It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Fundamental Phenomena > General Phenomena > Emergence
Reload this Page who were the Newtonians?
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
who were the Newtonians?
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,232
Thanks Given: 692
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
who were the Newtonians? - 01-30-2006, 01:31 PM

They are the ones who in spite of mounting evidence believed till the end that Newton’s laws with instantaneous action-at-a-distance is the only game in town. Most of them were influential people who held authoritative positions in academia, responsible for indoctrinating future generation with their growing outdated knowledge of physics based on a clockwork universe, deterministic and reversible.

They opposed Faraday’s lines of force and the idea of field completely permeating space and time.

The most notorious which include natural philosophers and mathematicians were Gauss, Riemann, Weber from Germany; Lagrange, Laplace, Ampere, Poisson from France. Some of them didn’t have any choice in term of a selection of opposing theories. Or they were too old to want to make any difference belonging to an earlier generation of physical researchers. They would certainly changed their affiliations into Maxwellians if they were reading by electric lamps not gas or by the flickering candle flame of vacillating shadow and light, dim and bright.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
01-30-2006, 02:59 PM

Although they didn't have an alternative theory, just if, say, Poisson, Laplace and Lagrange agreed to develop an alternative physics, with the help of alternate ideas to Newton's, then i would have chaned history. Einstein's SR wouldn't be a solution to the newton-maxwell probelm, it would be a solution to this new theory vs maxwell problem. This theory could have had, for example, Leibniz's Vis Viva, Descartes's plane instead of Gaussian and Riemannian geometries, and Lagrange's wave propagation idea of maxima-minima.

In general, what I mean is that newtonians not only were so because of the spacetime points they lived in, but also that they weren't conditioned to be so, and the fact that they assumed Newton's work might have been a not so good decision when one look sat how many good physics ideas were left out as they opposed the theories of this great.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
technology
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,232
Thanks Given: 692
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
technology - 01-31-2006, 01:14 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
what I mean is that newtonians not only were so because of the spacetime points they lived in
The available technologies for each era affect the full acceptance of any paradigm shift. Without the technology of interferometer Michelson-Morley could not have performed the null experiment for special relativity.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com