[dipayankar]

Do you believe what Dr. Kaku says???

Originally Posted by dleviwing

Matter is NOT a property of matter. Mass and energy are measured properties (dimensions) of matter. Stating matter is the same as energy or the same as mass it absolutely WRONG.Only by definition of its defined method of measurement. (2 way in a vacuum) This allows Relativity to work but at the expense of giving the illusion that time is a variance vector related to dimensional space.
Because they are EM radiation waves and not particles.
You are attempting to compare apples and oranges here. This is only true when the rest mass is zero and thus the momentum (p) becomes zero. EM radiation does not have "Rest mass" and thus the equation is correct for EM radiation only. Einstein's equation, however, is valid for the conversion of "Rest mass" to radiant energy.

I should mention that you have distinguished company in the belief that matter and energy are the same thing; Dr.MichioKaku

[dleviwing]

Originally Posted by dipayankar

Do you believe what Dr. Kaku says???

I am pointing out that even the best educated of our species can be wrong when it comes to the most simplest concepts. I believe KooKoo Kaku is wrong about hyperspace also but that does not mean he's ignorant. Unfortunately too many scientific minds have fallen victim to the science hype and brainwashing as they were growing up. Creative imaginations are good in science but creative fantasies being proclaimed as science is not. Dr.Kaku teaches good science fiction that even I enjoy.

[dipayankar]

Even I find it a little tough to believe what he says. He is more of a showman... however I certainly would hope that whatever he says should be true. It would then open up so many wonder ful avenues for research...

Originally Posted by dleviwing

I am pointing out that even the best educated of our species can be wrong when it comes to the most simplest concepts. I believe KooKoo Kaku is wrong about hyperspace also but that does not mean he's ignorant. Unfortunately too many scientific minds have fallen victim to the science hype and brainwashing as they were growing up. Creative imaginations are good in science but creative fantasies being proclaimed as science is not. Dr.Kaku teaches good science fiction that even I enjoy.

[Aiya-Oba]

Matter is content of void. -Aiya-Oba (Poet/Philosopher).

[David Maes]

Originally Posted by dleviwing

Because they are EM radiation waves and not particles.

Ok, but why did Kepler observe in 1628 that the tails of the comets or always pointed away from the sun?

[dleviwing]

Originally Posted by David Maes

Ok, but why did Kepler observe in 1628 that the tails of the comets or always pointed away from the sun?

I think you may be confusing EM waves with solar wind. Not the same thing.

[David Maes]

i'm sorry, but i don't understand...

You know m = mo (1 - v²/c²)^-1/2 ??

When the kinetic energy of a partical increases, then so does its mass.
This has been experimentally confirmed.

You give it more kinetic energy, and it gets more mass.

So why don't just say 'mass-energy'?

i think the energy of an object an the mass of it, are not independent.
i think they are kind of connected to eachother.

When we know the mass and multiply it two times with the speed of light, then we know the energy.
When we know the energy and divide it two times by the speed of light, then we know the mass.

Mass and energy are convertable.
But this conversion always follows E = mc². Of course c² is a huge number; so this means with a very small amount of mass, we can produce an overwhelming amount of energy.

(You just need less then 1 % of a kg uranium converted, to get 'Hiroshima' (with all respect)).

If something moves faster, then it gets more energy. The more energy it gets, the more massive it becomes.

When muons move with 99,9 % of c, their weight is about 22 times as heavy.

[dleviwing]

David Maes;
This link should answer your questions. It also allows you to download the books for free in PDF format. In book 6 (this link) read pages 31 to 37
http://www.lightandmatter.com/area1book6.html

[David Maes]

ok, i read them when i have more time (i mean not tonight).

Just want to say another thing i think is right.

In the world of low speed (= our world) a particular force which is exercised on a free moving object during a fixed, short time, causes a defined increase of the speed of that object (in the direction of the force). But when the object moves superfast (in special relativity), then it's not like that. The higher the speed of the object, the less that speed will increase. The rest of the energy which is used by the force demonstrates itself as an increase of the mass of the moving object. The energy changes into mass, into matter.

(That's what i believe on this moment, but promise will have a look at the site you say).

(Thanks for the hint).



Greetings,
David.

[dleviwing]

DavidMaes;
An increase in mass does not necessarily mean an increase in the physical quantity of a substance. You really need to understand mass and energy in their physical sence.