Dark energy is in front of your eyes!

[vacuum-mechanics]

Hi Nimit ....... questions.


re: your example of the sound waves .... In still air the air molecules are travelling in random chaotic directions, each at approximately 900 Km/hr ..... because they are traveling in all directions we measure no 'wind' or 'sound' ... they are colliding and canceling each others momentum and swapping energy packets ...

The net result is no sound ... but the energy quantity is present.

..... but if you apply a set amount of energy that causes the molecules to all start to travel in a uniform direction ... then you have a sound wave ...... if the majority of them can be made to travel in a single direction then their average speed will be around 700-800 km/hr and they will break thru the sound barrier ?

But they're (total energy + the energy applied to create the direction) is still accounted for. If you now separate the jet-stream and cause it to collide with itself then the amount of energy required to create the collision will equal the amount of energy required to create the initial uniform direction ... and the molecules will become random directional again ..... but they're energy levels will not have changed ... ??

I don't see any loss of energy ??

Dear Graybeard,

In physics of gas (such as air), we treat it as continuous medium and work with its macroscopic properties, so average molecules momentum (velocity) of air was manifested as its pressure!

Now, when we applied an external sound energy to air medium, the propagation of sound wave is occurred. This is the process of compression and rarefaction of air medium pressure (pressure above and below its normal pressure), i.e. the mechanism is stress-strain action in air medium!

In (a) which is a constructive interference of wave (addition of compression and addition of rarefaction) occur at the output, and then we get output sound energy. In (b) which is a destructive interference of wave occur, i.e. the energy from one compression part cancels the energy of another rarefaction part. So get NO we get output sound energy!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[Graybeard]

Dear Graybeard,

In physics of gas (such as air), we treat it as continuous medium and work with its macroscopic properties, so average molecules momentum (velocity) of air was manifested as its pressure!

Now, when we applied an external sound energy to air medium, the propagation of sound wave is occurred. This is the process of compression and rarefaction of air medium pressure (pressure above and below its normal pressure), i.e. the mechanism is stress-strain action in air medium!

In (a) which is a constructive interference of wave (addition of compression and addition of rarefaction) occur at the output, and then we get output sound energy. In (b) which is a destructive interference of wave occur, i.e. the energy from one compression part cancels the energy of another rarefaction part. So get NO we get output sound energy!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

Hi Nimit ....... the energy of the gas is still the same after the addition of the constructive and then the destructive ??

cool bananas ... greg

[Graybeard]

Hi Nimit

CLICK

cool bananas ... greg

[vacuum-mechanics]

the energy of the gas is still the same after the addition of the constructive and then the destructive ??

Dear Graybeard,

Yes, in both cases the total energy is the same, i.e. the total energy is conserved! What different is that we can directly see where the input energy is gone in (a), while it seems that the input energy is disappeared in (b). But we know that energy can not be created (from nothing) or be destroyed, otherwise we will not facing world’s future energy crisis!

The climax point is that in (b) the unseen input energy was used to clam down (counteract) the variation of air pressure (compression and rarefaction) and return to the normal pressure. So this is the reason that there is no output sound energy!

By the way, the concept of the seeming disappeared of the input energy is the same for the two-solenoid experiment talked early. There, in the lower right drawing of the diagram in which the generated magnetic field energy seems disappeared, but actually it is not! We can check it by switch off one of the two batteries, and then we will see that the generated magnetic field from the other battery is coming back.

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

[Graybeard]

By the way, the concept of the seeming disappeared of the input energy is the same for the two-solenoid experiment talked early. There, in the lower right drawing of the diagram in which the generated magnetic field energy seems disappeared, but actually it is not! We can check it by switch off one of the two batteries, and then we will see that the generated magnetic field from the other battery is coming back.

Hi Nimit ...

Ok .... I can see where your going ..... what is the dark energy interacting with ??

cool bananas ... greg

[vacuum-mechanics]

what is the dark energy interacting with ??

Dear Graybeard,

Up to now, we may say that we have proved the existence of vacuum medium! Then, what is the relation betweenvacuum medium and dark energy? Actually, they do not relate to each other, instead both of them are the same thing, but why? And before answering the question, let us summarize about what we have talked (and will give more detail) about vacuum medium.

First we have said early that vacuum medium is the infrastructure of the universe’s space, or we could say that the vacuum medium is the raw material builds up our universe - vacuum medium universe (the diagram shown in post # 5 p. 1)!

Second, as mentioned in post # 5 thatvacuum medium have gravity energy (internal contraction force) as its intrinsic property, which is contrast to conventional matter that said nothing about the attraction between materials mass! So vacuum medium is primordial substance which is also the origin of all kind of materials mass in our universe (and will be talked later)!

Third, in some technical detail, vacuum medium is a uniform, transparent and continuous medium which have a peculiar mechanical property. It is very thin in mass density (23.3 x 10^ -28 Kg/m^3) so it is permeable by all matters almost without any observed resistance. But it has very large elastic coefficient and sensitive to shear force (rotational force) while not to compressive or longitudinal force!

In the next post we will see how the above information of vacuum medium could solve the questionabout dark energy (and also dark matter).

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear Graybeard and friends,

To see that vacuum medium and dark energy (also dark matter) is the same thing, let us first recall how their concepts were arisen. For thedark matter (as we mentioned early) it was responsible for the abnormal orbital rotational velocity of the galaxies (according to Newton law of gravity). While the dark energy was responsible for the accelerate expanding of the universe because the total observable matters (including dark matter) is not enough to do so (according to vacuum medium)!

Cosmologists have calculated that the critical mass density required to do the acceleration expanding of our universe is about 60 x 10^ -28 Kg/m^3. And they have found the total mass observed (including dark matter) is only about 30% of the critical mass density, so the main remaining part is the proposed dark energy! But the final crucial problem is that what is the dark energy?

To answer the problem, let us reconsider Einstein general relativity which is the foundation of our modern cosmology (science of the universe). All of us know that conventionally it is non-ether based theory! So it is easy to understand why mainstreams cosmologists can not imagine how there is such thing as dark energy in an empty space!

Anyway, recentlyFrank Wilczek(a Nobel Prize winner in physics 2004) has point out the existence of the ether according tohis recent book - “The Lightness of Being (Mass, Ether, and the Unification of forces)”. This gives us more confidence for the existence of vacuum medium; even in more detail its technical property is different, but it is the same concept that there is something physically existed!

Next post, we will explain how vacuum medium could improve Einstein general relativity into ether based theory, and then show that it is indeed the same thing as dark energy!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[Graybeard]

While we still feed the same amount of energy into both solenoids, so the created magnetic energy can not be destroyed because it means that we can violate the law of conservation of energy! The only one sensible explanation is that there is a cancellation between the opposite phases of internal rotational stress in some physical thing which existed in vacuum space. So this could be an indirect prove that there is something in empty vacuum space such as the old ether, isn’t it?

Ok .... a Yes ..... so far, so good

Up to now, we may say that we have proved the existence of vacuum medium! Then, what is the relation between vacuum medium and dark energy? Actually, they do not relate to each other, instead both of them are the same thing, but why? And before answering the question, let us summarize about what we have talked (and will give more detail) about vacuum medium.

First we have said early that vacuum medium is the infrastructure of the universe’s space, or we could say that the vacuum medium is the raw material builds up our universe - vacuum medium universe (the diagram shown in post # 5 p. 1)!

OK ... Yes, still following you closely.

Second, as mentioned in post # 5 that vacuum medium have gravity energy (internal contraction force) as its intrinsic property, which is contrast to conventional matter that said nothing about the attraction between materials mass! So vacuum medium is primordial substance which is also the origin of all kind of materials mass in our universe (and will be talked later)!

You have said in post 5 that the Vacuum-Medium is positive and Gravity is negative, but no supporting reasons ??

So our new concept is that vacuum medium is the infrastructure of our universe; we may say that the universe was created from vacuum medium energy! While the existing of vacuum medium is positive energy, its intrinsic gravity (i.e. internal contraction force energy which holds every infinitesimal part together) is negative energy. Then the conservation of the total energy of our universe was preserved!

This could be a good supposition, but we don't know it for fact ??

Third, in some technical detail, vacuum medium is a uniform, transparent and continuous medium which have a peculiar mechanical property. It is very thin in mass density (23.3 x 10^ -28 Kg/m^3) so it is permeable by all matters almost without any observed resistance. But it has very large elastic coefficient and sensitive to shear force while not to compressive or longitudinal force (rotational force) !

How do you support these attributes for the Vacuum-Medium ??? Could I say that you are using attributes that are useful to the theory, but not proven facts ??

Dear Graybeard and friends,

To see that vacuum medium and dark energy (also dark matter) is the same thing, let us first recall how their concepts were arisen. For the dark matter (as we mentioned early) it was responsible for the abnormal orbital rotational velocity of the galaxies (according to Newton law of gravity). While the dark energy was responsible for the accelerate expanding of the universe because the total observable matters (including dark matter) is not enough to do so (according to vacuum medium)!

Cosmologists have calculated that the critical mass density required to do the acceleration expanding of our universe is about 60 x 10^ -28 Kg/m^3. And they have found the total mass observed (including dark matter) is only about 30% of the critical mass density, so the main remaining part is the proposed dark energy! But the final crucial problem is that what is the dark energy?

Dear Nimit .... You claim that the Vacuum Medium, Dark Energy, and Dark Matter are all the same thing, and that you can show it .... but you don't show how the connection is made ?? Before moving on to the 'crucial problem of what is Dark Energy' ... please explain why Dark Matter, Dark Energy and the Vacuum Medium are the same force or substance ??

So our new concept is that vacuum medium is the infrastructure of our universe; we may say that the universe was created from vacuum medium energy!

Yes, logical

While the existing of vacuum medium is positive energy, its intrinsic gravity (i.e. internal contraction force energy which holds every infinitesimal parts together) is negative energy. Then the conservation of the total energy of our universe was preserved!

Maybe, and maybe right .... but how do you support it ?

To answer the problem, let us reconsider Einstein general relativity which is the foundation of our modern cosmology (science of the universe). All of us know that conventionally it is non-ether based theory! So it is easy to understand why mainstreams cosmologists can not imagine how there is such thing as dark energy in an empty space!

Anyway, recently Frank Wilczek(a Nobel Prize winner in physics 2004) has point out the existence of the ether according to his recent book - “The Lightness of Being (Mass, Ether, and the Unification of forces)”. This gives us more confidence for the existence of vacuum medium; even in more detail its technical property is different, but it is the same concept that there is something physically existed!

Next post, we will explain how vacuum medium could improve Einstein general relativity into ether based theory, and then show that it is indeed the same thing as dark energy!

This doesn't really answer the problem as you claim .... but I am happy reading and will continue to question .. if you like ??

cool bananas ... greg

[vacuum-mechanics]

You have said in post 5 that the Vacuum-Medium is positive and Gravity is negative, but no supporting reasons ??

This could be a good supposition, but we don't know it for fact ??

How do you support these attributes for the Vacuum-Medium ??? Could I say that you are using attributes that are useful to the theory, but not proven facts ??

My concept was based on the conservation of energy and mass, and to consider it, we have to compare to the hot big bang theory which is violate the conservation principle!

Dear Nimit .... You claim that the Vacuum Medium, Dark Energy, and Dark Matter are all the same thing, and that you can show it .... but you don't show how the connection is made ?? Before moving on to the 'crucial problem of what is Dark Energy' ... please explain why Dark Matter, Dark Energy and the Vacuum Medium are the same force or substance ??

This doesn't really answer the problem as you claim ....

Dear Graybeard,

Please wait, we have to go step by step, this is not yet the conclusion!

...but I am happy reading and will continue to question .. if you like ??

Yes, please go on! Anyway, would you please question by question each time, which will be easy for me to answer.

Sincerely,

Nimit.

[vacuum-mechanics]

...................

Next post, we will explain how vacuum medium could improve Einstein general relativity into ether based theory, and then show that it is indeed the same thing as dark energy!

Dear Graybeard and friends,

Now, let us consider some detail of conventional Einstein general relativity via its mathematical formula i.e. (gravity) field equation. And for someone who is familiar with the general relativity would know that it is describe the connection between geometry of the universe (Einstein tensor) and the total energy within (energy – momentum tensor). (Detail technical explanation could be found in “Completed Einstein general relativity” in my website.)

Anyway, before Einstein derived the field equation mentioned, his firstfield equation was based on static universe in which the equation was included with cosmological constant term. Later he found that the universe is expanding, so it is not necessary to keep the constant (in order to prevent the instability (collapse) of the universe!

By the way, Einstein has commented his firstfield equation (which included the cosmological constant) as being his great mistake because there is no need to have anything such as thecosmological constant term in the equation. But we have mentioned early that the critical mass density which was calculated from the field equation (withoutcosmological constant term) could not correspond to the total universe mass observed! Then what is wrong?

In next post, we will see howthecosmological constant is relate to in theether based (vacuum medium) general relativity, and also how it relate to our searching dark energy.

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com