Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing This type of thinking only generates opinions; not science. Most ToeQuest members simply voice opinions and very often express those opinions as scientific facts. |
'Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.' (A. Einstein)
I think they're both searching for truth, only they do it in their own way; and I think they are doing both great.
The fact of the existence of some kind of a supreme being has not been proven but also has not been falsificated.
I also don't think science can already explain how something can start to exist out of totally nothing.
So I don't understand how you could label science to be absolutely true (not to forget your science).
Do you have the slightest idea what you are talking about?
Although I have to say it could be possible that the (implicit) assumptions lying behind, about the nature of space and time, are wrong.