Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23
  1. #21
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by subversion
    So maybe, if one photon was gravitationally bent, then another photon from the same source could overtake it?
    If they are bent by the same amount, they still would not overtake each other.
    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    what would in therory would
    happen if you fired a Photon-torpedo straight ahead of the ship?
    If I'm not mistaken, the starship never fire a photon-torpedo unless the shield is on. And the starship cannot travel at warped speed when the shield is active. But when escaping, one's intention is not to fire ahead but to fire back.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #22
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Thomas Young's double slits experiment was used to prove the wave properties of light. In this context, it can be used to prove that light from different sources will always interfere and so implying that the wavefronts of photons from from the same source will never overtake each other. See the following interactive website, demonstrating the effects of the experiment.
    http://vsg.quasihome.com/interfer.htm
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  3. #23
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    When considering the wavefronts from a single source, the leading fronts are assumed to be closed spherical surfaces. Each separated by a distance. This distance can be defined as ½ a wavelength if the concentric spheres alternately described positive and negative modes of spacetime influence. However, the existence of this distance implies the existence of two irreducible point sources as the seats of electric and magnetic fields. Radiative transfer is then due to the fact that electric metric is greater than the magnetic metric and the reverse is true for standing matter waves. When these metrics are equal then we have spacetime quantization and the speed of light is set equal to 1.

    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Mass
    By TinyTree in forum Relativity
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-15-2006, 02:27 PM
  2. The story of PHOTON as I see it
    By jessebonin in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-22-2006, 09:18 PM
  3. How does matter get its mass from the ether?
    By wisp in forum General Physics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-20-2006, 09:20 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top