Dark energy is in front of your eyes!

[melanie]

In other words, the tape measure we use inside Doctor Who's Telephone Box is not applicable to what is outside Dr Who's telephone box ?

[Graybeard]

Iz dat a pic of you mel ...... ??? lolol


greg

[Fivedoughnut]

Dear Fivedoughnut,

What is it?

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

Wave propagation accounts for all forces - therefore "it" can be many things. With the photon, "it" is electromagnetism.

[Mr. Ignorant]

Gas Rich Galaxies Confirm Prediction of Modified Gravity Theory



Does this mean that dark matter and dark energy don't exist? What does this make of string theory? I'm not sure, but does string theory rely on dark matter and dark energy as it relies on supersymmetry?

[vacuum-mechanics]

Gas Rich Galaxies Confirm Prediction of Modified Gravity Theory



Does this mean that dark matter and dark energy don't exist? What does this make of string theory? I'm not sure, but does string theory rely on dark matter and dark energy as it relies on supersymmetry?

Dear Mr. ignorant,

- According to the news attached, what they said in the later part is “…since we can’t see dark matter”. But according to my paper – we can see it!

- My theory is not related to any string theory which involve in extra dimensions - I don’t believe in extra dimensions!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[Mr. Ignorant]

Dear Mr. ignorant,

- According to the news attached, what they said in the later part is “…since we can’t see dark matter”. But according to my paper – we can see it!

- My theory is not related to any string theory which involve in extra dimensions - I don’t believe in extra dimensions!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

I've skimmed your website a little, but I can't make much sense out of it yet. By the way, isn't vaccuum energy the same as dark energy? Why are there no extra dimensions in your theory?

[vacuum-mechanics]

I've skimmed your website a little, but I can't make much sense out of it yet.

Give me an example in which part of what articles that you could not got the sense!

By the way, isn't vaccuum energy the same as dark energy?

Yes, it is!

Why are there no extra dimensions in your theory?

Before answering why there is no extra dimension, it is better to ask you why I should need extra dimensions in my theory!

Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

[Mr. Ignorant]

It's been a while. I've given your website a second try. It makes more sense to me now. Perhaps I haven't given it enough attention before. I think you have a good point, but I feel like there's missing something that most physicists have already "understood". What you say is so obvious that I've a lot of trouble imagining that someone missed it.

Edit: Oh yes, I think I see some flaw now.



"Gravitational force via nothing" is misleading, because there's the graviton hypothesis.

By the way, I know little about physics. I'm not doing this because I want to attack your non-standard theory, but because I want to sharpen my mind and help you out (you're like a better version of myself).

[vacuum-mechanics]

"Gravitational force via nothing" is misleading, because there's the graviton hypothesis.

It seems that you was misguided by the concept “force is the action of throwing boson (field) particle” in modern physics. Graviton was invented following the concept of photon which was used to represent the force of electric field between charge particles. Anyway there is a serious problem in the concept of force field particle, for example, Feynman’s father had asked him, how photon was created from an exited atom, and he (a physics Nobel Prize winner) could not answer because there is no explanation how and why it is something like that! (Please see some detail in my paper “Completed Maxwell electromagnetic field theory”.)

By the way, I know little about physics. I'm not doing this because I want to attack your non-standard theory, but because I want to sharpen my mind and help you out (you're like a better version of myself).

The crucial problem of (what which was called as) standard (physical) theory is that actually it is not so “standard”. In my opinion, standard theory should be the theory which can explain how and why (mechanism) it works, not only describing by mathematical formula! Remember that physics is the science of nature, how could science be progress without understanding?

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[Graybeard]

Feynman’s father had asked him, how photon was created from an exited atom, and he (a physics Nobel Prize winner) could not answer

Standard theory should be the theory which can explain how and why (mechanism) it works, not only describing by mathematical formula!

Hi Nimit .....

Balanced against this criticism is the predictive ability of the Standard Theory which is correct. And, if you think about it .... there is no pre-requirement of what a theory should do or be .... except that it can make predictions.

Remember that physics is the science of nature, how could science be progress without understanding

But it does make progress without bothering to make explanations. Explanations of physical phenomena at the macro-level is understood by the evolution of life and the requirements for that evolution. But the micro level ... we have not evolved to conceptualise.

I am starting to think that Dark Matter may be Neutrinos ?

cool bananas ... greg