I believe I have no ethics. I mean, by this, that I don't have a dogmatic or series of principles by which I decide upon my actions and behaviour. I just act. I don't wonder if they are good or bad, sometimes I do wonder if they are worthy, or not, if they are positive, or not, if they are intelligent, or not.... But never if they are good or bad in the sense of ethics. But the fact that I act impplies that there are acts that I do to and that I don't. Thus, one coudl say that the acts I don't do are those which I don't consider ethical and the acts I do to are those which I consider ethical. And how could I object? Morever, how can wre say if an act is ethical or not? The society has changed, and that determines the ethics of each time. Greeks were all bisexual, whiles now that would be considered depravating. 60 years ago smoking pot was very rare and said to be of communists. Now it is a normal thing in everybody: 9/10 of people of my age in Spain, smoke pot.
I mean, by all this,
WHAT IS ETHICS?
DOES ETHICS EXIST?
DOES IT EXIST INDEPENDENTLY OF OUR MIND AND BEHAVIOUR?
IS AN ACT ETHICAL OR NOT IN IT'S BEING, OR IS IT A RELATIVE NOT-AUTOMATIC PROPERTY?
Everyone please post what you think, for this is highly relevant to the TOE.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
