Dark energy is in front of your eyes!

[vacuum-mechanics]

OK, it's the normal TOE, being the only TOE, but superbly presented.

Dear austintorn@aol.com,

Thanks, now I think I could get your idea.

And, beyond the initial expansion, such as now, with accelerated expansion, what is called dark energy that causes expansion, is actually the vacuum energy of the vacuum medium, as always, which is why it exists from the smallest to the largest scope!

Indeed, the new concept would able to answer your questions in which I will gradually explain it next.

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[vacuum-mechanics]

UNIVERSAL INSURANCE POLICY

The underwritten Underwriter
Of this universal wave of matter
Covers all loss and liability,
Guaranteeing payment,
By dipping into Possibility,
Issuing both the credit and the debit.

Dear austintorn@aol.com,

What is it?

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

[austintorn@aol.com]

It is the possibility/potential inherent in the vacuum medium to emit particles in pairs, or whatevr, in some such way that is true to the law of the conservation of energy.

[vacuum-mechanics]

It is the possibility/potential inherent in the vacuum medium to emit particles in pairs, or whatevr, in some such way that is true to the law of the conservation of energy.

Dear austintorn@aol.com,

I am not so happy with magical interpretation of conventional quantum mechanics, for example, particle-antiparticle pair such as electron-positron pair! It seems that they (mainstream physicist) easily concluded that the electron of electron-positron pair is the same thing as the classical one. Normal electron particle is so stable; how could it easily combine with positron and then convert into photons!

In fact, there is another scientific interpretation which is more rational such as the vertex theory, in which it interpretedelectron-positron pair as opposite of rotational vertex! And I have explained it in “Completed quantum mechanical theory” in my website, and also will be (simple) talked in topic “Anybody could understand quantum mechanics” now in the quantum forum.

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear friends,

Now, let us return to explain that vacuum medium (our new ether) is existed by using a simple scientific experiment as show in the diagram;



The concept used in this experiment is an fundamental physics; it is about the magnetic field B generated by a direct current flowing in a solenoid according to the formula,

B = μin [Where μ is the permeability constant, i is the feeding current and n in number of turns.]

When both two identical solenoids are feed with the same amount and same polarity of direct currents as in (a) then the sum of the generated magnetic field is double. But when the feeding currents are opposite as in (b) then the sum of the generated magnetic field is zero!

Someone may say that it is just the superposition of magnetic field vectors. Yes it is, but this is not an abstract mathematical operation (addition and subtraction). Instead, it is a real superposition ofmagnetic field energy. And the crucial point in case (b) is, where is the generated energy gone?

While we still feed the same amount of energy into both solenoids, so the created magnetic energy can not be destroyed because it means that we can violate the law of conservation of energy! The only one sensible explanation is that there is a cancellation between the opposite phases of internal rotational stress in some physical thing which existed in vacuum space. So this could be an indirect prove that there is something in empty vacuum space such as the old ether, isn’t it?

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[Graybeard]

In contrast, my new concept is that the universe was created from Vacuum medium (i.e. the primordial substance) forming to be the infrastructure of our space-time. When the universe is expanding (orcontracting) then Vacuum medium is also increasing (ordecreasing) at the same time; no Vacuum medium no universe!

Dear Nimit ... Questions

When the Universe is expanding the vacuum medium is also expanding .... ??? It does not have to follow ... the universe could be expanding within the primordial substance ... and the primordial substance would not have to register this expansion .... in other words the expansion could be subjective to the 'internal' Universe ?

Dear friends,

Now, let us return to explain that vacuum medium (our new ether) is existed by using a simple scientific experiment as show in the diagram;

Attachment 1083

The concept used in this experiment is an fundamental physics; it is about the magnetic field B generated by a direct current flowing in a solenoid according to the formula,

Dear Nimit ... Questions

A direct current flowing in a solenoid will not generate a magnetic field .... do you mean an alternating current ?

When both two identical solenoids are feed with the same amount and same polarity of direct currents as in (a) then the sum of the generated magnetic field is double. But when the feeding currents are opposite as in (b) then the sum of the generated magnetic field is zero!

Someone may say that it is just the superposition of magnetic field vectors. Yes it is, but this is not an abstract mathematical operation (addition and subtraction). Instead, it is a real superposition ofmagnetic field energy. And the crucial point in case (b) is, where is the generated energy gone?

While we still feed the same amount of energy into both solenoids, so the created magnetic energy can not be destroyed because it means that we can violate the law of conservation of energy!

The only one sensible explanation is that there is a cancellation between the opposite phases of internal rotational stress in some physical thing which existed in vacuum space.

So this could be an indirect prove that there is something in empty vacuum space such as the old ether, isn’t it?

Questions.

I don't see this as a violation of the Laws of Conservation. The 'apparent' missing energy, or 'cancelled' energy is exchanged for thermal and mechanical stresses in the two energy sources. The batteries.

Should you bring alternators on line and try to synchronise them while they are out of phase .... you either stall one or both or you snap the crankshaft in one or the other .... this ensures that energy is conserved ??

cool bananas ... greg

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear Nimit ... Questions

Dear Graybeard,

Thanks for your creative comment, I am glad to discuss deeper in technical detail which is quite rarely happened in most scientific forum!

When the Universe is expanding the vacuum medium is also expanding .... ??? It does not have to follow ... the universe could be expanding within the primordial substance ... and the primordial substance would not have to register this expansion .... in other words the expansion could be subjective to the 'internal' Universe ?

Sorry, I am not so clear about your explanation, would you please give in more detail. Anyway, I will try to answer by adding more detail that “the universe expands by the increasing volume of vacuum medium while its density is constant”.

A direct current flowing in a solenoid will not generate a magnetic field .... do you mean an alternating current ?

It seems that you are confusing between magnetostatic field (in our case) and time varying magnetic field in transformer’s action. It is easy to clear the point by looking at the action of a power transformer which is working with alternating current supply. But we do not have any direct current transformers which is something like our solenoids experiment!

I don't see this as a violation of the Laws of Conservation. The 'apparent' missing energy, or 'cancelled' energy is exchanged for thermal and mechanical stresses in the two energy sources. The batteries.

Actually, both solenoid and battery have their own small resistance which will generate heat, but we can neglected when compare to the generated magnetostatic field. Anyway, please be reminded that in both cases, (a) and (b), the heat loss is the same!

Should you bring alternators on line and try to synchronise them while they are out of phase .... you either stall one or both or you snap the crankshaft in one or the other .... this ensures that energy is conserved ??

Normally if we have a small capacity (alternating current) generator, two of them could be connected in parallel to get larger amount of supply current. Anyway we have to be careful for keeping synchronizing them, i.e. both the generator output current must be in phase, in which then we will get double amount of output current.

In principle, for the out of phase connection, not only that you will get smaller amount of output current, but it is very dangerous, especially when both generator supply current are opposite phase! Fully out of phase connection is not only that you get NO output current, but you will damage your generators too!

By the way, we have one analogous simple and familiar scientific experiment for an indirect prove of air’s medium; it is an experiment with sound interference as show in the diagram.



In (a), sound waves were feed from loudspeaker into the tube and dividing into two equal branches, and then they combine again before going out at the output. If the length of the two branches is equal, then what we got at the output is the same level of sound waves as the input.

In (b), the two branches’ length is different with a halve wavelength of the sound wave, then ideally, the sound level at the output is zero due to the destructive interference of the waves from the two branches.

Now it is easy to explain where the input sound waves energy was gone! Actually the input energy can not be destroyed because it will violate the principle of conservation of energy. So the only possible way for the disappeared energy was used to cancel internal stress which occurred in air medium, wasn’t it?

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[Graybeard]

Dear Nimit ... its possible the confusion has been caused by a mistake in your drawing.



The drawing is hard to see .... but if you follow the direction of current flow in the bottom right diagram then you have the positive of (battery)A connected to the positive of (battery)B. Same goes for the neutrals. Therefore there will be no current flow.

re: your quote .. While we still feed the same amount of energy into both solenoids, so the created magnetic energy can not be destroyed because it means that we can violate the law of conservation of energy!

The only one sensible explanation is that there is a cancellation between the opposite phases of internal rotational stress in some physical thing which existed in vacuum space.

I am not sure what you are saying here but I see no 'disappearance of energy ... according to your drawing either there is no flow or alternatively you have a short which requires all the energy ? Also the directional arrows appear incorrect in your top right diagram as well ?

cool bananas ... greg

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear Nimit ... its possible the confusion has been caused by a mistake in your drawing.

Dear Graybeard,

Sorry, you are right, there are errors in the drawings and I will tell my programmer to correct them in my paper! Actually the drawing was used in explaining for people who is not so easy to get the idea with the experiment. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[Graybeard]

In (a), sound waves were feed from loudspeaker into the tube and dividing into two equal branches, and then they combine again before going out at the output. If the length of the two branches is equal, then what we got at the output is the same level of sound waves as the input.

In (b), the two branches’ length is different with a halve wavelength of the sound wave, then ideally, the sound level at the output is zero due to the destructive interference of the waves from the two branches.



Now it is easy to explain where the input sound waves energy was gone! Actually the input energy can not be destroyed because it will violate the principle of conservation of energy. So the only possible way for the disappeared energy was used to cancel internal stress which occurred in air medium, wasn’t it?

Hi Nimit ....... questions.


re: your example of the sound waves .... In still air the air molecules are travelling in random chaotic directions, each at approximately 900 Km/hr ..... because they are traveling in all directions we measure no 'wind' or 'sound' ... they are colliding and canceling each others momentum and swapping energy packets ...

The net result is no sound ... but the energy quantity is present.

..... but if you apply a set amount of energy that causes the molecules to all start to travel in a uniform direction ... then you have a sound wave ...... if the majority of them can be made to travel in a single direction then their average speed will be around 700-800 km/hr and they will break thru the sound barrier ?

But they're (total energy + the energy applied to create the direction) is still accounted for. If you now separate the jet-stream and cause it to collide with itself then the amount of energy required to create the collision will equal the amount of energy required to create the initial uniform direction ... and the molecules will become random directional again ..... but they're energy levels will not have changed ... ??

I don't see any loss of energy ??

cool bananas ... greg