What is curved space, could we understand it?

[Graybeard]

Dear greg,

- I supposed that you refer to the standard model of particle physics.

Like other modern physics theories (relativity, quantum mechanics, Maxwell electromagnetic) in which they are workable theories, but without their physical model (mechanism which explain the theory), so they were misinterpreted!

Special theory of relativity is an example, it cannot explain why and how a moving object increases its mass, its length contraction, time dilation, etc. That why I have improved it to be “Completed special theory of relativity”, which could solve the philosophical problems!

Standard model theory is the theory without any physical model, and then what follow is that hundred of short life particles created in high energy collision. But the problem is that what these unstable particles are, why and how they were created?

For my opinion, it was misinterpreted as real particles; actually they all are disturbance parts of the disturbed vacuum medium! Now I am writing to improve it as “Completed standard model of particle physics”.

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

Hi Nimit ..... Yes .. I understand ....

The Standard model is a made up theory .... Even tho it refers to 'real' particles and 'virtual' particles ... it does not define exactly what they are ..... I also see them as a disturbance of the vacuum ...

But regardless of the way we interpret them ... or even imagine them .... they are workable theories .... neutrinios, anti-neutrinos, W+, W-, Z'zero .... were 'particles' that were imagined long before they were 'confirmed'. They were being used long before anyone knew if they existed.

But the only true test of a theory is that it makes predictions that can be experimentally confirmed. The Standard theory does this .... unfortunately it gives us no concept, no physical reality .... no way to imagine it.

So I am reading your web site to see how your concepts give a physical reality (model) to the theory.

cool bananas ... greg

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear friends,

Now let’s return to continue our topic:-

Up to now, we have seen that the modified (aether based) GTR theory can give us solution to the problem of gravity and curved space-time. Anyway there still have other mysterious unsolved problems such as dark energy and dark matter, which we also could explain it by using the new vacuum medium concept in the paper “Dark energy is in front of yours face”.

Another problem of GTR is about the speed of gravity wave, which said that it is the same as light speed. Anyway there is no explanation why it is so! Armed with the concept that light wave propagate via the oscillation in vacuum medium, then we can apply it to gravity wave as well. The reason is because any disturbance in vacuum medium will create a moving wave with constant speed c via the stress – strain relation in the medium with constant density!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear friends,

One more problem is aboutthe mechanism of what which was called as “frame-dragging” of space-time, which is the effect that a spinning object pulls space and time with it as it rotates. And recently, it was reported by Stanford and NASA researchers that the “Gravity Probe B” experiment test has confirmed the prediction of GTR.

Anyway, as mentioned early thatvacuum space in GTR is an empty space, so it has the problem about the mechanism of curved space, here the situation is the same, and we do not know how empty space could be dragged along with the rotating object? Instead if space is physical vacuum medium one, then this would be easy to visualize it work in the same way as the dragging of liquid around a rotating sphere!

By the way, it is interesting to note that there is a contradiction between the positive result of “frame-dragging” got from general theory of relativity and negative result fromspecial theory of relativity! According to aether based relativity, we know that the conventional interpretation of Michelson-Morley experiment is wrong, isn’t it?

(Detail explanation of this topic could be found in “Completed Einstein general theory of relativity, CGTR” in; www.vacuum-mechanics.com.)

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[spacedout]

The M&M experiments for measuring the speed an object has relative to the aether. Light moves at a speed relative to the aether so an experiment should show that light travels faster in one direction as to another [addition and subtraction of velocities]. The problem was that the speed of light is always the value C. The reason is that it takes more time to cross the length of a yardstick if it is moving through the aether --- c+v or c-v in the return direction. The time and distance cancel leaving the speed of light c.

|yardstick|velocity of the yardstick relative to the aether|

|--------------total time and distance------------------|

The aether is necessary for space to curve as in Einsteins general relativity. Like you say the density of the aether is the reason for gravitational pull. Gravity could also be caused by steps along a time-line path and probable blocked relocations. I like the concept of relocations along a time-line path because the steps are laid down not as a force but just making a step of choice away from the position of a present step. This is the easiest way to make a string that can't break. The universe is one recycled loop of steps in (+ or -) x,y,z directions. This also fits your theory.