ToeQuest

We're going on a TOE Quest!


Register

Reply

Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,934
Blog Entries: 6
85 AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
11-06-2005, 05:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
What is your answer?
I have no answer but I have more questions. Do intelligent people realize the senselessness of wars and fighting for domination? Or is it the same smart people that dominate and enslave the troglodytes.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
11-06-2005, 05:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
I have no answer but I have more questions. Do intelligent people realize the senselessness of wars and fighting for domination? Or is it the same smart people that dominate and enslave the troglodytes.
It depends on each, I believe, this is mainlly due to their spaciotemporal position. For example, Socrates believed that slaving was neccesary for human societies to exist, whiles Russell was taken many times to jail for manifesting against war. Their opinions are afected by conditions, but their greatenesss isn't, if you don't believe this, read: Marcus Aurelius was roman emperor, whiles Epictetus was slave. And there was nearlly no spatial or temporal difference: one was born just after the other's death, and one was greek the other roman.
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,934
Blog Entries: 6
85 AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
11-06-2005, 06:01 PM
It is then the responsibility of the smart people to educate the masses without physical or mental oppressions.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
11-07-2005, 02:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
It is then the responsibility of the smart people to educate the masses without physical or mental oppressions.
Yes. But up to what point should the masses should here the already mentioned cosmic simphony, in order so that they can comprehend the misteries and wonders, but a "revolution of the masses", as the title of the best known book of the best known spanish modern philosopher said, doesn't happen?
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,934
Blog Entries: 6
85 AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
11-07-2005, 02:33 PM
approx derivation

back to the cosmological constant, it is the inverse of area but if you notice in the equation for continuous space, it can be written as the product of force and the rate of change of area. Taking the natural logarithm of ln(S) gives the lnF+ln(area)-ln(time). If F=1 then ln(F)=0. So that ln(area)-ln(time)=52ln(1/Λ). Or ln(area)-ln(time)=52ln(-Λ).
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
playing with the constants Marko General Physics 15 01-09-2006 04:48 PM
Planck's Constant unclepeacock General Physics 1 05-23-2005 05:02 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:29 AM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.