[Guille]

Originally Posted by dleviwing

Hi Mike;
The concept of monopole comes into effect due to the fact that Dirac did not impose a limit function into his equations that represented the limits of nature and reality. Of course he was not aware of these limits any more than modern science is today.

To create a minimal magnetic effect, it requires two rotating subatomic particles with their axes oriented in opposite directions; thus it requires two magnetic moments to produce the effect of a magnetic field phenomena. This should not be confused with the electromagnetic wave phenomena that Dirac was concerned with.

But mayeb the idea of magnetic monopoles is more reasonable if we don't make it a particle, but a quanta. Just like the photon is, and like the graviton should be looked as. And also the gluons, and any quanta of force, any boson, shouldn't be called particle but quanta. This would solve all the contradictory ideas.

[dleviwing]

Guille;
I have no objections if you wish to trade one illusion for another.
I just thought knowing would be a better solution to the problem.
BTW, The magnetic effect is only associated with a particle's interactions. So your idea just might work.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by dleviwing

Guille;
I have no objections if you wish to trade one illusion for another.
I just thought knowing would be a better solution to the problem.
BTW, The magnetic effect is only associated with a particle's interactions. So your idea just might work.

Quanta is good to get measurements. I know that it's not how light or gravity or magnetism is devided, not at all, it's all just measurements. I agree with you, it's the contemporary physicists that think the photons and gravitons really "exist".