ToeQuest

Alternative Views �Honoring Dr. Wolfgang Pauli�

humanbydefault — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:55:38 GMT

�Honoring Dr. Wolfgang Pauli�

�Synchronicity� �What is it and why is so important?
The answer to those questions is the royal ways to find �the Theory of Certainty�, the ultimate communion between �Logic� and �Common Sense.�
I�ll begin presenting my arguments to you based on what you already know, studied and accepted as facts.
What do you see at the screen as the final result of the famous �Double Slits Experiments�? The answer has no room for equivocations of any sort: A �spectrum� composed by alternating fringes of bright and dark areas �formed� by the cumulative arrival of �quanta� (and particles) into the screen.
Fine! I tell you that the spectrum that you see matches the exact graphical representation of the so-called �Law of Probabilities.�
�-I got cha, didn�t I�?� (That is what many skeptical could scream at the top of their lungs in celebration) If the �spectrum� is a fact then the Law is also an undeniable fact� Does it sound right?
Yes! �and No! It doesn�t sound right!
It�s not a paradox�Don�t be afraid! It is the simplest analysis ever and I�ll prove it to you! I promise!
My Theory explains Reality as a �deterministic process� occurring at such incredibly high speed that from our perspectives could be seen as �instantaneous in nature.� It isn�t but we have no physical (read possible) ways to prove otherwise.
The intriguing �spectrum� so many times discussed and endlessly argued in Physics Class is the �Image� left for us to accept, observe and �live with� unless we open our minds into a completely new and promising Theory often referred as �The Theory of Everything.�
Dr. Wolfgang Pauli knew that �Synchronicity� was right on the path of finding such Theory but he missed one particular detail: It had to be proven with numbers and not words.
So far I have explained to you what the �spectrum� represents at the screen, are we all clear? Cycles of Reality interacting (i.e. cancelling each other out) due to the effects of an inherent �perturbation� in a time progressive equation.
Goethe theory of colours, Newton�s circle of seven musical notes and a vast list of empirical numerical calculations shown to you in my blogs, postings and books are an undeniable evidence of such process.
I have talk about the �spectrum� of a key experiment considered by Dr. Richard Feynman himself as the final answer to uncover the nature of Reality, I have made the parallel (realistic) between the �Law of Probabilities� and the same results obtained from that experiment too but there is still something that I haven�t mentioned� �Synchronicity�� What is it and how important such Theory will be.
In simple English and employing a time-honored razor (Ockham�s razor) this is Ladies and Gentlemen what �Synchronicity� is:
It is The Theory of Certainty itself! It is knowing the precise moment when an electron (quanta or particle) will hit the screen right in the center of the bright fringe!
It is the only way to �bypass� the inconveniences of not having the Physical aptitude that would enable us to �observe� Reality at its own speed!
It is �predicting� the Cash 3 number that will be drawn days from today because it ultimately is the only Theory based on REFERENCE.
In my book �Lex Parsimoniae� I proposed using 3 identical sets to observe the �Double slits Experiment�. A computer linked to all three screen processing a simultaneous shot of electrons into the screen. I�m convinced that at one point we will be able to establish with 100% certainty the next shot going right into the center of the next computer screen. I have done it before with a seemingly lucky game and it is my firm believe that Dr. Wolfgang Pauli and Dr. Carl Gustav Jung were right on the �guts of it�!
My name is Miguel De Zayas and I am the author of this article.

"second experiment to prove my theory"

humanbydefault — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:17:48 GMT

�SECOND TRIAL�

I can understand why those skeptical members out there may feel frustrated after the success of such incredible prediction ... I can see that and I understand that their limitation based on the premises of a stubborn logical universe with no room for common sense at all�

I said to myself � -Let�s try to search for another �power series� in progress no matter how long in time so they could have a second chance to reconsider the fact that there is a Reality around us and it is always �watching� whether you believe it or not.

No more words and let�s see the facts:

The following Hamiltonian in progress is made by a pair of 7s� I know that you�re going to like it.

This will be our database:

05/23/10 775
06/17/10 775
06/26/10 747
06/26/10 772
07/23/10 797

This will be an interesting one I can tell you this from what I see:

Pay attention to the two pairs 775 and the last one 797!

I�ll represent the drawings between each of the (3) �links� important in this analysis and let the other two for the end.

775 > 50 drawings < 775 > 72 drawings < 797 >� prediction!
775 = 19 and 2 x 19 = 38!
797 = 23
38 � 23 = 15! Our next result will be 771 or 717 or 177!

Is it clear now!

When? Easy! 72 � 50 = 22! In 22 drawings one of those three combinations will be the winner number for Cash 3.

One last word about the intermediate results 772 and 747. If you �mirror� 2 + 4 = 6 and 6 is the image of 1 as you now know from my system so to compensate for 6 the result must include two 7s and one 1.

Another very important consideration in this analysis:

797 (the last �link� drawn from the �power series�) has a 9 in it. 9 as you know is also the image of 4 so we definitely need a 1 to obtain a total of 5 compensating the equation 775 775 775 in drawing 144!

So interesting progression this one. 7 + 2 = 9 and 144 = (1 + 4 + 4) = 9!

The �balancing links� 772 and 747 were drawn 18 drawings from 775�take a look: from 06/17 to 06/26 there are indeed 18 drawings and 1 + 8 = 9!

But if all that wasn�t enough the last �link� 797 was drawn on 07/23/10 that from the �intermediate links� on 06/26/10 result in 54 drawings and 5 + 4 = 9 too!

Isn�t Reality perfect and beautiful?

The predicted result will be due on 08/03/10!

The experiment has been officially reopened. No room for editing from today� The entry will be recorded officially as for now!

GOD BLESS YOU ALL!

Alternative Views "western logic versus eastern common sense"

humanbydefault — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:15:50 GMT

�Is Plato and his teaching truly welcomed by modern Western Societies?�

I will let you to answer this question to yourselves. I will provide a couple of points and you will first meditate and then draw the corresponding conclusions.

This is a quote from Wikipedia:

Sophism can mean two very different things: In the modern definition (from Plato), a sophism is a specious argument used for deceiving someone. In Ancient Greece, the sophists were a category of teachers who specialized in using the tools of philosophy and rhetoric for the purpose of teaching ar�te � excellence, or virtue � predominately to young statesmen and nobility. The practice of charging money for education, and providing wisdom only to those who can pay, led to the condemnations made by Plato in regard to their profession itself being 'specious' or 'deceptive', hence the modern usage of the term. (End of quote)

�The practice of charging for education�� Now! We all know that the Pharmaceutical monopolies pay for the education of future doctors in medicine too; I have heard some interesting critics and statements linking the prescription of dangerous and not-completely-proven drugs to a conditional status whether a medical doctor could or not continue offering his services as a professional�

Facts or myth? You decide it!

On the other side there is the �ethical question� whether those Physicists newly �formed� and �educated� under orthodox educational programs are entirely free to pursue (let�s say�) a contradicting approach to Reality?

Who would mind me saying that Westerners (I�m one of them) are prone to use LOGIC to explain everything we see, hear and touch?

Logic is not a bad thing do not misinterpret my thoughts� It is that we (westerners) usually forget to use it moderately or what�s the same to say along with a dosage of Common Sense. The dilemma is that Common Sense is almost like Sixth Sense� A little bit �arbitrary�, �abstract� and �subjectively personal�.

That�s true! It is! But that is when LOGIC comes to the rescue. They are interconnected in a sacred way we sometimes forget. Plato was clear about using both in a more measured way� Perhaps that is the reason Einstein agreed with him in a few issues concerning the nature of Reality among others.

Since modern �Physicists� backed by modern �Mathematicians� are lately too busy trying to figure out Reality with LOGIC alone, It is my guess that Plato has become a literal �Pain in the butt� for many modern �Philosophers��

Since TOEQUEST is filled with those I expect that this article will light up some of them too.

But before planning a response� Two things though:

One� Whatever is not yours, please don�t forget to quote it before so we know the source.

Two� Try to leave out of this thread � how was it put on top? - Oh yes! �specious argument used for deceiving someone�� try to keep both feet on the ground and speak English, please?

HBD

zero power zero

AntonioLao — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:02:05 GMT

Zero power of zero is not defined in mathematics. That is 0⁰ is undefined. This can be demonstrated by using a graphing calculator like TI-84. It indicated a domain error. However, the zero power of a variable, any complex or real numbers (except zero) or even a matrix is all defined. All the answers come out as unity, for matrices, the identity matrix: ��⁰=1, ��⁰=1, A⁰=I, where I is the identity matrix. These can all be tested using TI-84. Surprisingly, if O is the zero matrix, that is to say all its elements are zero, O⁰=I. This was tested using TI-84. Without the luxury of a PhD degree in mathematics, this remains a mathematical mystery. Why is zero power zero undefined while the zero power of the zero matrix equals the identity matrix?

zero power matrix

AntonioLao — Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:51:25 GMT

Certain definitions in mathematics give peculiarities that defy complete understanding before one attempts of becoming a PhD of mathematics. One example is the zero power of a matrix. Given a matrix A and its inverse A��, their product is the identity matrix: A A�� =A��A = I. In the real number system, this is the same as dividing a number by itself to give unity, for example, 2 � 2 = 1 or �� = 1. In these cases, the meaning of the identity matrix is equivalent to the unity of real numbers wherein it can be understood that the inverse of a matrix is the same as the reciprocal of the matrix: A�� = 1/A or A � A = I. In the imaginary complex domain, the same definitions can apply. However, the inverse of imaginary unity is the negative of imaginary unity: (��)(-��) = �� = 1 while the inverse of an arbitrary complex number (��+��) is (��-��)/(��+��) such that their product is unity. Although all real and complex imaginary numbers have inverses, not all matrices have inverses. In particular, the square symmetric Hadamard matrices have no inverses. Nevertheless, the zero power of any square symmetric Hadamard matrix is equal to the identity matrix of the same order: A⁰ = I, where A has no inverse.

constant of constant

AntonioLao — Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:31:31 GMT

In the mathematical science of the integral calculus, constant of constant seems to appear as the constants of integration of multiple integrations. For example, the indefinite double integral ∬��=∫[∫��]��=∫[��+��₁]��=�∫��+��₁∫��+��₂=⅙��+��₁��+��₂ here both ��₁ and ��₂ are constants of integration. However, since ��₁ is the integration constant of inner integration, it is properly called the constant of constant. Similarly, in triple indefinite integration, the constant of constant of constant can be observed as the following: ∭��=∬[∫��]��=∬[��+��₁]��=∫[⅙��+��₁��+��₂]��=�⅙��⁴+��₁��+��₂��+��₃, here again ��₁, ��₂, and ��₃ are the constants of integration and ��₁ is the constant of constant of constant.

hole in the proof

AntonioLao — Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:11:55 GMT

A hole in the sky is a weather phenomenon that becomes a climatic anomaly. A hole in an apple indicates a worm inside. A hole in the head requires either a doctor or a psychiatrist. However, a hole in the proof allows anyone to see thru it and finds its logical flaws. Before any conjecture can become a theorem, it must provide less and less holes in its proof. This is easier Said than done. Removing holes becomes the do or die preoccupation of mathematicians since the dawn of time where and when cavemen and cavewomen allow sunlight to penetrate their caves and were perplexed about the reality of the shadows on the cave walls and wondered where the shadows go when the sun disappeared over the horizon until they discovered that fire can provide shadows without the sun allow them to close the cave during cold season, removing the hole to begin a life in productive isolation heralding the coming of modern society that remove holes at lower and lower nested structures of the atoms. But the final holes to be removed are the holes of breaking the gluon barrier of the nuclei and get a gleam of the naked singularity of the big bang.

Science-Based Discussion "2147483647... Did you know the Messianic meaning of this number?"

humanbydefault — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:17:30 GMT

I think you better click here guys... Don't let anyone confuse you:

In 1814, Peter Barlow, not anticipating future interest in prime numbers, wrote (in A New Mathematical and Philosophical Dictionary):

Euler ascertained that 231 − 1 = 2147483647 is a prime number; and this is the greatest at present known to be such, and consequently the last of the above perfect numbers [i.e., 230(231 − 1)], which depends upon this, is the greatest perfect number known at present, and probably the greatest that ever will be discovered; for as they are merely curious, without being useful, it is not likely that any person will attempt to find one beyond it.” (End of quote)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2147483647

It is such important number that it deserves an entire blog just for it!

2147483647 is another evidence that my system of interpreting numbers under a Physical lens actually...WORKS!

Let's separate it according to "Mirror Analysis making sense"...

(214) (7) [48] (34) (6) (7) Done!

Now let's add up the numbers after properly being converted an EVEN number of times:

[7] [7] [7] [7] [6] [7]

Cancelling out the [7]s that repeat... [6] [7] = 13!

Bad luck... Eh? I love this number!

bottle with no inside or outside

AntonioLao — Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:01:21 GMT

If the universe is a bottle then it is a bottle with no inside or outside. In the advanced geometry of topology, it is called a Klein bottle. This unique bottle can be described by hyperbolic non-Euclidean geometry of two negative curvatures and one minimum distance between curvatures. On the one hand, a sphere which has no edges but has two sides, the inside and the outside. Although it is not practically possible to construct a Klein bottle using a square sheet of flexible material in 3D, the result is nonetheless valid in mathematics.

Consider, in the plane, the square of all points with Cartesian coordinates (x,y) such that -1 ≤ x ≤ 1 and -1 ≤ y ≤ 1. The mathematical operation of identifying the point (x,1) with the point (x,-1), for all x, can be thought of as forming a cylinder in 3D with 2 sides, the outside and the inside, and 2 edges. The operation of identifying the point (1,y) and (-1,-y) is like forming a cylinder with a twist resulting into a M�bius topology. The Klein bottle is constructed by doing these 2 operations simultaneously.

elementary freedom

AntonioLao — Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:06:58 GMT

At the very least there are 35 fundamental elementary particles. These are the ones that are observed or circumstantially observed by high energy experiments. The six quarks flavors and their three color constituents total number 18. The six leptons (electron, muon, tau, and their neutrinos) total number 6. The bosons: photon, 8 gluons, W, and Z total number 11. If their anti-particle partners are included then there are a total of 70 elementary particles; if the unobserved ones: graviton, Higgs boson, and magnetic monopole are included with their anti-partners then the total number of elementary particles increases to 76. 76 particles made up 76 realities. However, the question is which of these are truly free? This implies freedom of association, multiplication, division, and dispersion.

The best candidate, of course, is the photon. It has zero rest mass hence gravitationally free. Since it is a boson, two differently spacetime located photons can have exactly the same quantum numbers and independent of Pauli Exclusion Principle. Nevertheless, the best indication of absolute freedom for the photon is its maximum speed. It can always travel at the fastest speed of the universe. Lastly, a photon not interacting with any other elementary particles can said to live forever.

Science-Based Discussion Why Are We Here?

Meem — Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:17:10 GMT

Quote:

By EMMA VANDORE, AP Business Writer Emma Vandore, Ap Business Writer � 1 hr 34 mins ago
PARIS � Scientists behind the European particle collider aimed at uncovering the secrets of the universe don't want to stop there � they want to build an even bigger machine with partners and funds from around the world.
Instead of whirling atoms in giant rings, as CERN, a [COLOR=#366388 !important][COLOR=#366388 !important]particle [COLOR=#366388 !important]physics [/COLOR][COLOR=#366388 !important]laboratory[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR] outside Geneva, and the smaller Tevatron at Fermilab near Chicago do, scientists want a new-generation machine that will shoot them straight.
Plans for the next step, a euro10 billion ($12.85 billion), 50-kilometer (31-mile) tunnel called the International Linear Collider, were presented to French President Nicolas Sarkozy at a conference in Paris on Monday.
"If we are going to build an ambitious machine, then it's got to be a global machine," Barry Barish, director of the proposed collider, told The Associated Press on Monday.
Depending on who wants to host it � and how much they are willing to pay � the International Linear Collider could potentially be built anywhere in the world.
Barish, a professor at the California Institute of Technology, presented proposals to host the successor to [COLOR=#366388 !important][COLOR=#366388 !important]CERN's[/COLOR][/COLOR] Large Hadron Collider in Japan, Russia, the U.S. and at CERN.
He said scientists from China, India, Canada and elsewhere also will be associated with the project,
which hopes to solve
"one of the puzzles of
why we are here."

It's sort of funny, to me, that pretty much right after the LHC has been turned on, there are plans to build a new collider already. But is all this a waste? Is this something science doesn't do, shouldn't do ... "trying to solve ... one of the puzzles of why are we here?"

Quote:

"Your work represents the oldest dream of man since he tried to understand and transform what goes on around him," Sarkozy said. "Why is there something rather than nothing?"

analog fading

AntonioLao — Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:59:33 GMT

Analog inputs and outputs are becoming a thing of the past. One major push is the decision made by the FCC to go digital TV. Theory of telecommunication has for a long time known many disadvantages of analog signals. The first major disadvantage is signal power dispersion or the loss of signal strength and intensity which necessitated strong broadcasting power signal output at the source thus increasing the heights of the transmission towers as well as the costs of building such towers. On the receiving end of the signals, probability of reception is directly proportional to the length of the receiving antennae. The longer the antenna the weaker the signal it can receive. Since signals deteriorate as distance between transmitter and receiver increases, the farthest ends require the longest antennae. Therefore, to send a signal to the edge of the visible universe would require a transmission antenna that is almost infinitely tall and at the receiving end of this signal likewise a receiving antenna that is also infinitely tall. Both antennae are physically impossible to construct. Unfortunately, it is by the same technology that scientists hope to detect the echoes of gravity waves. Current best technology is known as the phase interferometric arrays with a baseline distance of 196 millions miles or approximately 315 millions kilometers equivalent to the distance between opposite ends of earth�s orbit around the sun.

Science-Based Discussion "...nobody!"

humanbydefault — Sun, 25 Jul 2010 00:27:34 GMT

�The questions no mathematician could answer today and every single kid will be able to ten years from now��

Which one is the only number that achieves perfect symmetry with the completion of one complete cycle of ten?

What are E.R.Ps. and do they transmit the same message as calculation progress?

What is the empirical connection between the inherent perturbation of our Reality and the Plank�s constant?

I�ll answer those questions in just a moment I just had a thought I�d like to share with all of you:

It is conceivable that our existence could be shared with others like ours borrowing the same space but separated by cycles within a �Quantum of Reality� at least that�s the way I figure it out. Sometimes I wonder if those questions have been already answered long time ago in any of the many possible parallel existences besides ours�

First question first!

The answer is 7! (Seven!) Let�s see the demonstration:

The following is a list of results obtained from multiplying each fundamental number (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) by their own ten times! (One cycle elapses after 10, still remember the �Maya�s number theory I brought into our forum not long ago?).

1 x 1 (ten times) = 1!
2 x 2 (ten times) = 2048 *No symmetry*
3 x 3 (ten times) = 177 147 *No symmetry*
4 x 4 (ten times) = 419 4 304 *No symmetry*
5 x 5 (ten times) = 488 28 125 *No symmetry*
6 x 6 (ten times) = 362 797 056 *No symmetry*

Take a look at this one!

7 x 7 (ten times) = 197 73 267 43!

Allow me to rearrange it for you:

197 (73) 264 (73) � I will cut away for a moment 73 in both sides to simplify the operation�

197 264 >>>> what you see is obvious by now. 7 is the �image� of 2, 9 is the �image� of 4 and finally 6 is the �image� of 1.

142 214 but having to convert them an odd number of times the result changes signs into negative (-)

7 >< 7 (half-cycle ahead in time). = -14! Where 1/14= 0.0 714 285 (71)�
As you can see the �lucky trios� are once again present, but let�s continue with the rest of the numbers left:

8 x 8 (ten times) 383 458 040 *No symmetry*
9 x 9 (ten times) 313 810 596 *No symmetry*
0 x 0 (ten times) = 0 *No symmetry*

First question has been answered and proved with numbers.
Second question:

What are the E.R.P.s? They are the smallest numerical representation carrying a repetitive message. They are a common numerical phenomenon in every single irrational number (Alpha, Golden Ratio, Fermat numbers, Fibonacci constant, Pi and the Square Root of 2 to mention just some).

The second part of the same question will be demonstrated numerically next:

I will take number 2 (arbitrarily) as an example. I will multiply 2 by itself ten times, twenty times and finally thirty times where I will finally achieve perfect symmetry. Then I will divide both �wings� and multiply each of them (separately) ten more times and check if symmetry is still holding or not.

2 x 2 (ten times) 20 48
2 x 2 (twenty times) 209 7 152
2 x 2 (thirty times) 214748 >< 3648!!!

Let�s rearrange those numbers so you can see the symmetry:

(21) (47) 48 >< 3648
(2 + 1) (4 + 2) 48 >< 3648
3648 >< 3648! See it now?

So! I will respect the original numerical configuration of both �wings� and continue performing a (by 2) multiplication on both separately:

214748 x 2 (ten more times) = 219901952!

3648 x 2 (ten more times) = 219901952!

Incredible! This means that along the calculation there is a point where two separately �forming� E.R.P.s joined in a synchronized manner to continue carrying the same �information� across time.
A similar parallel was presented for the first time in history of science to you when I made the same demonstration in posted blogs earlier on.

(will continue)

digital rising

AntonioLao — Sat, 24 Jul 2010 21:00:00 GMT

Is God or the Designer of the cosmos a natural mathematician? A direct answer to this question is not possible. However, observing the workings of the visible universe, one can indirectly come to a conclusion that the constructive mechanism of the cosmos indeed is describable by the laws of mathematics. These laws do not have to obey the decimal system of numbers. But they certainly always obey the system of binary numbers. All is well and good since the decimal base 10 system of numbers can be transformed into the binary system of numbers, vice versa, although it is still easier to count using the 10 fingers of one�s two hands. However, the advantage disappears if reality contains more than 10 objects since in the widely use Hindu Arabic symbols of numbers there are only 9 symbols: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Uniqueness of the symbol zero (0) as a place value becomes true advantage of the decimal system. For the decimal number 1000 there are 3 place values of zero and each can take on any value from 1 to 9 making a total of one thousand distinct number symbols from 1000, 1001, 1002, �,1999. If 1 is added to 1999 then the next higher number symbol is 2000 so on and so forth.

Although the number zero is useful as a place value in decimal system it is useless for the binary system. However, zero becomes useful in the binary system as a multiplicative factor. This idea becomes clear since binary system uses exponential counting for the base number 2 such that 2⁰=1, 2�=2, 2�=4, 2�=8, 2⁴=16, 2⁵=32, 2⁶=64, 2⁷=128, 2⁸=256, 2⁹=512, 2�⁰=1024, so on and so forth. Therefore, any real whole number from 1 to infinity can be symbolized using a multiplicative factor ��ₑ where the subscript �� denotes the exponent of 2 and ��ₑ only take on two values 1 and 0 such that any number, say between 1 and 16, can be represented by ��₄��₃��₂��₁��₀. 1=00001, 2=00010, 3=00011, 4=00100, 5=00101, 6=00110, 7=00111, 8=01000, 9=01001, 10=01010, 11=01011, 12=01100, 13=01101, 14=01110, 15=01111, and 16=10000. The increasing value of the exponent of 2 becomes the universal digital rising as foreseen by the great Designer of the cosmos and infinity is represented by endless sequence of 11111111111111111111111111111111111...

Unified Discussion Hello everybody.

melanie — Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:28:23 GMT

Hi, Hello, it's me again.

This is the true face of reality, and i'm not sacred to reveal it.