It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > Cosmology
Reload this Page Redshift: A Hypothetical Question
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Redshift: A Hypothetical Question
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Seeker of the unknown
PoPpAScience will become famous soon enoughPoPpAScience will become famous soon enoughPoPpAScience will become famous soon enoughPoPpAScience will become famous soon enough
 
PoPpAScience's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 147
Thanks Given: 62
Thanked 32x in 30 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rep Power: 10
   
Awards Showcase
3rd Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Redshift: A Hypothetical Question - 11-25-2007, 05:10 PM

I have a hypothetical question; now this is just a mind teaser.

If say, there was a centre to the Universe, and all the Galaxies were being drawn towards it. Would they still register as red shifted, if they were accelerating as they get ever more closer to the centre?

I have thought about this for a long time, maybe as long as 25 years. I am finally asking someones opinion, that may have a strong understanding of 'red shifts'.

Moderator note: this has been split off from the thread on primordial black holes


Allen.

Paradox of Potential popped Aware.

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955

"In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." -- Galileo Galilei.

Last edited by neutralino : 11-25-2007 at 07:07 PM. Reason: made opening post for new thread
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Did the big bang spawn trillions of black holes?
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Master
neutralino has a spectacular aura aboutneutralino has a spectacular aura aboutneutralino has a spectacular aura aboutneutralino has a spectacular aura aboutneutralino has a spectacular aura aboutneutralino has a spectacular aura about
 
neutralino's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 718
Thanks Given: 29
Thanked 103x in 88 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rep Power: 11
   
Awards Showcase
1st Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Did the big bang spawn trillions of black holes? - 11-25-2007, 06:42 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by PoPpAScience View Post
Neutralino; I have a hypothetical question for you. Now this is just a mind teaser.

If say, there was a centre to the Universe, and all the Galaxies were being drawn towards it. Would they still register as red shifted, if they were accelerating as they get ever more closer to the centre?

I have thought about this for a long time, maybe as long as 25 years. I am finally asking someones opinion, that may have a strong understanding of 'red shifts'.
If there was a centre of the universe then there are two distinct positions in which we could be. Firstly, we could be at the centre of the universe. Now, we would see all galaxies around us accelerating towards us. This would result in a blueshift for every galaxy. The other position we could be is somewhere else away from the centre of the universe. Here, we would see a mixture: the light from some galaxies would be blueshifted, as they would be moving towards us, and some would be redshifted as they would be moving away from us.

For anyone else reading, who may not be 100% sure, I should point out that there is no centre of the universe, and so this is all hypothetical.


~neutralino

If you haven't found something strange during the day, it hasn't been much of a day - John A. Wheeler.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Redshift: A Hypothetical Question
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Grandmaster
Profpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to behold
 
Profpat's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,050
Thanks Given: 283
Thanked 496x in 455 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Rep Power: 45
   
Re: Redshift: A Hypothetical Question - 11-25-2007, 07:42 PM

I understand that they say there is no center Neutralino, But why not? Given the universe has mass why wouldn't there be a center of gravity. I understand it would forever be changing from frame of reference to frame of reference, but logically I would still think there should be one.

Please help.

Pat

P.S CONGRATULATIONS ON BEING A MODERATOR

Last edited by Profpat : 11-25-2007 at 07:58 PM. Reason: added PS spelling
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Redshift: A Hypothetical Question
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
Master
neutralino has a spectacular aura aboutneutralino has a spectacular aura aboutneutralino has a spectacular aura aboutneutralino has a spectacular aura aboutneutralino has a spectacular aura aboutneutralino has a spectacular aura about
 
neutralino's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 718
Thanks Given: 29
Thanked 103x in 88 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rep Power: 11
   
Awards Showcase
1st Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Redshift: A Hypothetical Question - 11-25-2007, 07:59 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Profpat View Post
I understand that they say there is no center Neutralino, But why not? Given the universe has mass why wouldn't there be a center of gravity. I understand it would forever be changing from frame of reference to frame of reference, but logically I would still think there should be one.

Please help.

Pat
The short answer is that if the universe had a centre, then it would violate the cosmological principle. The cosmological principle basically says that we do not live in a special place in the universe; i.e. everywhere else is pretty much the same as where we are. If this didn't hold, then we wouldn't really be able to do cosmology, since the topology of the spacetime could be vastly different here than the rest of the universe. So, we say that the cosmological principle holds. There is, of course, vast evidence for this. See here for a fuller discussion.

And, thanks for your congratulations! It's the members that I should be thanking, though, for the interesting posts I've seen to respond to!


~neutralino

If you haven't found something strange during the day, it hasn't been much of a day - John A. Wheeler.

Last edited by neutralino : 11-25-2007 at 08:02 PM. Reason: respond to ps
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Redshift: A Hypothetical Question
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Grandmaster
Profpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to behold
 
Profpat's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,050
Thanks Given: 283
Thanked 496x in 455 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Rep Power: 45
   
Re: Redshift: A Hypothetical Question - 11-25-2007, 08:38 PM

Thanks for the quick response I'm going to have to read your link in detail.

Best,

Pat
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Redshift: A Hypothetical Question
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
Seeker of the unknown
PoPpAScience will become famous soon enoughPoPpAScience will become famous soon enoughPoPpAScience will become famous soon enoughPoPpAScience will become famous soon enough
 
PoPpAScience's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 147
Thanks Given: 62
Thanked 32x in 30 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rep Power: 10
   
Awards Showcase
3rd Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Redshift: A Hypothetical Question - 11-25-2007, 09:53 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by neutralino View Post
The short answer is that if the universe had a centre, then it would violate the cosmological principle. The cosmological principle basically says that we do not live in a special place in the universe; i.e. everywhere else is pretty much the same as where we are. If this didn't hold, then we wouldn't really be able to do cosmology, since the topology of the spacetime could be vastly different here than the rest of the universe. So, we say that the cosmological principle holds. There is, of course, vast evidence for this. See here for a fuller discussion.

And, thanks for your congratulations! It's the members that I should be thanking, though, for the interesting posts I've seen to respond to!
Thanks Neutralino for the link. And starting this tread for me.

Do you realize that you gave me a link that says, if I was to state that Galaxies where residing to a centre, that my theory is as possible as any other. For all theories are limited to the scale of our observable Universe.

I especially like the example of Galaxies A, B, and C. If the words 'moving' were changed to 'receding', and the Galaxies were said to travel at an ever increasing speed as they move closer to the center, would not the example work the same.


Allen.

Paradox of Potential popped Aware.

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955

"In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." -- Galileo Galilei.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com