Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    The Thinker Guille is a glorious beacon of light Guille is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    62

    What do we Know?

    To start the forum going, this is the best question to ask, before what is knowledge itself, we should define what do we know, or if we know at all.

    So, what do we know? In contrast to what we believe, think, feel...

    What impplies this difference?

  2. #2
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    from experience

    When a human is conceived in the womb, it starts developing the sense of hearing and sense of touch. By these two senses, the fetus begins its knowledge acquisition. After birth, the sense of smell and the sense of sight and the sense of taste are added to these knowledge base.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  3. #3
    The Thinker Guille is a glorious beacon of light Guille is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    When a human is conceived in the womb, it starts developing the sense of hearing and sense of touch. By these two senses, the fetus begins its knowledge acquisition. After birth, the sense of smell and the sense of sight and the sense of taste are added to these knowledge base.
    But are the objects of that perception, knowledge? They might be, but onyl for the particular human. For the rest, the things are different.

  4. #4
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    perception results neural connection

    the result of sense perception is a neural connection. If the fetus keep hearing its parents quarreling, after birth dysfunctional characteristics will set-in.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  5. #5
    The Thinker Guille is a glorious beacon of light Guille is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    the result of sense perception is a neural connection. If the fetus keep hearing its parents quarreling, after birth dysfunctional characteristics will set-in.
    What is "will set-in"? I've heard that it is true that if one when he is a fetus he hears things that are nto welcoming in a sens,e there is a high probability that he neglects connecting to reality, and becomes an autist.

  6. #6
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    connected

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    What is "will set-in"?
    Once the neurons are connected, it is impossible to disconnect them except by killing the individual. But death is not an acceptable solution in this case. Biologically speaking, there must be a way to disconnect neurons???
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  7. #7
    The Thinker Guille is a glorious beacon of light Guille is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    Once the neurons are connected, it is impossible to disconnect them except by killing the individual. But death is not an acceptable solution in this case. Biologically speaking, there must be a way to disconnect neurons???
    My little knowledge of biology tells me that it could be by provoking tumors in the neurons: they will disconnect to it, and then we have to reduce and eliminate the tumor, of course. There are several problems with this method: the person will have tumor (i.e. cancer), the neurons might not disconnect, so it will spand all around, we might not stop the tumor in time, we still don't know how to eliminate completely tumors, provoke them, controll them, or even predict them. We don't even know exactly why they happen (we know how: overmultiplication).

  8. #8
    Master michellemfry will become famous soon enough
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    620
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    29

    Wink

    We know we, the sense of community, as opposed to isolation, which has proven effects.
    Michelle

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    greater of two evils

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    My little knowledge of biology tells me that it could be by provoking tumors
    Is this the lesser of two evils, the other being death. I need to research some more.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    Master michellemfry will become famous soon enough
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    620
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    29
    The causes of miscarraige could be the lesser of two evils in this case. Not a very pleasant subject, is it? The fetus knows death.
    Michelle


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to top