Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > Cosmology
Reload this Page Cyclic Universe
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: Cyclic Universe
Old
  (#101 (permalink))
9th degree Black Belt
Lloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura about
 
Lloyd Gillespie's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,579
Thanks Given: 114
Thanked 45x in 43 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 26
   
Re: Cyclic Universe - 11-14-2007, 01:59 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by dipayankar View Post
If it is a cyclic universe, then my question is where did the first matter come from. If it is not a cyclic universe, then was matter / energy created from nothing???
Dipayankar, as you have been told many times, matter and energy can neither be created, nor destroyed___therefore; by scientific logic, it is absolutely required to be eternally present, in some fundamental substance state...

If you start respecting the fundamental laws of physics, the quest becomes much clearer and simpler... The law I stated above is the first law of thermodynamics. Einstein respected this law, greatly, as do all serious physicists/scientists... All science is founded on the proven, and provable repeatability, of these fundamental laws... The interpretation is the problem, not the fundamental laws...

Lloyd


"To develop the skill of correct thinking is in the first place to learn what you have to disregard. In order to go on, you have to know what to leave out; this is the essence of effective thinking." Kurt Godel
"Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live." Albert Einstein
"The uncertainty principle is an absolute, finite, universal constant." L.G.
"The tick-tick-tick of the cesium atom is a sliding-time-scaler constant of all finite universal motion." L.G.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Cyclic Universe
Old
  (#102 (permalink))
9th degree Black Belt
N0B0DY has a spectacular aura about
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,941
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 110x in 104 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep Power: 27
   
Re: Cyclic Universe - 11-14-2007, 03:24 PM

I think that you are correct in your assessment, Dip, but not that energy is created from nothing. E0 = F^3 and m = E0/c^2, so the "nothing" is representative of zero restmass and then energy is equal to absolute one.

The problem is that the velocity of light is not absolute, so both energy and mass are non-absolute; fractionally inversely-proportionate to "infinity."

This link - http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/ance-sq.html - might "prove" to you that you already know the answer, Dip.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to N0B0DY For This Useful Post:
PoPpAScience (11-15-2007)
Re: Cyclic Universe
Old
  (#103 (permalink))
Seeker of the unknown
PoPpAScience is a jewel in the rough
 
PoPpAScience's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 212
Thanks Given: 126
Thanked 93x in 69 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rep Power: 14
   
Awards Showcase
3rd Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Cyclic Universe - 11-15-2007, 03:16 AM

I'm strictly asking a question, it is either completely dumb or very inquisitive. But I need to ask with such knowlageble minds in front of me.
Has there been any theories, or work on formulas that might speculate that Gravity is only the effect of one, or all of the attractive forces that operate in the quantum world. Let's say, that as the total of weak/strong forces in a growing collective group is increased, so will the attractive force called gravity? Let's say again, if the total collective strong force in a given galaxy A, is more then a nearby Galaxy B with a lesser total, would Galaxy A have a stronger attractive force (gravity)? What I'm getting at is, if anyone has done work on speculating if Gravity is only a word, for the effect of very high totals of nuclear forces.


Allen.

"Paradox of Potential popped Aware." ~Allen Barrow

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." ~Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955

"Condemnation without Investagation is the Heigth of Ignorance" ~Albert Einstein

"In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." ~Galileo Galilei.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Cyclic Universe
Old
  (#104 (permalink))
Blue Belt
force5 will become famous soon enough
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 102
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 4x in 2 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2004
Rep Power: 18
   
Re: Cyclic Universe - 11-15-2007, 03:28 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by dipayankar View Post
If it is a cyclic universe, then my question is where did the first matter come from. If it is not a cyclic universe, then was matter / energy created from nothing???
Your question "where did the fundamental substance come from?" Lloyd and Dave have already addressed this issue with the only possible answer.

John
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Cyclic Universe
Old
  (#105 (permalink))
Master
neutralino has a spectacular aura about
 
neutralino's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 736
Thanks Given: 31
Thanked 114x in 97 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rep Power: 12
   
Awards Showcase
1st Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Cyclic Universe - 11-15-2007, 04:46 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by PoPpAScience View Post
I'm strictly asking a question, it is either completely dumb or very inquisitive. But I need to ask with such knowlageble minds in front of me.
Has there been any theories, or work on formulas that might speculate that Gravity is only the effect of one, or all of the attractive forces that operate in the quantum world. Let's say, that as the total of weak/strong forces in a growing collective group is increased, so will the attractive force called gravity? Let's say again, if the total collective strong force in a given galaxy A, is more then a nearby Galaxy B with a lesser total, would Galaxy A have a stronger attractive force (gravity)? What I'm getting at is, if anyone has done work on speculating if Gravity is only a word, for the effect of very high totals of nuclear forces.
The gravitational force acts on all scales, that is, its range is infinite, whereas the nuclear forces only act on scales less than the diameter of the nucleus of an atom. Therefore I don't see how one can propose linking the two on mascroscopic levels.


~neutralino

If you haven't found something strange during the day, it hasn't been much of a day - John A. Wheeler.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Cyclic Universe
Old
  (#106 (permalink))
9th degree Black Belt
N0B0DY has a spectacular aura about
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,941
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 110x in 104 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep Power: 27
   
Re: Cyclic Universe - 11-15-2007, 05:22 AM

Could the two be linked at the strong-force level, neutralino? Could the gravitational force act like the strong force at that level? If not, why not?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Cyclic Universe
Old
  (#107 (permalink))
9th degree Black Belt
N0B0DY has a spectacular aura about
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,941
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 110x in 104 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep Power: 27
   
Re: Cyclic Universe - 11-15-2007, 05:28 AM

I don't know about Dave, but I think Lloyd has proposed the infinite FS contracts over time to create a finite singularity which explodes like a nuke. The contraction is due to the extremely cold temperatures of the FS, and it makes alot of sense. Yet it can only work if the universe is finite, not infinite.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Cyclic Universe
Old
  (#108 (permalink))
Master
neutralino has a spectacular aura about
 
neutralino's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 736
Thanks Given: 31
Thanked 114x in 97 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rep Power: 12
   
Awards Showcase
1st Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Cyclic Universe - 11-15-2007, 05:29 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY View Post
Could the two be linked at the strong-force level, neutralino? Could the gravitational force act like the strong force at that level? If not, why not?
I don't see how it could, since the gravitational force is much much weaker on subatomic scales than the strong nuclear force.


~neutralino

If you haven't found something strange during the day, it hasn't been much of a day - John A. Wheeler.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Cyclic Universe
Old
  (#109 (permalink))
9th degree Black Belt
N0B0DY has a spectacular aura about
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,941
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 110x in 104 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep Power: 27
   
Re: Cyclic Universe - 11-15-2007, 05:37 AM

What if the strong force isn't as strong as thought, and the coulomb force is responsible for keeping the nuclei together?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Cyclic Universe
Old
  (#110 (permalink))
Master
neutralino has a spectacular aura about
 
neutralino's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 736
Thanks Given: 31
Thanked 114x in 97 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rep Power: 12
   
Awards Showcase
1st Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Cyclic Universe - 11-15-2007, 05:43 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY View Post
What if the strong force isn't as strong as thought, and the coulomb force is responsible for keeping the nuclei together?
The Coulomb force inside the nucleus is repulsive, since the nucleus consists of protons (with positive charge) and nothing with negative charge. Thus, it can't be responsible for holding the nuclei together.


~neutralino

If you haven't found something strange during the day, it hasn't been much of a day - John A. Wheeler.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com