It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Fundamental Phenomena > Forces of Nature
Reload this Page graviton vs. photon
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
graviton vs. photon
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,212
Thanks Given: 684
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
graviton vs. photon - 12-27-2005, 01:25 PM

Graviton is the quantum field vector gauge boson of the gravitational field. Unlike photons, which cannot interact with one another, the gravitons are able to interact with each other, theoretically. The failure to detect a single graviton should never be construed as a hindrance for theorizing graviton interaction. The spin of the photon is unity, while that of graviton is two. By infinitesimal congruence, the graviton is the inscribed and the photon is the circumscribed Feynman loop of spacetime. This suggests that for every set of 8 spacetime points of a photon there corresponding 4 gravitons and 4 antigravitons. Each graviton is a coupling of two Feynman loops of the same gauge but of opposite spin. Nevertheless, each loop is describable by a singular Hadamard matrix. This matrix representation reduces the infinite degrees of freedom to only six making the graviton field renormalizable. Furthermore, the existence of photons is a testament for stable interactions between gravitons and antigravitons. Along same reasoning, a spin zero scalar massive Higgs boson is the product of multiple Hadamard matrices.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
12-28-2005, 06:05 AM

Hypothetically, gravitons have no charge, so they are their own antiparticles. I believe that is the thing: when gravitons are interacting, photons can't exist, for they are the uninteraction of gravitons. So when photons crash with a mass, if thia mass is a loosing electrons matter (metal), the electron will be produced, or better said accelerated by the enrgy taken from the photon by the atom. Whiles if the matter is electrong aining, the energy wil be retaine din the nucleus. What happens is that the photon is repelled with colour. I believe that because in the non-metals there are always more neutrons than protons or equal, then the number of up quarks is higher than te one of down quarks, that impplies that although the charge is still overall 0, the charge of the force that puts the quarks together is positive. Is this the weak force?

Basically, I mean that the electron is a product of graviton interaction and the photon a product of graviton noninteraction.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
space charge
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,212
Thanks Given: 684
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
space charge - 12-28-2005, 11:59 AM

graviton has no electric charge or color charge but it has space charge of 1/6. +1/6 for graviton and -1/6 for antigraviton.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
12-28-2005, 03:26 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
graviton has no electric charge or color charge but it has space charge of 1/6. +1/6 for graviton and -1/6 for antigraviton.
Oh, yes, I remember. And what do you hypothesize that are the particles of space?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
spacetime
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,212
Thanks Given: 684
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
spacetime - 12-29-2005, 01:08 PM

The particle of spacetime is composed of equal evenness and oddness of H+ and H-.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
12-29-2005, 01:20 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The particle of spacetime is composed of equal evenness and oddness of H+ and H-.
And the number of H can vary? If so, what determines a spacetime particle's H charge? I'm revising the papers I recieved from you, I keep them all. Did you find an equation relating the mass to the H charge?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
same number
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,212
Thanks Given: 684
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
same number - 12-29-2005, 01:30 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
And the number of H can vary? If so, what determines a spacetime particle's H charge? I'm revising the papers I recieved from you, I keep them all. Did you find an equation relating the mass to the H charge?
The H-number of the universe can't vary in a global sense otherwise the universe would have a net electric charge or color charge or space charge. The groupings vary between even and odd. Even for energy and odd for mass. The mass is derived from the products of H's of both pluses and minuses.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
12-29-2005, 01:39 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The H-number of the universe can't vary in a global sense otherwise the universe would have a net electric charge or color charge or space charge. The groupings vary between even and odd. Even for energy and odd for mass. The mass is derived from the products of H's of both pluses and minuses.
Do you have a list (or is there a paper that you have sended to me) in which the masses of the particles are derived from the products of H's?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
matrix multiplication
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,212
Thanks Given: 684
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
matrix multiplication - 12-29-2005, 01:52 PM

The product of matrix multiplication. However, only Hadamard matrices of the same LOE can be multiplied.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
photon vs photon AntonioLao Quantum Physics 33 08-05-2006 03:40 PM
quantaised nature of photon? ajay prakash Quantum Physics 24 07-22-2006 02:51 PM
why empty orbitals? AntonioLao Quantum Physics 32 07-09-2006 03:25 PM
The story of PHOTON as I see it jessebonin Your TOE Theory 17 02-22-2006 09:18 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com