Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: disoriented forces

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    1.Which is plus and which is minus? 2.What do the different colours of the arrows mean?
    Either one can be plus or minus. The colored arrows are used to make the distincions for the CCW and CW rotations.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  2. #12
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63

    Re: disoriented forces

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    Either one can be plus or minus. The colored arrows are used to make the distincions for the CCW and CW rotations.
    What do CCW and CW stand for? What is the difference?

  3. #13
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: disoriented forces

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    What do CCW and CW stand for? What is the difference?
    CounterClockWise and ClockWise rotations. They are not topologically equivalent, that is to say not dynamically congruent although geometrically they are.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  4. #14
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63

    Re: disoriented forces

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    CounterClockWise and ClockWise rotations. They are not topologically equivalent, that is to say not dynamically congruent although geometrically they are.
    Oh, now I remember you explained that once. One thing I don't know: 'where' is the mass? Is it between the space-time points, or 'immanent' (like inherent) sort of overlapping with them?

  5. #15
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: disoriented forces

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    'where' is the mass? Is it between the space-time points,
    Using Newton's 2nd law of motion F=ma, m is the inertial mass, m=F/a. But F/a can be expressed as a matrix or Hadamard matrix. Remember, vector division is still not clearly defined in mathematics although in tensor analysis it is possible to divide a tensor by another tensor. Furthermore tensors are represented by matrices and divisions exist if and only if inverses exist.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  6. #16
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63

    Re: disoriented forces

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    Using Newton's 2nd law of motion F=ma, m is the inertial mass, m=F/a. But F/a can be expressed as a matrix or Hadamard matrix. Remember, vector division is still not clearly defined in mathematics although in tensor analysis it is possible to divide a tensor by another tensor. Furthermore tensors are represented by matrices and divisions exist if and only if inverses exist.
    Inverses exist if and only if the matrices are square matrices. And what does itmean that a tensor is represented by a square matrix? I think it is exactly when the tensors are sqaure matrices that they are in space-time, why? Becuase they are square matrices as they are sqaure of energy. Is this correct?

  7. #17
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: disoriented forces

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    Becuase they are square matrices as they are sqaure of energy. Is this correct?
    Only square matrices can mutliply itself and produce itself without creating more topologies ( there are only two and the product is just one of the two, there is no third topology) but the masses appear as scalar factors of the matrices and their numerical values increase in direct proportion to the number of repeated multiplication.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. An Intro to what Supertrings are
    By james l. digol in forum String Theory
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 09-13-2011, 05:38 PM
  2. Forces of Nature : THE SPIN.
    By socratus in forum Forces of Nature
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-29-2006, 10:37 AM
  3. what goes up must come down
    By AntonioLao in forum Cosmology
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-23-2006, 05:29 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top