"the empirical nature of our eternal universe"

[humanbydefault]

“THE EMPIRICAL NATURE OF OUR UNIVERSE”


BY MIGUEL DE ZAYAS

Even a child can tell you what a universe is in his or her own words of course:

-“It’s a big space filled with galaxies and a lot of stuff in it”.

Among “the stuff” there is something without nothing could be explained and that is ENERGY.

Einstein proposed the relationship between matter and energy decades ago and we know the conversion thanks to it… However if matter (mass) comes from “condensed energy” (which seems somewhat logical by now) where is energy coming from in the first place?

I bet the first thing you learned when you received your first lesson in Physics was the old proverb “Energy can neither be ‘created’ nor ‘destroyed’ only transformed”… and of course as always happens with tradition: you believed it.

What would you say if I told you that ENERGY is the direct result of the action of something called Reality imposing its ‘universal rules’ on empty 3 dimensional space?

I know… You’d say “–This guy is nuts!” (I can’t say I blame you).

In the course of May-Jun and July of 2010 I have self-published four books. Those books have only one thing in common and that is that there is something called objective Reality acting always everywhere (from the smallest distance you couldn’t even begin to imagine to the vast confines of the cosmos).

Using basic numbers and empirical mathematical operations on them I have reached the same conclusions over and over again:

There is a cyclical symmetry that ‘rotates’ as the consequence of a negative perturbation due to the cancellation of one set of spatial coordinates after the complete elapsed of one cycle.

As orbitals grow in space those are transformed from a perfectly circular one into elliptical ones causing space to ‘bend’ or ‘warp’ in itself. Hydrogen never decays due precisely to represent the first circular symmetry. The rest will decay in time as ENERGY interacts with Reality’s objective Physical requirements for each case.

Where is ENERGY in this “equation” you may ask?

When 3 dimensional Space cancels in itself ENERGY is created. Yes, you heard well: Created.

We’ve seen this happening “a lot” only we blame it on “Heisenberg’s probabilistic nature of the quantum world…”

We have proven (experimentally) that ‘electrons’, ‘photons’ and ‘stuff like that’ pops out from nothing disappearing again and we begin to talk about eleven dimensions and membranes etc, etc, etc.

“Black Holes” are the ‘conduit’ from where ENERGY is ‘collected’ in some especial areas of the universe to later be ‘transported’ into focal points resulting from Reality’s rules being imposed across the universe as a whole.

Stars occupy places inside galaxies and those galaxies into their own designated places due solely by the action of Reality alone.

Nothingness cancelled in an elliptical configuration with more nothingness is the empirical birth place of ENERGY.

This is (in few words) the fundament of my “Great Universal Theory”.


By Miguel De Zayas

[humanbydefault]

“The Orthogonal State of Matter and the concept of Cycles”

In my previous posting I proposed a hypothesis of mine regarding the origins of Energy as a result of an inherent perturbation after the complete elapsing of every cycle of what I came to call a “Quantum of Reality.”

Today I want to talk about the origins of the orthogonal nature of our Reality. As many of us know from earlier studies in analytic geometry, the simplest representation in 3 dimensional space of a geometrical figure with four points (set of coordinates) is the mysteriously controversial ‘Pyramid’; the simplest of all politons too.

I want you to use your imagination and try to figure out the following thought:

Let’s say that you have a small pyramid in your hands. Imagine that you could trace a perpendicular line from the very corner where all three sides coincide together at one point right to the base or opposite side making a 90 degree angle with respect to the same side where the line touches the surface.

You do the same procedure with all four vortices of the Pyramid and you are done! Now I want you to count how many points of contacts are as a consequence of the four lines… Eight, right?

If we were to consider “objects” the points of origin of those four lines (vortices) and “images” the bases or side-planes where those lines crossed them perpendicularly we have a total of 8 (eight) points.
Let’s assume for a moment that each set of coordinate is a “musical note” or a “color”. We begin our cycle at one ‘object-point’ (arbitrarily selected by you) and continue the count with its corresponding ‘image-point’ on the opposite side and keep doing the same procedure until we count to seven! Then we stop! But why we had to stop? Because without any possible explanation you could understand -other than an inherent nature of our Reality of course- we suddenly lose one complete “musical note” (color) even before arriving to the ‘point of origin’. In simple English so everyone could understand it… We were left with seven points when we needed eight to conclude counting the vortices and sides of our Pyramid!

That’s the dilemma facing our Reality and the key to understanding the paradoxically complex meaning of what Einstein named in 1905 “Relativistic effects.” Of course it happens in the vast confines of the cosmos too but it also happens and keep happening at all levels of Reality just as I have recently published in the initial pages of my book “Lex Parsimoniae.”

In the course of several weeks I’ve been talking about it and publishing all kinds of numerical demonstrations proving that no matter the empirical method employed with basic numbers they keep repeating the same message over and over again.

When I called it a dilemma (a complex paradox) it wasn’t aimed to aggregate an ingredient of sophism to the argument already inherently complex but to imply a reason that may be a little bit hard to catch.

A “Quantum of Reality” shares the same properties depicted for a quantum of energy or mass: indivisible and unobservable until it has completely elapsed [realized]. This also means that it has to elapse in a way that all eight points must cycle themselves. The cycle must complete the “octave” musical note or the spectrum of colors completely. Here is the problem though.

Pay attention to the following reasoning:

If we were left with only seven ‘musical notes’ (colors) [spatial sets of coordinates] but Reality imposes the completion of an eight points cycle, then our ‘point of origin’ will be inherently changed into a qualitatively different [set of coordinates] (color) and/or ‘musical note’ by the time a Quantum of Reality is completed. It’s called ‘perturbation’ and it’s equal to (-1). Now… Mathematics and Physics have relied on ‘Perturbation Theory’ for a long time since it was first applied by Newton while calculating the orbit of the Moon around our planet. It has been Quantum Mechanics “best ally’ in succeeding in its calculations and without it nothing could have been numerically resolved the way it has lately.

I want you to stay with me during the next analysis, please.

If Reality actually ‘works’ the way I have proposed to you a moment ago and a factor of an inherent perturbation is always present in every single cycle within every single “Quantum of Reality”, is it at least conceivable that it is this ‘weird’, ‘unobservable’ and almost ‘instantaneous’ [theoretically speaking] ‘relativistic effect’ what’s working behind the nature of our Reality and not some irrational probabilistic nature of things what lies behind all our concerns?

Is it? Is it at least conceivable for you, my friends?

A three dimensional universe is not just obvious to everyone with common sense but it is the most important Physical consideration in the understanding of the “Orthogonal State” of our Reality.

Thank you.

[Bogie]

This thought experiment of yours conveys to me the notion that though there has to be a physical explanation for the material things that we observe in the universe, the reality of the universe is not completely observable from our perspective. Are you saying there is a dimension that we cannot detect as in multiple dimension realities like spacetime or string theory? Or are you saying that the universe that we perceive in three dimensions is the total reality but there are perturbations that exist, and though we can’t detect them directly they fill out the reality for us?

I think there is a physical explanation that doesn’t require an unobservable dimension. The universe could be composed of an unobservable/undetectable substance; a universal medium that has characteristics that allow material things to become differentiated from it while at the same time they are composed of it. We are able to detect the material things to the extent that our senses reveal them but the substance of the material things is as undetectable as the universal medium.

So please clarify the perturbations and tell me if you see them as a fourth dimension or as a hidden aspect of our three dimensional reality.

[humanbydefault]

This thought experiment of yours conveys to me the notion that though there has to be a physical explanation for the material things that we observe in the universe, the reality of the universe is not completely observable from our perspective. Are you saying there is a dimension that we cannot detect as in multiple dimension realities like spacetime or string theory? Or are you saying that the universe that we perceive in three dimensions is the total reality but there are perturbations that exist, and though we can’t detect them directly they fill out the reality for us?

I think there is a physical explanation that doesn’t require an unobservable dimension. The universe could be composed of an unobservable/undetectable substance; a universal medium that has characteristics that allow material things to become differentiated from it while at the same time they are composed of it. We are able to detect the material things to the extent that our senses reveal them but the substance of the material things is as undetectable as the universal medium.

So please clarify the perturbations and tell me if you see them as a fourth dimension or as a hidden aspect of our three dimensional reality.

That is an intelligent question and I thank you for your comment.

Since the question branched itself into other issues I'll make the best to clarify it to you and the others also interested in the topic.

1] There is indeed a Physical explanation for the material universe as you put it and it could and will be (at some time) represented under one universal model. As a mather of fact I've proposed one in my books and it was based on a simple mathematical operation with basic numbers on the Square Root of 2.

2] There are more existential dimension that we cannot observe? yes. The Physical argument to support such claim is that the Theory and Model I proposed implies an inherent 'Perturbation' that causes the ability to 'locate' 'sub-atomic particles' impossible. However it is that 'inconvenience' that allows our Reality to show to us the way it is. It allows seven musical notes, seven basic colors, that same perturbation is what lies behind the 'holistic spectrum of Reality'... The spectrum obtained on the screen of the 'Double Slit Experiment', etc etc. Each cycle Reality covers from one 'octave to the next one' a new set of coordinates in space begins the new cycle and the progressive result of this relativistic phenomenon is the reason why we see 'lost' [erased from existence] two semitones in music [between Si-Do and Mi-Fa]. The same reasons Newton decided to place the seven colors in 'his wheel of fortune' where you can pinpoint the missing 'space-time' inside the circle.
Wolfgang Goethe also claim to have observe the same phenomena but in a greater scale: He actually stated that Newton only produced what happened in the borders of the 'perturbated area' conveniently manipulating the distance between the prism and the source of light.... He was absolutely right according to my views.

As for the possibility of other dimensions is only logical. If our existential dimension elapses always toward [-1] with a cumulative lose of space-time as cycles elapse in time, it is common sense that there must exist an identical (symmetrical and opposite) pPhysical process to counteract the effects of the first.

I read you idea and I rspect it but I believe that Energy, Space and time are connected in a integral 'body' if you will. Matter is the result of a cyclical and continuous conversion of energy between states due to the same causes posted above. Matter exists only how the name implies [solid] 8 times in each cycle of Reality I called it "Quantum of Reality." It is a fact that we cannot observe the process due to the high speed that process elapses but we could theoretically device the entire process by understanding the way elements (gases, metals etc.) build up their 'electronic orbits' and explaining their configurations.

You concepts sounds like Eather did in the past. For me Eather is nothing but an inherent energy present due to the presence of empty space. Funny isn't it?

"The presence of 'empty' Space" It sounds contradicting itself but it is one of the most misunderstood issues in Physics. Emptiness is an impossibility and it has never happened... never. The sole existence of a perfect vaccum causes energy to "be" and from there a whole universal process to continue for an eternity.

Thanks!

[Bogie]

That is an intelligent question and I thank you for your comment.

Since the question branched itself into other issues I'll make the best to clarify it to you and the others also interested in the topic.

1] There is indeed a Physical explanation for the material universe as you put it and it could and will be (at some time) represented under one universal model. As a mather of fact I've proposed one in my books and it was based on a simple mathematical operation with basic numbers on the Square Root of 2.

2] There are more existential dimension that we cannot observe? yes. The Physical argument to support such claim is that the Theory and Model I proposed implies an inherent 'Perturbation' that causes the ability to 'locate' 'sub-atomic particles' impossible. However it is that 'inconvenience' that allows our Reality to show to us the way it is. It allows seven musical notes, seven basic colors, that same perturbation is what lies behind the 'holistic spectrum of Reality'... The spectrum obtained on the screen of the 'Double Slit Experiment', etc etc. Each cycle Reality covers from one 'octave to the next one' a new set of coordinates in space begins the new cycle and the progressive result of this relativistic phenomenon is the reason why we see 'lost' [erased from existence] two semitones in music [between Si-Do and Mi-Fa]. The same reasons Newton decided to place the seven colors in 'his wheel of fortune' where you can pinpoint the missing 'space-time' inside the circle.
Wolfgang Goethe also claim to have observe the same phenomena but in a greater scale: He actually stated that Newton only produced what happened in the borders of the 'perturbated area' conveniently manipulating the distance between the prism and the source of light.... He was absolutely right according to my views.

As for the possibility of other dimensions is only logical. If our existential dimension elapses always toward [-1] with a cumulative lose of space-time as cycles elapse in time, it is common sense that there must exist an identical (symmetrical and opposite) pPhysical process to counteract the effects of the first.

I read you idea and I rspect it but I believe that Energy, Space and time are connected in a integral 'body' if you will. Matter is the result of a cyclical and continuous conversion of energy between states due to the same causes posted above. Matter exists only how the name implies [solid] 8 times in each cycle of Reality I called it "Quantum of Reality." It is a fact that we cannot observe the process due to the high speed that process elapses but we could theoretically device the entire process by understanding the way elements (gases, metals etc.) build up their 'electronic orbits' and explaining their configurations.

You concepts sounds like Eather did in the past. For me Eather is nothing but an inherent energy present due to the presence of empty space. Funny isn't it?

"The presence of 'empty' Space" It sounds contradicting itself but it is one of the most misunderstood issues in Physics. Emptiness is an impossibility and it has never happened... never. The sole existence of a perfect vaccum causes energy to "be" and from there a whole universal process to continue for an eternity.

Thanks!

I am a fan of logic in the face of the imponderables . If logically you can derive the nature of the universe from math, colors and notes I support your efforts. My logic is called step by step bottom up reasonable and responsible speculation using known science and accepted theory as the departure points. I find choosing or describing a cosmology a personal decision that we make individually and then compare it with other's views to see if we can improve our own.

Your view of matter has a ring to it that sounds like part of my explanation about the process that establishes the presence of mass and gravity. The similarity is in the rapidly repeating formation of high density spots. But your comparison between the universal medium and empty space is not as different as one might think. You seem to be saying that there is no empty space because of the potential of a perfect vacuum which would immediately cause that space to be filled.

With a universal medium that fills all space, the characteristic of that medium is to expand to fill all space. If you try you can see that they are the same thing, or at lease may be the same depending on what fills the space to prevent the vacuum. The universal medium fills the space in my view.

Thanks for your reply.

[humanbydefault]

And I thank yours!

I will post an article right here in this thread when I finish it. You'll love it... I know for sure. Keep in contact and wait for my next posting. until then...

God bless you.