+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Hawking's 1997 Vintage BigBang StatusQuo

  1. #1
    Grandmaster RascalPuff is just really nice RascalPuff is just really nice RascalPuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,023
    Blog Entries
    128
    Thanks Given
    993
    Thanked 745x in 420 Posts
    Rep Power
    35

    Awards Showcase

    Hawking's 1997 Vintage BigBang StatusQuo

    Who says, 'There's no Common-Center Beginning'?


    "Our sun at the center of our solar system is just one star among billions in the Milky Way galaxy. Around us are billions and billions of galaxies. Where could this entire universe come from? Was it always this way or did the universe have a beginning? The church has always believed that the universe came from a moment of creation - a time when the universe began. Meanwhile, scientists developed two theories: the Big Bang and the Steady State theories. In this century, science has come to understand how the universe began from a tiny point, fifteen billion years ago. No matter how incredible it sounds, it seems that the church's ideas of a moment of creation were right from the beginning."

    - STEPHEN HAWKING'S UNIVERSE,
    Volume I, Program II: The Big Bang
    Copyright 1997

    ------------------------------------

    Meanwhile, the Big Bang advocates, apologists and revisionarys, have hewn out rationalizations for why there is presently no common center from which 'the expanding universe', is expanding... ('The center is everywhere'.) And why the observed expansion is accelerating.


    Refer 'Quintessence' and the (stealthy) reinstatement of Einstein's Cosmological Constant in LCDM (Lambda Cosmological Dark Matter) - Friedmann and others have pointed out that the CC may expand or contract 'at the slightest provocation'. Ostensibly, as the only known force that increases with distance - it explains why the spatially expanding universe is accelerating.

    Under these convuluted circumstances, a theoretical return to a Steady State universe seems imminent. Moreover, background radiation (where the past is more dense than the present) is the signature of any expanding universe scenario.

    - RP

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to RascalPuff For This Useful Post:

    Lloyd Gillespie (02-05-2010)

  3. #2
    Grandmaster austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    8,121
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    814
    Thanked 1,616x in 1,078 Posts
    Rep Power
    134

    Awards Showcase

    Re: Hawking's 1997 Vintage BigBang StatusQuo

    As nothing can come from Nothing, the new arrangements of somethings must come from…

    …that same old something, or were at least of that same old something if we consider pair production of plus and minus particles.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts