Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Fundamental Phenomena > Forces of Nature
Reload this Page disoriented forces
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: disoriented forces
Old
  (#11 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
Re: disoriented forces - 05-15-2006, 01:25 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
1.Which is plus and which is minus? 2.What do the different colours of the arrows mean?
Either one can be plus or minus. The colored arrows are used to make the distincions for the CCW and CW rotations.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: disoriented forces
Old
  (#12 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
Re: disoriented forces - 05-15-2006, 01:28 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Either one can be plus or minus. The colored arrows are used to make the distincions for the CCW and CW rotations.
What do CCW and CW stand for? What is the difference?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: disoriented forces
Old
  (#13 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
Re: disoriented forces - 05-15-2006, 01:45 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
What do CCW and CW stand for? What is the difference?
CounterClockWise and ClockWise rotations. They are not topologically equivalent, that is to say not dynamically congruent although geometrically they are.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: disoriented forces
Old
  (#14 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
Re: disoriented forces - 05-15-2006, 01:50 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
CounterClockWise and ClockWise rotations. They are not topologically equivalent, that is to say not dynamically congruent although geometrically they are.
Oh, now I remember you explained that once. One thing I don't know: 'where' is the mass? Is it between the space-time points, or 'immanent' (like inherent) sort of overlapping with them?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: disoriented forces
Old
  (#15 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
Re: disoriented forces - 05-15-2006, 02:04 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
'where' is the mass? Is it between the space-time points,
Using Newton's 2nd law of motion F=ma, m is the inertial mass, m=F/a. But F/a can be expressed as a matrix or Hadamard matrix. Remember, vector division is still not clearly defined in mathematics although in tensor analysis it is possible to divide a tensor by another tensor. Furthermore tensors are represented by matrices and divisions exist if and only if inverses exist.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: disoriented forces
Old
  (#16 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
Re: disoriented forces - 05-15-2006, 02:16 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Using Newton's 2nd law of motion F=ma, m is the inertial mass, m=F/a. But F/a can be expressed as a matrix or Hadamard matrix. Remember, vector division is still not clearly defined in mathematics although in tensor analysis it is possible to divide a tensor by another tensor. Furthermore tensors are represented by matrices and divisions exist if and only if inverses exist.
Inverses exist if and only if the matrices are square matrices. And what does itmean that a tensor is represented by a square matrix? I think it is exactly when the tensors are sqaure matrices that they are in space-time, why? Becuase they are square matrices as they are sqaure of energy. Is this correct?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: disoriented forces
Old
  (#17 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
Re: disoriented forces - 05-15-2006, 02:22 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
Becuase they are square matrices as they are sqaure of energy. Is this correct?
Only square matrices can mutliply itself and produce itself without creating more topologies ( there are only two and the product is just one of the two, there is no third topology) but the masses appear as scalar factors of the matrices and their numerical values increase in direct proportion to the number of repeated multiplication.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An Intro to what Supertrings are james l. digol String Theory 29 07-03-2008 02:07 PM
Forces of Nature : THE SPIN. socratus Forces of Nature 6 08-29-2006 10:37 AM
what goes up must come down AntonioLao Cosmology 4 01-23-2006 05:29 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com