"...modified gravity theory, nor the Dark Matter theory, as they are formulated today, will solve all the problems of galactic dynamics or cosmology. The truth could in principle lie in between, but it is very plausible that we are missing something fundamental about gravity, and that a radically new theoretical approach will be needed to solve all these problems..."
About PPARC
Id 2607: For more information about this page contact
Julia Maddock. Last updated
20 February 2006 at 10:32
This fragment was published on the home page of TOEQUEST. I took the liberty to quote this specific part as an introduction of my views about gravity.
Gravity is about the influence of stars and group of them over the rest of the cosmos. The existence or presence of what we have named "gravity" is not a physical property of planets, moon or asteroids and meteorites [non-radiating bodies]. Planets do not exert any force between them at all, instead they are forced to move, rotate or spin accordingly to a set of orbits previously determined by stars [suns].
A purely quantum mechanical process [in my opinion] is the sole responsible for those orbits where planets are found at any moment in time. I wrote [and published too] all about this 2 years ago in my "fictional book" that I titled "Warning Scientific Discretion Advised." I proposed no formulas or equations since I am not a scientists, but the physical image of what's going on was pretty well explained in it.
I would suggest to all of you to read the article posted by Robert on the front page about the so-called "improved Einstein's theory of gravity" I am for those who believe that the answer rests between both concepts. It is true that [on one hand] gravity is not behaving the same way across the galaxies. On the other hand, I am PRO on that the answer to gravity is non of the above!
Think of this for a second! Our solar system is at some given place in the universe, but there are others too SPINNING around some center we can not pin-point with entire exactitude... not yet. It's just like the structure of the atom. At different distance from the very core of each atom we may found a spectrum of harmonics [we consider to be "wavicles" or "elemental particles" instead of pure energy levels]. As I wrote here before, I believe that time or space-time "runs" at different rate in direct proportionality with the density of those harmonics.
In English I said that the actual time [as a rate of change after being measured inside a specific frame] suffers a small change from one harmonic to the next. If Einstein saw time linked to gravity more than 100 years ago I don't find particulary contradicting the fact that gravity is DIFFERENT as we MOVE across the cosmos from one place to the other.
Think about it!
HUMANBYDEFAULT [EXCELLENT ARTICLE BY THE WAY!]
Linear Mode
