Gravity's Opposite: Levity

[zeroca]

Mike5,
Thanks for kind remarks!
Excuse me, my reply will be as brief, as possible, since I’m concentrated on the subject of spinning (the thread - dark side of the Moon) and even got headache; I must solve it, but so far it’s unclear for me.
You can read my thread gravity and space. A lot is told there about the space.
“Clearer word than levity”?
If we say that body is concentration of the matter to some center, then the space is rarefaction from the same center “spherically” up to some distance, If we say that body presents itself a contracted solid matter to some center, then we can say that space is spherical expansion from the same center. We can call it “space bubble” with its solid content within it.
I’ll return to this theme once again in a future.
It’s somehow concerned in the thread - dark side of the Moon.
Regards,
Zeroca.

[baudrunner]

Gravity is peculiar. There is no reason to believe that it doesn't behave between two bodies in space the way that two quarks behave, as noted by those Nobel physics laureates studying quark interaction. Apparently its behaviour is something like that of a rubber band, and shows strong attractive interaction until they get close, then just like the rubber band, it relaxes, such that the quarks don't collide, but actually establish an orbital-like relationship with one another. We see that relationship with bodies in space as well, but is it actually the same force? I think that it could very well be.

As regards your offer, thanks, I am interested. I found one program called KoolMoves and it is about the best I've played with so far. Some other packages are heavy on ActiveX controls and therefore slow. They are none of them completely free, however and will display a splash screen with a logo in the background of the SWF file.

(Just about everything I have on my computer not counting the OS is free. I'm a hacker at heart I guess, just can't kick that out of me. Incidentallly, if you haven't yet read Steven Levy's book "Hackers", it is a really engaging read. I'm sure that you'd like it It's been out there for awhile. I rank it right up there with "Inside Intel" by Tim Jackson, "the story of Andy Grove and the Rise of the World's Most Powerful Chip Company," also great reading.)

[Wornways]

What about "impulse" as the opposite of gravity? Wouldn't it have to be something that resists the effects of gravity?

[AntonioLao]

Gravity's opposite is the future since gravity is the past. Or similarly, if gravity is the left then its opposite is the right, or if gravity is the bottom then its opposite is the top.

[roundhousekick]

According to relativity, only relative motion exists. And of course, E = mc^2. Might there be a similar equation, other than Newton's, that describes gravity as the opposite of levity. I fear it has been hiding in plain sight all along. One that allows the solution of which to make gravity attractive or repulsive.

I think you do have exceptional spiritual power to locate something hiding in plain sight. I do feel the same. In term of relative motion, I do not mind much of the attractive/repulsive property. Consider the equation F=ma . We do not know what a force is or its property. Maybe it pointing in the opposite of motion. I do strongly believe this very much has to do with centrifugal force for its property is attractive/repulsive puzzling. We'll hunt it down eventually.