Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing  Lloyd;
If you’re going to present fluidic concepts as fundamental behavior of substance, it would be best to define the properties and functions of matter that produce these fluidic phenomena. Don’t you think? |
David, here's some of the links to the links that defines the properties and functions of fundamental substance, and later quantumized matter that produce these fluidic phenomena, before and after the big-pop. The triad of fundamental substance, fundamental hydrodynamics of, and it's motion are fundamentally linked in its initial/eternal condition. We do know that when hydrodynamics at low temperature moves fundamental or quantumized substance, it moves___it moves___it also must radiate a minimal amount of heat___source of its later hydrogolics[big-pop]. Thus, this is where I say motion comes from, and hydrodynamics
is then, the absolute 5th fundamental force of nature, easily uniting the other four forces, as it's the
only force at eternal/initial conditions of sub-quantum infinity. This other recent post to Dipayankar may help clear some of your confusion up, or make your's and Baud's worse...
The Reason Is;
Because the universe requires a
prime mover, for any of our dynamic theories, gauge theories or ideas to have any
grounded validity. I see only one possiblility of prime mover,
the 5th force of nature, hydrodynamics. I can easily prove with words and experiment why this is true, and that it is the highest probability of the highest possibility, thus the only possibility. If you check out my post about; "A Perspective of Absolute Perception", sections #1 & #9, a thought experiment, you may see why.
http://www.toequest.com/forum/high-l...html#post26152 If not you could search ToeQuest for "hydrodynamics" and "thermodynamics" to find the rest of my posts about it. Also, if you look up all the articles about "hydrodynamic cosmology" in Google, and parse the wrong and dated meanings and theories, while maintaining the basic mechanics, and much of its math, then apply it to the sub-quantum fundamental substance, Dave and I are both talking about, you may start to see what we see. We do know what we see, and our ideas will find total compatibility, when fully worked out.
Regards,
Lloyd
p.s.
I also just finished looking up hydrogolic hydrodynamics, after watching NASA's first moon landing. Their fuel was self-igniting[hydrogolic hydrodynamics]. China invented it centuries ago, first self-igniting rocket fuel. Russia still uses it in their rockets. Just a few pretty good clues to the absolute fundamental substance's initial ignition process. I see the whole universal evolution, as no more than a giant hydrodynamic hydrogolic mechanical engine, as all engines and electric motors are also hydrodynamic. It's the simplest process to see, that I see as the reason no-one but me seems to see it___that's all I know. I was told electricity was hydrodynamic first, when I was four years old. Our small town of 54 people had a PhD come to town and build his own hydro-power plant. That part was water hydrodynamics, but later I asked him exactly what was electricity? He told me the hydrodynamic compression of the energy in the air. He was best friends with my family for years. My father also built the first power generating plant on our farm. I have lived all my life with the early knowledge from these older geniuses, and to them one of the earth's fundamental forces was
hydrodynamics. I didn't realize it again until about a year ago, when I first started posting about it. I only last week realized it was an
absolute fundamental force of nature___that means it is
the 5th force of nature, easily uniting all the other four forces. That's why I so strongly believe it.
I could also give you a simple explanation of magnetite to common sense prove my point. Magnetite or any magnetic metal or rock is a hydrodynamic compressor of em waves. As em waves enter magnetite, the wave radius is compressed into higher spin rates of total velocity mass density, creating magnetism. This easily fits the Shrodenger scalar wave equations, DeBroglie, Dirac, any sensible physicist you want to add. Electric generators just shorten the em waves' radius further, and spin faster, producing electricity proportional to the velocity, and velocity density of the hydrodynamics of all em waves[present and incoming] between the closely rotating magnets. Spin the magnets faster, and you get more electricity, or use larger magnets and set the compression ratio closer. There's nothing more complex, about magnetism and electricty[just the boring quantum mechanics gauge theories of it___some right, some wrong___more wrong ones than right.]. This was all explained, in these simple terms, when I was a child. I grew up in a black-smith shop. We built everything from raw materials___wagons, plows, sleighs, harrows, saws, almost everything with forges, anvils, hammers and powder/heat/hammer welding. I also spent quite a few days at the big power plant, in the center of town, on the river, as the machinery of electricity amazed me, it still does, especially the inside containment and the huge generators and turbines of nuke-plants. I have worked inside containment___you could never see a more beautiful sight in your life than when the reactor head comes off___colors beyond belief. But, be careful, it's hot___zoomies go in all directions, and burn straight through you...
Regards,
Lloyd
Re: The Missing Link Of Understanding -
02-17-2007, 10:52 AM
Re: The Missing Link Of Understanding -
02-18-2007, 06:55 PM
theunify
Linear Mode
