It isn't a matter of choice, I am too curious about the universe to simply accept a lack of knowledge.
It isn't a matter of choice, I am too curious about the universe to simply accept a lack of knowledge.
Emily: Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Stage Manager: No. *pauses* The physicists and mathematicians, maybe they do some.
Newton's lack of knowledge why the apple falls on his head allowed him to invent the mathematics of the calculus but the religious Leibniz also invented it at about the same time. They spent most of their lives fighting for priority and originality.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
I'm not as worried about originality.
If it's true, it's true.
I'd be more worried if I was the only person who had a specific idea, why no one else had it.
Myself, I've considered some aspect or another of most of the theories that I have read here, and elsewhere.
I didn't come and post my first theory of everything, or my second, or my tenth, or twentieth, I've lost count of the ideas that I've considered, developed, extended, extrapolated, discussed, deconstructed, discarded, and found all over again.
You can learn a lot in 20 years if you spend the entire time learning.
Emily: Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Stage Manager: No. *pauses* The physicists and mathematicians, maybe they do some.
Then it's the West meets the East between heaven and earth in order to move forward or backward for complete directional invariance of absolute rest.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
Absolute rest would be the state outside of a universe.
Emily: Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Stage Manager: No. *pauses* The physicists and mathematicians, maybe they do some.
Or similarly at the end of eternity.Originally Posted by Max™
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
That would be equivalent to absolute motion of the first kind or the second kind or the third kind not two of a kind but three of a kind or four of a kind. Actually 8 of a kind.Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
A universe doesn't exist for eternity, no more than a fruit sits upon a tree forever.
The outside of the universe is a place where our sense of time and distance are alien concepts, perhaps meaningless even.
How do you describe a forest when you've only been inside of a tree?
Emily: Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Stage Manager: No. *pauses* The physicists and mathematicians, maybe they do some.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)