ToeQuest

We're going on a TOE Quest!


Register

Reply

Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,934
Blog Entries: 6
85 AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
12-27-2005, 02:25 PM
graviton vs. photon

Graviton is the quantum field vector gauge boson of the gravitational field. Unlike photons, which cannot interact with one another, the gravitons are able to interact with each other, theoretically. The failure to detect a single graviton should never be construed as a hindrance for theorizing graviton interaction. The spin of the photon is unity, while that of graviton is two. By infinitesimal congruence, the graviton is the inscribed and the photon is the circumscribed Feynman loop of spacetime. This suggests that for every set of 8 spacetime points of a photon there corresponding 4 gravitons and 4 antigravitons. Each graviton is a coupling of two Feynman loops of the same gauge but of opposite spin. Nevertheless, each loop is describable by a singular Hadamard matrix. This matrix representation reduces the infinite degrees of freedom to only six making the graviton field renormalizable. Furthermore, the existence of photons is a testament for stable interactions between gravitons and antigravitons. Along same reasoning, a spin zero scalar massive Higgs boson is the product of multiple Hadamard matrices.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
12-28-2005, 07:05 AM
Hypothetically, gravitons have no charge, so they are their own antiparticles. I believe that is the thing: when gravitons are interacting, photons can't exist, for they are the uninteraction of gravitons. So when photons crash with a mass, if thia mass is a loosing electrons matter (metal), the electron will be produced, or better said accelerated by the enrgy taken from the photon by the atom. Whiles if the matter is electrong aining, the energy wil be retaine din the nucleus. What happens is that the photon is repelled with colour. I believe that because in the non-metals there are always more neutrons than protons or equal, then the number of up quarks is higher than te one of down quarks, that impplies that although the charge is still overall 0, the charge of the force that puts the quarks together is positive. Is this the weak force?

Basically, I mean that the electron is a product of graviton interaction and the photon a product of graviton noninteraction.
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,934
Blog Entries: 6
85 AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
12-28-2005, 12:59 PM
space charge

graviton has no electric charge or color charge but it has space charge of 1/6. +1/6 for graviton and -1/6 for antigraviton.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
12-28-2005, 04:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
graviton has no electric charge or color charge but it has space charge of 1/6. +1/6 for graviton and -1/6 for antigraviton.
Oh, yes, I remember. And what do you hypothesize that are the particles of space?
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,934
Blog Entries: 6
85 AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
12-29-2005, 02:08 PM
spacetime

The particle of spacetime is composed of equal evenness and oddness of H+ and H-.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
12-29-2005, 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The particle of spacetime is composed of equal evenness and oddness of H+ and H-.
And the number of H can vary? If so, what determines a spacetime particle's H charge? I'm revising the papers I recieved from you, I keep them all. Did you find an equation relating the mass to the H charge?
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,934
Blog Entries: 6
85 AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
12-29-2005, 02:30 PM
same number

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
And the number of H can vary? If so, what determines a spacetime particle's H charge? I'm revising the papers I recieved from you, I keep them all. Did you find an equation relating the mass to the H charge?
The H-number of the universe can't vary in a global sense otherwise the universe would have a net electric charge or color charge or space charge. The groupings vary between even and odd. Even for energy and odd for mass. The mass is derived from the products of H's of both pluses and minuses.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
12-29-2005, 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The H-number of the universe can't vary in a global sense otherwise the universe would have a net electric charge or color charge or space charge. The groupings vary between even and odd. Even for energy and odd for mass. The mass is derived from the products of H's of both pluses and minuses.
Do you have a list (or is there a paper that you have sended to me) in which the masses of the particles are derived from the products of H's?
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,934
Blog Entries: 6
85 AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
12-29-2005, 02:52 PM
matrix multiplication

The product of matrix multiplication. However, only Hadamard matrices of the same LOE can be multiplied.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
photon vs photon AntonioLao Quantum Physics 33 08-05-2006 04:40 PM
quantaised nature of photon? ajay prakash Quantum Physics 24 07-22-2006 03:51 PM
why empty orbitals? AntonioLao Quantum Physics 32 07-09-2006 04:25 PM
The story of PHOTON as I see it jessebonin Your TOE Theory 17 02-22-2006 10:18 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 AM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.