| |
 | |
 | |
Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 5,934
| |
11-05-2005, 05:58 PM
| | smaller
Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE what is it's present value? | It is 4 times 10 to the power minus fifty two.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | The Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,278
48  | |
11-05-2005, 06:09 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao It is 4 times 10 to the power minus fifty two. | hummm......Why do scientists dedicate time to make more and more acurate this number, if it doesn't work to describe our universe?
Maybe to be prepeared to describe othe runiverses which are static? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 5,934
| |
11-05-2005, 07:24 PM
| | to be sure
Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE Why do scientists dedicate time to make more and more acurate this number | They are obsess with absolute certainty and/or 100% probability and maybe because they dont have anything better or more interesting to do.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | The Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,278
48 | |
11-06-2005, 06:00 AM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao They are obsess with absolute certainty and/or 100% probability and maybe because they dont have anything better or more interesting to do. | Well, in my opinion they do: building up the pyramid of knowledge till the top, to acheive the TOE!
This is for me the most exiting thing that a human being, insignificant, can do. | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 5,934
| |
11-06-2005, 03:29 PM
| | more perfect circle?
How accurate do we need to calculate the the decimal places of the number pi? Couldn't we just be settled and be contented with the definition that pi is the ratio of circumference to the diameter of a circle?
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | The Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,278
48 | |
11-06-2005, 03:44 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao How accurate do we need to calculate the the decimal places of the number pi? Couldn't we just be settled and be contented with the definition that pi is the ratio of circumference to the diameter of a circle? | We can. I also find stupid to look for more precise measurements.
In my other post, what I meant was that the scientists are stupid by making more accurate the cosmological constant, because they should be building up the pyramid of knowledge, to acheive the TOE. If I already had all the knowledge gained in school and university, I would be dedicating most of my time to the TOE. In 30 years time there will have been a tremendous revolution in technology, and kids won't ahve to go to school, they will be inplanted at speed of light the information. Thus, those of my age will be already proper physicists...if I had been born in the future.... | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 5,934
| |
11-06-2005, 04:31 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE and kids won't ahve to go to school, they will be inplanted at speed of light the information. | So, people like me would be out of a job and waiting in line at the unemployment office. I think, your prediction is starting to happen.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | The Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,278
48 | |
11-06-2005, 04:39 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao So, people like me would be out of a job and waiting in line at the unemployment office. I think, your prediction is starting to happen. | Well, I didn't particularlly say that. Just that when time goes by there is more ability to learn. But I never said people would learn. Imagen you are 15 years old. Would you go and put this physics information itno your brain? I don't think so, no, because most of the people of my age don't care a /*%$ about knowledge or wisdom, or about the world, or about anything apart from getting durgged. For example, the school methods are way much better know than before. But are there going to be more genius for that? Well, yes and no. There will be more genius because before there were probably many many minds that could have done incredible things to help science and philosohpy, but because of the system and society they couldn't. But the schools only make the genius-born to be genius-living, but it can't make geniuses up, it's impossible.  | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 5,934
| |
11-06-2005, 04:57 PM
| | The true cosmological constant is man inhumanity to himself. Of not wanting to be geniuses. Why can't we all be wise and smart? So that intelligent beings are all in the majority and not in the minority. Why many refuses to accept some basic ignorance? If the reverse is true, all schools would be packed to the brim.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | The Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,278
48 | |
11-06-2005, 05:07 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao The true cosmological constant is man inhumanity to himself. Of not wanting to be geniuses. Why can't we all be wise and smart? So that intelligent beings are all in the majority and not in the minority. Why many refuses to accept some basic ignorance? If the reverse is true, all schools would be packed to the brim. | Because if everybody else was an intelectual, who would do the no thought-taking works? Robots? Animals?....I doupt it.
Spain is the country with the biggest ratio in Europe of people going to universities out of the total popualtion of the country. The only good thing is that atleast many spanish young people will have a lot of education and knowledge. But, it is actually a problem to the society and civilisation of spain.
So, what is more worth: The sum of each individual mind, or the collection of all of them?
According to mathematicians, it is the same value. But this is a question in humanities, not in exact sciences. What is your answer? | | | | | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 
VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.
| |
