Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Fundamental Phenomena > Forces of Nature
Reload this Page Gravity is the Property of Space
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Gravity is the Property of Space
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Green Belt
vacuum-mechanics is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Thanks Given: 2
Thanked 13x in 10 Posts
Join Date: May 2004
Rep Power: 16
   
Gravity is the Property of Space - 05-22-2004, 04:53 AM

GRAVITY IS THE PROPERTY OF SPACE

WHAT IS GRAVITY? As far as we know since Sir Isaac Newton time, up to now there is no one knows what gravity is? Where it from or what is is the cause of it? We only know its effect. Anyway, I would like to propose a new idea about gravity. While Einstein said in Geometrodynamics that “gravity is the manifestation of the curvature of space-time” For me “gravity is the property of space” or “space was created out of gravitational energy”.

Based on this concept, vacuum space is neither a blank space nor a space which filled with the old ether. It is “the geometrical structure of vacuum space itself” or it is “the fabric structure of vacuum space” which I will call “vacuum medium”. And indeed we can do an experimental prove for its existence by a simple experiment as below.

The experiment consists of two nearly identical solenoids. One solenoid which has a little smaller in its diameter is inserted in the bigger one. If both solenoids are feed with equal amount of direct currents from two identical power sources, what will happen is as follow; If the two feeding current’s polarity are the same, we will get the magnetic field both inside and outside the solenoids. The appearing magnetic field density generated is twice comparing to one solenoid, which is what it should be.

But when we reverse the polarity of one of the feeding current then the magnetic field generated will disappear. You may say that it is what it should be, yes it is, but where is the generated energy gone? It can not be something like that, because we still feed the same amount of energy into both solenoids. Is it means that we can violate the law of conservation of energy? Of course not, we can not do something like that. The only one sensible explanation is that there is a cancellation of the opposite phase of the twisting stress in the vacuum medium, isn’t it?

How about matters? Based on this concept, matters are condensed of gravitational energy. That why matters are always attract each other. More detail can be found in the paper “Vacuum Mechanics a New Approach to The Theory of Everything” which are presented in http://www.vacuum-mechanics.com . Below are some crucial and interesting points in the paper.

WHAT IS VACUUM MECHANICS? In physics, when we deal with rigid solids, we use mechanics of rigid bodies as the tool. And when dealing with liquids or gases what we used is fluid mechanics. In the same way, we should use “vacuum mechanics” when dealing with vacuum medium. But, what is vacuum medium and how to deal with it? You may think that it is the old ether, which was popular in 19th century. No it is not the ether that filled blank space, it is something more special - it is vacuum space itself. And indeed we can do experimental proves for its existence. So vacuum mechanics is the mechanism of the vacuum medium.

BELIEVE OR NOT! Nowadays, while mobile telephones are familiar to almost of the teenagers in the big city. Engineers or physicists, who involve in the field of radio communication that was used for the mobile telephone to link to each other, they still yet do not know exactly how the radio wave was sent from one to the other telephone set. Einstein’s special relativity had rule out the medium that every kind of wave (such as water wave) is needed to carry it. Fortunately, vacuum mechanics could help them to explain when they were asked by the teenagers. The answer is that the radio waves work by propagation through vacuum medium.

THE NON-DEFECT OF EINSTEIN SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY! Everyone knows that this theory was subjected to many philosophical problems such as the increasing of mass, length contraction and time dilation when an object moving at the velocity approaches the velocity of light. After modification using the concept of vacuum mechanics, all of these defects could be eliminated. So we got a new complete of special theory of relativity.

THE RETURN OF NEWTONIAN CLASSICAL MECHANICS! In modern physics, when a particle such as an electron moving at high velocity compare to the velocity of light. Relativistic mechanics was used to replace the classical one. When vacuum mechanics concept was used to modify and completing special theory of relativity. It turns out that relativistic mechanics is not something new; actually it is classical mechanics plus the effect of vacuodynamics (dynamics of vacuum media). So Newtonian classical mechanics is survived.

THE MORE NATURAL OF EINSTEIN GENERAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY! Space-time concept of general theory of relativity was criticized to be unnatural. How should space-time that has nothing with it, being curved in the vicinity of a massive body? Vacuum medium concept could provide the sensible way for vacuum space. And it is no need that space-time has to be curved, or there is no curved space-time any more.

THE COMPLETE QUANTUM MECHANICAL ENERGY! “No one can understand quantum mechanics”, Richard P. Feyman once said. Indeed, it is the most strange, mysterious and counter-intuitive theory. Surprisingly, after modification and completion by using the concept of vacuum mechanics. It turns out that all difficulty would be gone and returning to a normal theory that everyone could understand.

NO MORE HUNDREDS OF STRANG PARTICLES IN THE ZOO! Nowadays particle physicists facing the problem with the large number and the mysterious of new particles such as neutrino or Higgs field. Armed with the concept of vacuum mechanics, the entire problem could be explained in a more sensible way. Left only with two kind of elementary particles, electron and proton.

THE NON-MISTERIOUS UNIVERSE! The standard model with hot big bang and inflation universe was criticized for violation the law of conservation of energy. When vacuum medium was interpreted as the missing dark matters, the problems seem to be eliminated. And may be it is neither the big bang with inflation for the beginning nor the big crush at the end of the universe.

TWO GREAT THEORIES CAN BE MARRIED NOW! For a long time, modern physicists had tried to merge general theory of relativity with quantum mechanical theory but could not success. In analogy, general theory of relativity is something like water while quantum mechanical theory is sand that is so different. Modifications both of them by using concept of vacuum mechanics making them match to each other like water and sand in the sea of gravitational energy.


--------------------

Last edited by vacuum-mechanics : 12-15-2004 at 10:43 PM. Reason: Improving the article
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Gravity is the Property of Space
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Orange Belt
Rybo is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 36
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: May 2004
Rep Power: 16
   
Re: Gravity is the Property of Space - 05-22-2004, 09:31 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by vacuum-mechanics
What is gravity? This question has been asked since the day of Sir Isaac Newton, one of the greatest scientists in the past. But no one ever knows what is it? Based on the hypothesis of “Vacuum-mechanics”, it is reasonable that gravity should be the ‘property of space’. What follows then is the unification of the basic four forces of the nature, electromagnetic force, weak force, strong force and gravitational force could be done. That is the concept of Theory of Everything, and more details are presenting in “Vacuum mechanics a New Approach to the Theory of Everything”.
VM, Gravity is icosahedral and gravitons are quasi-Euclidean-- curved --3-faced polyhedronsm or as, 6-faced Eucldean polyhedrons tha tcome in clusters of 30, 300, 3000, "30,000", "300,000", or more jsut as quarks come in clusters of two or three.

See http://home.usit.net/~rybo6/rybo/
ybo


Icosahedral gravity is the most spherical regular polyhedron ergo it the highest quasi-physical dimensioning(powering) serving as the intermediate buffer-zone between all that is physical all that is metaphysical.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
In Training
istok is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2004
Rep Power: 0
   
07-30-2004, 03:46 PM

vacuum-mechanics, can u post some links? I would be interested to read that theory.

Rybo, could you please explain your theory in some more "populistic" way? Thanx!
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
Orange Belt
Rybo is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 36
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: May 2004
Rep Power: 16
   
07-30-2004, 10:28 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by istok
vacuum-mechanics, can u post some links? I would be interested to read that theory.

Rybo, could you please explain your theory in some more "populistic" way? Thanx!
VM, I'm not sure what "populist" means. If you have been to my web site then you have the beginners gist of where im coming from.

I thnk EM-Radiation actually becomes gravity ergo it actually travels faster thatn the conventianlly recogniized speed-of -radiation on geodesic pathways rather than on a striaght lin trajectory from point A(electron) to point B(electron).

Even tho it is going faster than conventinal speed of radition it is takin the loger pathwasy so it sarrivla time alwasy appears to us obevers as the speed limit of radiation.

There may be some variation in this hypothsis but that is teh most radical viepoint that I have explored but not ot great mathematical degree. Are you any gooed with math?

The shape of geodesic arcs effects the speed of the maimally dispersed photon only if the faster thatn lradiation speed is a contstant. I this gravity speed is variable then the shape of the arc is irrelavant.

Rybo


Icosahedral gravity is the most spherical regular polyhedron ergo it the highest quasi-physical dimensioning(powering) serving as the intermediate buffer-zone between all that is physical all that is metaphysical.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Yellow Belt
cristian is on a distinguished road
 
cristian's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 16
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rep Power: 0
   
08-17-2004, 05:10 AM

Rybo, I agree with istok, can you explain some of your assumptions in a few phrases, for example who is icosaedral, and what exactly are these pathways, or why would something travel on "geodesic pathways", thanks

There is a challenge from wisp on the General Physics forum: explain you theory there in 100 words or less.

Istok, vacuum-mechanics site is, surprising enough, www.vacuum-mechanics.com . VM, could you also post a trimmed-down version of your theory.

It seems that all external links point to some lengthy description where the author is trying to convince the reader to open their mind to a new approach. We're already open minded here, take us to the good stuff.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
Orange Belt
Rybo is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 36
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: May 2004
Rep Power: 16
   
08-22-2004, 02:21 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by cristian
Rybo, I agree with istok, can you explain some of your assumptions in a few phrases, for example who is icosaedral, and what exactly are these pathways, or why would something travel on "geodesic pathways", thanks
.
Ellie, GUTOE is a quest to unify;
1) spin-2 contractively compressing gravity(monopole?) ergo graviton with,
2) spin-1 expansively radiating electro-magnetic ergo photon and subsequently its relationship to elecrtic charges of postive and negative.

In Euclidean topological geometry there are there three primary stable regular polyhedra;
1) the 4-fold tetrahedron,
2) the 4-fold octahedron, and
3) the 5-fold icosahedron.

All three can be expresed using great circling.

In fermions these Great Circle geodesics are pathways of spin-motion of least resistance. This motion can be left or right at 90 degrees to a central axis and 180 degrees to any, diametrically opposing, spin-motion and produce the charges postive or negative.

My hypothsis, theory whatever, says that all fractional interger(spin) fermions are specifically associated with these geodesic Great Circles of the 4-fold tet and the oct together can be viewed as the 25 Great Circles of the Vector Equlibrium a.k.a. the cubo-octahedron discvoed by Archimedes.

All fermionic Great Cirles are a resultant interactions of 3 sets-- 6 10 and 15 --and total the 31 Great Circles of the Icosahedron with other sets of the 6 10 or 15 Great Circles.

These icosahedrals face bond toether to make a linear beam of icosahedrals as the pathways of a linear transmisson of omnidirectional EM-Radiation.

Gravity, in my judgement, is either the 31 Great Circles or it is only the convex outer surface of these 31 Greact Cirlces.

Oops! I think I may have went over 100 hindred words.

Rybo


Icosahedral gravity is the most spherical regular polyhedron ergo it the highest quasi-physical dimensioning(powering) serving as the intermediate buffer-zone between all that is physical all that is metaphysical.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Yellow Belt
cristian is on a distinguished road
 
cristian's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 16
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rep Power: 0
   
08-23-2004, 07:13 AM

Thanks rybo, I'm afraid I have to leave it to somebody else to comment on your theory (although I can't help to notice that everyone wisely avoids that ). I just don't have that knowledge of physics to tell what's known from what's assumed, or what's lacking from your theory.

Still, another attempt: are you basically saying that particle interactions can be explained by considering them having certain geometric shapes (other than little spheres as people often imagine them) ?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
Orange Belt
Rybo is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 36
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: May 2004
Rep Power: 16
   
08-23-2004, 06:58 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by cristian
Still, another attempt: are you basically saying that particle interactions can be explained by considering them having certain geometric shapes (other than little spheres as people often imagine them) ?
I some, or many, level(s) nobody really knows what is going on at these quatum levels.

We have pictures of gold atoms spelling out IBM. These atom erego atomic electron clouds look reough spherical. Does this mean the structure of the electron is spherical?

Recently Ive been talking with some others more knowledgable than myself about the shape of fermionc atomic or sub-atomic particles and bosonic force particles or there "fileds".

From all these talks and web sites it appears that there are thee conventianlly accepted ways of shaping geoemetically these particles-fields.

1) Spherical is the most diffuclt to calcualatet out and to visually express.

2) linear tube or cylinder which many time is define by also composed with a spiral (See EM-Radiation sine wave-forms in some books)

3) torus(toroidal)a.k.a doughnout shape-- see shape of metal filings of bar magnets field --and in this case we may see a tube/cylinder that comes back to meet itself ergo a torus.

Here is my web site.http://home.usit.net/~rybo6/rybo/

Fundamentally I see four sets of two icosahedrons face bonded togehter. Any one of these sets of two face bonded icosahedrons, I think, also approximate the field of bar magnet shape which, in some reprsentations ive seen, also looks like two spheres face bonded together.

Recently Ive come to some relaizations about the alledged Higgs Ocean(field) that is the alledged bosonic force/partlce that gives mass to all fermions.

The Higgs Ocean is alleged smallest quantum fluctuations of Universe. The planck scale is 10^-35 Higgs quatum fluturations may take place-- operate at --at 10^-36.

So Ellie/Christan, here are is another link to Jim Lehmans PDF file called "The Pandora Spheric" These Pandora polyhedron is a curved version of Buky Fullers Synergetics Vector Equlibrioum whcih is contained within the Isotropic Vector Matrix(IVM) which, ive recently come to believe is the geometry of Higgs Ocean, if, was an equalized i.e. a non-disequilibriuous field.

The discovery of this Pandora, by Jim, unintentionally presented a 3-D version of the hexagonal "Flower of Life" pattern and this curved version more closely approximates the geodesics of fermions and bosons.

I think Jims curved 3-sided "Pods" are gravitons. These are inherently proudced in the curved Higgs field of Pandora, as you can see in Jims PDF.

http://www.blackcatphotoproducts.com/pandora.pdf

Finally Ellie, I want to mention Jims other goemtrical accomplihment. The only know geomectrically rationall commensuration of 4-fold polyhedra with 5-fold polyehedra. Barring the Higgs infor above it is my feeling that all bosons are of 5-fold nature and all fermioons are of a 4-fold nature.

For a few years Jim myseslf and our collaboratiors felt taht if we could unify the 4-fold to the 5-fold we would may have a GUTOE, alas, this Lehman Vector Matrix made visible icoshedral gravity within a 4-fold matrix or vice versa, it did not give us the answeres were looking for without a doubt.

Here is link to Jims commsnration matrix of 4 and 5-fold.
http://www.blackcatphotoproducts.com...ehmanville.JPG

Im sorry if that does not anwere your question Ellie. Im still figuring it out. This is the pathway ive been using.

Lee Smolin of Loop Quatum Gravity(LQG) theories thinks we will be able to QUANTIFY-- not quantisize --gravity within 15 years. In 2006 - 7 there will instrument in space to test if LQG is correct or not.

Unlike string theory, which may never be able to be instrumentally tested.

Rybo


Icosahedral gravity is the most spherical regular polyhedron ergo it the highest quasi-physical dimensioning(powering) serving as the intermediate buffer-zone between all that is physical all that is metaphysical.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Master
michellemfry will become famous soon enough
 
michellemfry's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 620
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 4x in 4 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rep Power: 17
   
Cool 11-29-2005, 11:32 PM

My pea brain wants to think of gravity as the speed of mass period. As simple as the speed of light. Please convince me that I am in reductionist hell and can't get out! I'm tired of looking for simple answers to the universe. I want complexity, and I want it yesterday. Sign me up for the first white hole, please.


Michelle
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fitz'slatest revision of what Force, Space and Time really are in the wave world. Robert Duncan TOE Theories 3 02-18-2008 01:44 AM
Singularity As Separate Entity Mohsen TOE Theory Articles 11 02-08-2008 12:15 PM
Quantum Mechanics Mohsen Physics Articles 5 07-16-2007 07:04 AM
Gravity and space zeroca Forces of Nature 65 06-17-2007 12:26 AM
The Mathematico-Cognition Reality Theory (MCRT) mjgeddes TOE Theory Articles 11 02-10-2006 09:08 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com