured into a black-hole. The non-relativity gravitational mass of light or its virtual mass, could be the missing mass in the universe because it has a gravitational cosmic effect.

The universe must have a mechanism that converts energy into matter just as matter is transformed back to energy in the nuclear fusion of stars. This mechanism might be black- holes, or it might be natural plasma states in the universe which could be formed from separation of the electro-magnetic forces that make up energy. These plasma states could be the cosmic backing factories that transform energy into sub-atomic particles like the electrons, protons and neutrons. The basic structures of sub-atomic particles could also be tiny black-holes and this could be a basis of a grand universal force theory. The sub-atomic particles are formed into atoms, molecules and these are collected into proto-galaxies, galaxies, stars, planets and moons. This formation process is continuous because matter is also continuously changed back into energy.

To be continued; please feel free to ask questions or express your ideas.

Yours Cosvis.

[N0B0DY]

It has been repeatedly demonstrated in high-energy experiments that photonic collisions create both matter and antimatter, and their annihilation creates both energy and dark energy. Implying a self-sustaining relative barrage.