You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
who are (were) the Einsteinians? -
01-30-2006, 01:33 PM
Einsteinians are (were) the closet absolutists disguised publicly as relativists of both special and general theory. The notable ones not in any order or nationality but whatever first comes to mind are: Sir Arthur Eddington, Friedmann, Lemaitre, Hubble, Scharzchild, Gamow, Hoyle, TinyTree, Lanczos, Synge, and whoever wrote textbooks about relativity theories in order to discuss what in their mind believed in was really all about the unchanging things.
The ultimate symbols of absoluteness are the black holes and the mother of all black holes is the one and only one big bang singularity.
What about the living Einsteinians? Not in the habit of naming names, they should know who they are. They kept asking themselves why the universe should possess a beginning in time or in space. Some asked why the universe should continue existing in an absolute state without a beginning or end. They started with many courses of action then reached 3 then 2 then finally 1. They tried to measure infinity armed only with a single zero-point and when they wanted more and reached into their pockets full of mathematical tricks they came up empty-handed, emptier than what they always thought space and time were empty. They failed to realize that it was really their empty mind working overtime trapped in an infinite loop to which not even the most powerful supercomputer can get out of. Yet they kept feeding these superbly stubborn machines with more power crunching out one more decimal place for the number p or printing the next prime adding to the list of millions they got if not just to keep cryptographers busy but refusing to accept in their hearts that if they just put the gear in reverse they arrived back at the one and only prime whose birthright they denied since they learned how to add 1+1=2. They real problem is that they ought to explain to the general public who toiled long and hard keeping these monolithic machines running smoothly that why is 1-1=0?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
The Einsteinians were more Einstenians about cosmological issues than gravitational ones. In fact, the whole meaning of GR has not been philosophically developed at all. In this, we must make a distinction between Hubble and others as the Cosmological Einstenians, and the philosophers to come which should be Gravitational Einsenians.
those who tried to see and were blinded? -
01-30-2006, 06:37 PM
Have we not all tried to make sense of our existance,and have notsome pushed the envelope further than most!And then be ridiculed by their peers,for their
preposterous claims,we live in a dual existance,one of realitive-realness and the
other of absolute realness,both are valid,to a point,but the latter lasts longest?
The singularity is only a Point!A point of enterance,from the unrealised to the
realised,a dimensional doorway.
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
"There is nothing permanent except change" 
those who tried to see and were blinded? -
01-30-2006, 06:37 PM
Linear Mode
