A NEW Theory of Gravity

[c. michael turner]

Hello Professors!

Subject: A wrinkle in the traditional concept of gravity.


The theory of Gravitational wave synchronization.
Gravity is thought traditionally as a pulling together of mass or warping of space that creates mass coming together. I think outside the box and would like your readers to consider a very different view.
I propose the following as a new theory simple.
The very nature of matter is a fundamental process of matter transforming, decaying to its most stable form-space.
Absolute time is governed by the rate of this process. Space is the resulting volume, area. The transformation happens via the gravitational wave. Because the transformation process occurs via wave form time and space are relative when comparing objects with speed. Space is the gravitational wave, the endpoint of matter decaying. The finite but many gravitational waves create an action of synchronization.
Time, space, and Gravitational wave synchronization are three actions of the fundamental process of matter decaying creating space. On your personal scale gravity is gravitational wave synchronization. Your mass is decaying, the earth's mass is decaying, your gravitational waves and the Earth's gravitational waves align via the fundamental process of gravitational wave synchronization which results in gravity. On the grand scale, the Universe is synchronizing by flattening space as all mass is brought into a line and as all mass increases in acceleration via the Newton formula F=M times A. The Universe is transforming into a plucked violin string. The gravitational wave is a monopole wave, all matter is transforming into space and space is transforming into one giant synchronizing energy loosing wave.
Thank you for your time,
Dr. C. Michael Turner, D.D.S., P.A.
Contact at Gravitation@cfl.rr.com

[meg-al]

Where does the decaying mass move when going beyond space. My concept allows for that matter to be swallowed into the obverse realm wherein reside the so-called immaterial. Energies: be they black holes or dark matter subsist beyond the ken of our 3-D and are quite possibly the transforming nutrients and building blocks. You make no allowance for multiple dimensions which would, by their relative nature, skew space (perhaps that would cause gravitation) ~ my theory bridges dualities: our optical 3-D universe which can be compared with the sphericity of our head versus other non optic 'verses and let's compare those unknown dimensions to that of our body; and so the timely bridge is at our neck where the brainstem twists left / right.
If we were a mote on either the universe of the head, or that of the body than we in our perspectual sphericity would not be aware of the other universe's relative integrity because we lacked tangible passage through the mobias strip of the neck ~ and yet either sphericity (head or body) can not exist mutually exclusive, lest the entire hour-glass individual desist .

[mkirkpatrick]

CM Turner an interesting idea and concept you have here,are you suggesting that maybe
gravity is trying to retune the universe to just one basic note?
That when synchronization is complete,gravity will prehaps transmute into something
else??



regards michael.

[c. michael turner]

CM Turner an interesting idea and concept you have here,are you suggesting that maybe
gravity is trying to retune the universe to just one basic note?
That when synchronization is complete,gravity will prehaps transmute into something
else??



regards michael.

I suggest Gravitational wave synchronization is running the Universe. I believe space is -"matter decaying into the gravitational wave". Space is, in my opinion, created by a process that begins as a point of origin mass to energy transfer into wave form, a monopole wave, nonbinding. I believe the force of gravity is directed by gravitational wave distribution through the path of least interference, which I call Gravitational wave synchronization. The result is that space, onto itself, is the controlling factor because its nature has a destiny. Space is an active and changing process of three dimensions decreasing to one. String theory, Ed Witten's M-Theory, Multiple Universe, dark matter were in part created because we could not see how matter worked in three dimensions. It never occured to us the the dimensions of space were changing downward. Once you see it, everything becomes easy to solve, except how did it all begin and what happens the day after time stops!- C. Michael Turner
Thanks for your time.

[mkirkpatrick]

CMTurner,I must say you have aroused my interest in this concept that you have,but
please tell me this;If the universe is changing downwards,are you in effect implying
that the now three dimensions we have,will be,eventually stretched into one?

I await your response.


happy new year btw.

regards michael.

[c. michael turner]

CMTurner,I must say you have aroused my interest in this concept that you have,but
please tell me this;If the universe is changing downwards,are you in effect implying
that the now three dimensions we have,will be,eventually stretched into one?

I await your response.


happy new year btw.

regards michael.

It seems that I am unable to escape that conclusion. The Universe is flatlining, yes.
As matter, including background microwave radiation decreases, space, via the gravitational wave increases. I think that when someday all matter decays to its endpoint- space, time stops being time as we measure it. Will the wave of space continue to lose energy as it continues to synchronize? What will the shape be? A line? a point, will it have an undiscovered property that creates a repeater universe as scientists always want to somehow claim? Heck, first Gravitational wave synchronization has to be discovered, other than deduced by me. And it will take eons before anyone else and they will disguise it in such a way that I won't get any credit and most won't even understand. Relativity can be understood when it is understood that acceleration creates desynchronization between now interfering, matter generating, gravitational wave-fields. It's late and I am babbling, sorry. Bottom line is that Gravitational waves inherently align by bringing seperate matter, that is generating the waves, together through the gravitational wave law of path of least interference. Thought I would make up a new law to explain everything while I'm at it.
Happy New Year, the year of the James bond twins, 2-007's.
Thanks again for your interest in entaining my fun filled adventure of the King Aurther- like quest I chose. I did not look for a theory of everything, I only wanted to know the mechanism that is behind the question, " When I drop stuff, why does it fall?" Turns out to answer that question answers almost everything especially the quote from Einstein... It's late maybe later we'll get to the cliff hanger....,
C. Michael Turner

[mkirkpatrick]

Many thanks CM Turner,look forward to more input into this interesting and most novel
way of stretching out the cosmos.

happy new year,regards michael.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Hello Professors!

Subject: A wrinkle in the traditional concept of gravity.


The theory of Gravitational wave synchronization.
Gravity is thought traditionally as a pulling together of mass or warping of space that creates mass coming together. I think outside the box and would like your readers to consider a very different view.
I propose the following as a new theory simple.
The very nature of matter is a fundamental process of matter transforming, decaying to its most stable form-space.
Absolute time is governed by the rate of this process. Space is the resulting volume, area. The transformation happens via the gravitational wave. Because the transformation process occurs via wave form time and space are relative when comparing objects with speed. Space is the gravitational wave, the endpoint of matter decaying. The finite but many gravitational waves create an action of synchronization.
Time, space, and Gravitational wave synchronization are three actions of the fundamental process of matter decaying creating space. On your personal scale gravity is gravitational wave synchronization. Your mass is decaying, the earth's mass is decaying, your gravitational waves and the Earth's gravitational waves align via the fundamental process of gravitational wave synchronization which results in gravity. On the grand scale, the Universe is synchronizing by flattening space as all mass is brought into a line and as all mass increases in acceleration via the Newton formula F=M times A. The Universe is transforming into a plucked violin string. The gravitational wave is a monopole wave, all matter is transforming into space and space is transforming into one giant synchronizing energy loosing wave.
Thank you for your time,
Dr. C. Michael Turner, D.D.S., P.A.
Contact at Gravitation@cfl.rr.com

Hi CMT, I already mentioned on your other post, that you have some very interesting ideas. Our ideas are very close, so what do you think of filling in the missing pieces with some of this post's points? It's from another area of the forum; Cosmology-Evolution of the Universe:

Re: The Center of the Universe - 12-22-2006, 10:19 PM



And what is there in all this to support there not being a center? And, I did read the article... Any initial center would have long ago vanished due to space/matter curvature of galaxie motions and time, would it not? Einstein did believe in curved space, and I do believe in time erasing such initial motion maps, especially with all the inter-galactic space storms. I see no inconsistencies with center, expanding universe, and the homogeneous, isotropic nature of the universe. We know galaxies collide, as your earlier posts pictures show, so this would mean, over time, the nature of space's motions are multidirectional, at best[thermal space storms?]. Such multidirectionalism would certainly disguise any early big bang motions' center. The thermodynamic dual fields of the aether[my conjecture], that everyone wants to keep ignoring, is very complex. May I point out that the hot quantum angular motion and spin aether field, is impossible of producing the cold linear motion aether field___it, by the laws of physics, must exist in its initial infinite ground macro/micro state, along side, within and without, the hot quantum angular motion and spin aether field, otherwise, the universe would experience heat death. Hot motion cannot produce cold motion, but cold motion must produce hot motion___it's its radiation requirement___all motion radiates heat. Such an initial ground state field requires a center, as its matter motion is thermodynamically required to implode, to just such a center, i.e., big bang from initial infinite space thermal matter motions, to a center. Thermodynamics is, by its very nature, the initially imploding uncaused cause of all matter motion___matter motion must exist eternally, by the first law of thermodynamics___conservation of matter/energy. I think Baud, this is much easier to understand, than the foolishness of the big bang coming from nothing, don't you?

Just imagine the real and most likely conditions at the initial state explosion of a real matter big bang. IMO, it is far from what has been thus far theorized. This was no simple explosion of space and or matter, there would have been no vacuum, at the moment of explosion, as the explosion would have been required to create the finite space vacuum, the temperature outside this dis-equilibriated explosion was most likely absolute zero, the explosion temperture would have most likely been trillions of degrees hotter than what has been theorized, as a practical size of such big bang matter would consist of all the matter, and more, presently in the finite universe, as a considerable sum has radiated away, thus just imagine folding all the universe's galaxies, or at least all their matter, back into one black ball. This would be massive beyond belief, in size, even if we consider an increasing light speed as we go back in time toward the initial event, even though velocity increases mass, and reduces size, it would still have been much more massive than has been so far theorized. Now, consider a many trillions of degrees hot real explosion of real matter, into absolute zero thermal space storms, and the massive initial space storms that such gigantic collisions of matter and energy, in all directions imaginable, would create___this much heat would react so violently against such cold, that it is unimaginable, in our thermal semi-equilibriated universe, to truly comprehend___can you? There would have been massive thunder heads, tornados, hurricanes, twistors, spinors, on and on___unimaginable forces at the initial conditions of such a violent explosion, that it could easily explain all the anomalous multidirections, conditions and spirals of the galactic orders___don't you think? All one needs do is realize how drastic an influence such initial conditions of motions could truly have over time, and I think you can easily see why the initial center would be so disguised, today. Let's put our real thinking caps on, and think about real matter/motion explosions, to try and understand this pragmatically...

Regards,
Lloyd