[davidgow77]

I have a solution for this "singularity problem." The answer is that space must be propagated in proportion to the energy that constitues matter (remember that in the early stages of inflation, energy is formless in the primordial soup). In this way it is easy to see that the energy density is of the universe is fixed per cubic meter. In this way, the energy present in the universe increases in proportion to the age of the universe (which I take from WMAP to be 13.7 billion years) which is also in proportion to the volume of the universe. The volume of the universe can thus be described as being negative energy which is measured as -8.168 J per cubic meter. In this respect, we have supersymmetry because positive energy is all the energy in matter, dark matter etc, and the negative energy is all the space.


DG

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by StirkWagner I mean no disrespect but people like you who really think they understand it all really know pratically nothing just like the rest of us.

computational facts dont't require any understanding unless you doubt the equations and math equations don't lie but the basic assumptions can still be wrong. There still are no foolproof theories and all of them have their limitation. Take Newton's law of universal gravitation, if the distance between two particles is zero, the attracting force become infinite. All physicists agree this make no sense and this is exactly what happens at the singularity of BB. To sidestep this problem, Stephen Hawking postulated the no boundary theorem. No cosmologists dare to venture beyond the singularity or any talk about happens before the BB.

[battybat]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao another misconception is that BB has no detectable center. The CMB photons come from every possible directions and another mystery is the homogeneity and isotropy of the universe.

Antonio.
Your first sentence above implies that BB has a detectable centre. Then CMB radiation, as it was generated soon after the BB, must come from near that centre. The fact that it comes from every direction is another very good argument against the feasibility of BB!

Battybat

[davidgow77]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao Take Newton's law of universal gravitation, if the distance between two particles is zero, the attracting force become infinite. All physicists agree this make no sense and this is exactly what happens at the singularity of BB.

My theory explains this away by hioghlighting the fact that the space between two objects is a determining factor in the strength of the force of gravity experienced between them. Put in very simple terms, if there is no space between the particles, then they must, philosophically at least, be regarded as one particle.

Check out my theory. Download the pdf (much better than the online version) from TOE Library>>Physics>>Identifying the Gravitational Constant

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by davidgow77 Put in very simple terms, if there is no space between the particles, then they must, philosophically at least, be regarded as one particle.

Let's start with the basic building blocks of matter: the quarks and leptons. Experimentally, these are point particles with no extensions hence they are zero-dimensional. Yet they have energy, mass, electric charge, magnetic dipole moment, electric dipole moment, spin, helicity, etc which made up their measurable properties and detectable by experiments.

Now, let's take the electron (positron) as our test particle. Can we isolate one electron for our study? Yes. This was done by Hans G. Dehmelt and he received the 1989 Nobel Prize in Physics. Still his experiment cannot determine whether the electron has extension. It is still a point particle. All its measurable properties can be precisely detected except its physical dimension. But both the electric moment and magnetic moment require a small distance separation between the charges or magnetic poles (no monopole yet found by experiment). So, the separation is agreed among theorists to be zero (or the existence of null vectors, these are called vector bosons in gauge symmetry, force carriers). But for concept of mass, the separation can still be zero for the vector boson called graviton (zero mass) and the scalar boson called the Higgs (massive particle). Both of these still cannot be detected by experiments. But they must exist in equations of theories for the sake of consistency.

[davidgow77]

Thus space should be a plenum of vector bosons (gravitions), or a scalar field. Quantum theory predicts that gravitons should be everywhere, and indeed they are. They are space, with the smallest definable amount of space being a cubed planck volume.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by davidgow77 Thus space should be a plenum of vector bosons (gravitions), or a scalar field.

graviton is a vector boson for a quantized vector field of gravity

Higgs particle is a scalar boson for a quantized scalar field of the true vacuum.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by davidgow77 They are space, with the smallest definable amount of space being a cubed planck volume.

i'm trying to remember writing the math expression for your statement. And i might have already done so in physicsforum.com

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by battybat Your first sentence above implies that BB has a detectable centre. Then CMB radiation, as it was generated soon after the BB, must come from near that centre. The fact that it comes from every direction is another very good argument against the feasibility of BB!

the BB is not really an explosion of matter or energy. its an explosion of space (or spacetime structures to be more precise). When spacetime explodes, parts of it enumerable structures formed both matter and energy. Once matter and energy are formed, they cannot explode any farther hence matter and energy become stabilized forming superclusters, clusters, galaxies, stars, planets, etc. But the remaining spacetime structures that wouldnt able to form matter and energy continue to explode up to the present epoch of the universe.

[davidgow77]

I think I can explain why CMB comes from all directions, and not from a big bang centre. Energy is not propagated from a source, but from the outer-layer (the horizon) of the universe. If there is zero outside the universe, then as this zero splits into negative energy (space) and positive energy (energy), it would show that the positive energy which once complimented the negative energy seems to vacate the space... leaving the CMB as a fingerprint. Propagation of energy and space must then come from the perimiter (the spherical outer membrane) of the universe and not from the centre. This explains the horizon problem as it shows conclusively that areas of space need not be in communication with each other, but share the common feature that every definable point in the space-time metric must have at one stage or another been at the perimeter of the universe.

DG