[AntonioLao]

but

such that the sum of is equal to the total energy of the universe

[SimpleKid18]

Hello there, can you please tell me more or give me a site to go on that explains the LOE's? Why does it go up in 3's? Are there only 12? If I can find the reason behind this, it would be a major major breakthrough in the development of my TOE. Tahnks alot

[AntonioLao]

the only LOE that I can describe is the one we are in. Our spatial dimension is set at 3 adding time as 1 more dimension we have spacetime. But 4D spacetime is really 1 dimensional curve of a Higher LOE. String theories propose more dimensions but they are compactified at the infinitesimal region. So, string theories might be just describing lower LOEs below our zero dimension. This is just my guess.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

but

such that the sum of is equal to the total energy of the universe

Is there an equation relating H with h-bar (planck's constant)?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE

Is there an equation relating H with h-bar?

The time dependent of H expressed as square of changes in position and momentum is related to the square of h-bar by Heisenberg's original form of the uncertainty principle.

Please note that the following form of H is time independent

[mkirkpatrick]

I am Alpha(Cosmic Ideation-intelligence)and Omega(cosmic substance-matter)
What ,then is "primordial substance",that mysterious object of which Alchemy
was ever talking,and which became the subject of philosophical speculation in
every age?What can itbe finally,even in its phenomenal pre-differentiation?Even
that is all in manifested nature and -nothing to our senses.We touch and do not
feelit;we look at it without seeing it;we breathe it and do not perceive it;we
hear it and smell it without the smallest cognition that it is there;for itis in every molecule of that which in our illusion and ignorance we regard as Matter in any
of its states,or conceive as a feeling,a thought,an emotion,In short,it is the vehicle,of every possible phenomenon,whether physical,mental,or psychic.
We are in a cycle not an eternal one(although not far off!!!)Where there is an
Alpha-Ideation and we become-then when this idea has outrun its course,the
idea is withdrawn and Omega completes the task?We Fade into obscuration,and
await further instruction?


kind regards michael.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

The time dependent of H expressed as square of changes in position and momentum is related to the square of h-bar by Heisenberg's original form of the uncertainty principle.

Please note that the following form of H is time independent

What form (s) of H are time independent?

By the way, the sqaure of changes in position and momentum and sqaure of h-bar, do they have something in common with the E squared?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE

What form (s) of H are time independent?

When the generalized coordinates are composed only of forces and distances without the time parameters.

Originally Posted by GUILLE

By the way, the sqaure of changes in position and momentum and sqaure of h-bar, do they have something in common with the E squared?

Force squared is really momentum squared divided by time squared. So, if forces are replaced by momentum then the square of h-bar is proportional to the square of energy. But what is the physical meaning of time squared?

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

When the generalized coordinates are composed only of forces and distances without the time parameters.

Force squared is really momentum squared divided by time squared. So, if forces are replaced by momentum then the square of h-bar is proportional to the square of energy. But what is the physical meaning of time squared?

Interesting, it makes one think. Maybe quanta07 can help us here.

Well, up to what I know, taylor series is:



If a=0 it becomes the Maclaurin series. Then, if we make x be the number of time units, it will be t^n which is time squared. And, this is:



Which is non-taylor series (not evena function anymore). If we make x be t for time, then we can see that it's not only about t^2, but any exponent of it. And also it's permutations.

But this is even more abstract, it's physical representation is too complicated to imagen it, for me.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE

then we can see that it's not only about t^2, but any exponent of it.

distance over time squared is defined as acceleration in physics. What we need is to define some kind of absolute acceleration. exponent of time higher than 2 still does not have any definable concept in physics.