with respect to each other the photons relative velocities are the following
1. When both photons are located on a straight line.
2. When both photons are located on the same plane.
3. When both photons are located on parallel planes
![]()
with respect to each other the photons relative velocities are the following
1. When both photons are located on a straight line.
2. When both photons are located on the same plane.
3. When both photons are located on parallel planes
![]()
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
This is fundamental for my photogravitational theory!
In particular, the image of the two photons in the same plane that collide. It represents just the opposite of what my process is.
Is it all valuable for gravitons as well as for photons?
How so you found the speed is the square root of (2 times the speed of light)?
Last edited by michellemfry; 01-14-2006 at 11:48 PM.
Actually it is 1.4142... times the speed of light and 1.7321... times the speed of light. Maximum for photon motion is 2c. This include the maximum universal spacetime expansion.Originally Posted by GUILLE
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Antonio;
Are you suggesting that a photon is a traveling particle of EM radiation?
The velocity of a reflected wavefront of EM radiation is 1.732.
In Relativity Einstein's equations indicate a maximum of 2c but that is due to his assumption of c as the ultimate velocity. In QM this velocity is 6.5x10^11c.
Which one do you think is right (if either), Relativity or QM?
David![]()
Dave,
The phase velocity and group velocity of a wave may exceed the speed of light, but in such cases, no energy or information actually travels faster than c. Experiments showing group velocities greater than c include that of Wang et al. (2000), who produced a laser pulse in atomic cesium gas with a group velocity of 311c. In each case, the observed superluminal propagation is not at odds with causality, and is instead a consequence of classical interference between its constituent frequency components in a region of anomalous dispersion (Wang et al. 2000).
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
From where are these tow numbers taken?Originally Posted by AntonioLao
the 1st is the square root of 2 and the 2nd is the square root of 3. They are taken from the minimum-maximum bond length of spacetime connection.Originally Posted by GUILLE
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Oh, yes, I remember those numbers. Can you remember in what page you gave me the images for those?
Last edited by michellemfry; 01-14-2006 at 11:49 PM.
I have another question, are the images that you gave about photons in this thread also valuable for gravitons?
Last edited by michellemfry; 01-14-2006 at 11:49 PM.
pages 9 and 10.Originally Posted by GUILLE
Only if the speed of the graviton is the same as the speed of the photon.Originally Posted by GUILLE
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)