Fitzpatrick's
Vector Scalar
relationship
between
Force, Space and Time
A vector quantity extends in one direction while a scalar quantity extends in all directions.
Berkeley, Mach, Maxwell and many others have told us surroundings are part of the story but present science simply ignores this. So if you want to know how everything really works then surroundings must be included as you search for the whys and wherefores of all the forces. See
Aufbau Laws.
To make any sense out of the force, space, time relationship, the following must be done:
Forcehas to be considered, binding energy, as quantum theory sees it. It also has to be considered both potential and kinetic energy. Potential energy has to be seen as a binding balance between nearby similar entities and the surroundings. Force, as in potential energy, is a steady binding vector resonance relationship such as the attractive force present, between two individual electrons, in sigma and pi chemical bonding and in magnetism. Whereas force, as in kinetic energy, is a binding shift or a simple vector resonance relationship between two individual electrons such as exist in a quantum of light being given and received.
Spacehas to be considered a scalarquantity or sum of all these surrounding individual vector resonance relationships for each phase cycle of the detector.
Time, for a certain entity, has to be considered a
Dr. Milo Wolff scalar wave cycle compared to other scalar wave cycles. The cycle of a scalar wave entity (electron or quark) is the time that this particular spherical, standing wave entity is being completely rebuilt via its surroundings. It is also a phase cycle.
Things that reproduce stay here. Things that don't -- don't. Each electron reproduces itself as a spherical, scalar, standing wave entity via waves emitted by surrounding electrons. This has been mathematically proven by
Dr. Milo Wolff. The quark also reproduces itself in this manner, from energy given off by surrounding quarks but quarks reproduce faster, at the square of the rate that electrons do.
You must remember that your detectors are built from scalar wave entities themselves and therefore are in phase sync with the entities you are detecting.
A scalar wave is far different from a regular wave in that a scalar wave goes in all directions into the surroundings. You can throw a rock into a pond and see the 2 dimensional transverse scalar waves that are being made.
Many centuries ago Christiaan Huygens showed us the scalar aspect of light and exactly how wave fronts worked. We know that all the waves on a wave front are in phase and this is of the utmost importance as we look at a spherical, scalar wave entity.
Less than a century ago quantum scientists showed us this scalar dispersing light was actually made up of individual vector force chunks called quanta.
As in light, these individual vector quantum forces approach a scalar type force the more numerous they are and the higher in frequency and shorter in wavelength that they are in respect to the observer's detection frequency. A scalar, standing wave entity, such as the electron, would be built up like the many skins of an onion in which the waves in any skin would all be in the same phase. Its surface, therefore, would appear, to a single detector, to be flashing on and off just like a movie or cinema frame. And this essentially is the scalar ticking of our time clock.
This is why a 3 D scalar, spherical, standing wave is not detected as a wave. Instead we are having these movie frames which we detect as an entity or as a spin of that entity. Doctor Milo Wolff discovered that the electron and its spin were both scalar, standing waves resonating with same frequency surroundings.
A detector can only detect things that have the same phase cycle and have the same phase angle, as well, as our detectors. For instance we see wave fronts where the waves in that front are all the same frequency phase cycle and in the same scalar phase angle with the waves in our detectors.
Same scalar phase angles are, as I said, more like movie frames flashing on at the same time. They are not similar to the phase angles in matching spots of regular transverse wave forms.
What we sense as c (the velocity of light or 3x108 meters/sec) is really the scalar phase cycle (that we sense as velocity) of the electron's space just as c2 or 9x1016 meters/sec) is the scalar phase cycle (that we sense as velocity and acceleration) of the quark's space.
This angle of these individual phase cycles, as shown by the math of QED, rotates through time, like a clock hand, and corkscrews through space like a helix. QED has proven beyond any doubt that the detection of a scalar, standing wave entity can only take place when a portion of both detector and entity have the same scalar phase cycle and the same scalar phase angle. This is the essence of "squaring the amplitude" in QED. See
Feynman lectures.
Because it takes at least 6 quanta for your eye to see the minimum amount of light, you will not see the importance of the phase angle as seen in QED. They are measuring one quantum. But the individual detectors in your eye are spread a bit in space so they will, of necessity, have different phase angles and will be detecting different phase angles as well. This why we view a spherical, standing wave as a thing and not a wave and this is why we don't see the scalar flashing movie frames. This is also the reason for the distinct phase angle that we detect, when things are reduced to only one quantum, in QED and in
Young's experiment. And this is also one of the reasons why Bob Dicke was wrong in saying that if gravity was caused by relative motion that we would see a similar light and dark pattern as in
Young's experiment.
All of this is going to need some explaining but the above is the whole ball game for understanding space, time and force.
There is no such thing as force in the tensor math of general relativity. There is simply more or less space creation compared to the average space creation. The same force = un-average space approach is used herein.
Both the electron and the quark must be seen as a
Dr. Milo Wolff type spherical, scalar, standing wave entity.
Quantum theory teaches us that this is really a wave, resonance universe. The
Michelson-Morley experimentwarns us not to believe what our ancestors believed about space having a certainty of size.
Space has to be considered valid for only one particular spin/orbit frequency so let's begin with space, time and force as seen by the electron.
This necessitates using
Ampere's Laws. and the unifying aspect of using the concept of motion that Richard Feynman points out in his famous
Quantum Electro Dynamics.
Along with other quantum theorists I would prefer not to consider the electron as a spinning top having motion. As quantum theory has proven, resonances are the underlying cause not motion. But because surroundings must now be involved, the wave aspect becomes far too complicated even for our best present computers. So this compels us toward Feynman's important unifying concept of relative motion.
Our motion and the motion that we consider the microcosm to have are far different. We will not have accuracy with this concept. But we will finally have a model and the approximation that Dirac predicted. While this isn't even close to the final step, it is light years ahead of our present no unification piecemeal science.
If you have clicked all the above red or blue links then you can visualize the approach needed as we look at the electron's spacetime realm even though it is not exactly our spacetime realm.
Let's approach force similar to the way the tensor math of general relativity does it but show space being built of a multitude of force units instead of force being a component of more or less space. Let's do this with the electron now. For unification let's forget all those things restricted to certain realms such as gravity, charge and magnetism. Let's employ motion that has no restrictions. So we'll use Feynman's important motion concept even though QED shows us it's really in phase and out of phase resonances causing these effects.
We can consider every spherical, standing wave entity, no matter the size, to act similarly to the electron, as we dispense with charge and magnetism and simply use motion in the two short paragraphs below.
===============
The individual electron pole to pole attraction in both magnetism and pi bonding occurs whenever an electron, "locked" on an orbital, has its pole rotating on a parallel path, in the same direction, as another "locked" electron. In this instance both electrons spin, in the same direction, on the same spin axis.
The individual electron side to side attraction in magnetism and sigma bonding occurs whenever the closest sides of a spin up and a spin down electron, "locked" on orbitals, are going in the same direction on the same parallel path. In this instance both electrons would be on orbits or orbitals that lie in the same plane.
===============
You have maximum repulsion when the paths are in opposite directions in the two above sentences.
This is exactly what is happening. No magnetism or charge is needed to explain it. In fact this is all that is needed to explain the entire universe including why electrons, stars and galaxies repel each other and why we have gravity. Surprised? It's all explained using
Ampere's Laws.
Nobel scientist Feynman was on the right track. Using something as simple as motion, you can see how this entire universe is operating. See
Fitzpatrick's First Book(FREE)
Space, then for the electron, is the average of the total of these vector repulsive forces that occur every scalar wavelength cycle. (Sort of a reversal of the way the tensor math of general relativity does it.)
But that is for the electron's force, space and time.
For gravitational force, and the mass energy relationship, simply use the spinning quark with the same rules and concept.
The phase cycle frequency (scalar, standing wave frequency) of all quarks is the square of the phase cycle of the electron. Quarks completely rebuild themselves at the square of the speed that electrons rebuild themselves.
Quarks have different (vector force) spin frequencies, all of which are harmonically linked to the electron's spin frequency and this is what determines their different masses.
Please remember both c and c2 are really nothing but scalar phase cycles that we sense as a velocity because, for us, it seems like a velocity once a certain frequency space is built via all the spin frequencies.
We sense c as a velocity (space per unit of time).
We sense c2 (9x1016 meters/sec) as a gravitational acceleration simply because a speed this fast cannot be measured directly in our spacetime realm according to Wheeler and Feynman.
Isn't this why
Van Flandern and Yale university are telling us that gravity acts almost instantly and far faster than the speed of light?
The total number of out of phase spin frequencies give us the space average while certain individual in phase spin frequencies give us attractive forces. Other individual out of phase spin frequencies give us repulsive forces.
This important vector scalar relationship not only exists at the quark and electron spin/orbit frequencies bur seems to exist at all spin/orbit frequencies as well.
This vector scalar relationship is why we see the spacetime interval remaining a constant in one particular spacetime realm (spin orbit frequency system) even though both space and time can change with a change of mass or motion.
Last but not least is the important role played by same scalar frequency surroundings that,
Dr. Milo Wolffhas proven, give us these particular scalar wave entities. It also gives us their spins along with same spin frequency surroundings that give us inertial mass.
That's it in a nutshell.
It's as simple as that really but see also
12/10/2005 Understanding the wave aspect of space and time. Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
& more from Fitz:
Simply click on any of these various colored links to get what you want. No pop up ads with any of these either.
web page importance of SCALAR WAVES Why E = mc2 Speed of Gravity is 9x1016 meters per second. impedance matching Fitzpatrick's First Book(FREE)
a NEW Science Tool Binary Stars 3D + TIME Limits to Logic Fitzpatrick's view http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/ http://www.rbduncan.com/phase.htm you cannot quantify without fixing the gauge
"There is nothing permanent except change" 
Linear Mode
