Gravity is a force that pushes down on matter and results from a compressional force acting inwards due to density variation in the ether. See http://www.kevin.harkess.btinternet.co.uk and go to gravity.
wisp
- particles of nothingness
Gravity is a force that pushes down on matter and results from a compressional force acting inwards due to density variation in the ether. See http://www.kevin.harkess.btinternet.co.uk and go to gravity.
wisp
- particles of nothingness
What are "density variations in the ether"? What is their origin? What is their relationship/connection to matter?
Hi ?Elite
What we think of as empty space is in fact densely packed ether (tiny spheres called wisps). They are stacked together in such a way that the gaps between the spheres are minimal, and so empty space has the maximum density.
When a hole is made in the ether, the surrounding ether forms into a circular symmetry pattern and the ether density is reduced.
The hole is what causes “matter” to form in the ether. The pattern that forms around the hole is a type of 3-dimensional fractal (matter-fractal).
After developing this idea (wisp theory) I discovered that the cause of gravity is almost the same as that suggested 300 years earlier by Isaac Newton. He believed that variation in ether density caused the gravitational effect (Query 31 Optiks 1704).
wisp
-particles of nothingness
Sorry, it was query 21
In Query 21, Newton wrote on the subject of an ethereal medium link with gravity.
Is not this Medium much rarer within the dense Bodies of the Sun, Stars, Planets and Comets, than in the empty celestial Spaces between them? And in passing from them to great distances, doth it not grow denser and denser perpetually, and thereby cause the gravity of those great Bodies towards one another, and of their parts towards the Bodies; every Body endeavouring to go from the denser parts of the Medium towards the rarer?
wisp
-particles of nothingness
Respect to all scientist who have done so much hard work in searching for the answers to everything...this has actually laid the ground work for my own TOE... sad to say however many of their theories are incorrect.
The theory of 'ether' cannot explain EVERYTHING and so it will always be subject to criticism.
I however have a true TOE ie explaining EVERYTHING in one shot. If anyone is interested they may so indicate in this forum.
Your Friendly Physicist, ThirdWorld.
Hi ThirdWorld
The normal perception of the ether is something like an invisible fluid medium through which matter moves. But it's different than that, it's harder than steel and locked together by powerful bonding force, and matter as we know it forms because of holes in this new ether. This new ether solves many mysteries of science and may possible explain the TOE."The theory of 'ether' cannot explain EVERYTHING and so it will always be subject to criticism. "
I would like to hear your own ideas on your theory. Science needs new ideas to move forward.
wisp
-particles of nothingness
Hi Wisp,
The information on ether you posted seems very cloudy to me: you use expressions such as 'perception of ether' and 'something like a ...fluid' which convey an idea of uncertainty as to what this substance really is.
Further, there is a cotradiction of terms here: '...invisible fluid...harder than steel'. If it is fluid it can readily be distorted, if it is hard it cannot readily be distorted. So which is it???
My TOE gives down to detailed drawings of my fundamental particle.
Now you say "science needs new ideas..." but where can I find this entity called "science"? I have been trying to get my TOE to this entity but I cannot locate it...can you help me?
Your Friendly Physicist, ThirdWorld.
In regards to ether, I think wisp was contrasting the typical view one usually has of ether with his own view. So there is no contradiction here. Wisp has an excellent description of his Wisp Unification Theory here.
As you are probably noticing, science tends to shut out new ideas if they are much different from accepted paradigms. There is an excellent book written on this very topic that you might find helpful. Its titled, "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" by Thomas S. Kuhn. It probably identifies many of the problems you are experiencing.
I disagree. Gravity is pulling force that creates all resultan pushing forces of Universe.Originally Posted by wisp
Rybo
Icosahedral gravity is the most spherical regular polyhedron ergo it the highest quasi-physical dimensioning(powering) serving as the intermediate buffer-zone between all that is physical all that is metaphysical.
The General Theory of Relativity is a geometrical interpretation of gravity not a force interpretation that Newton proposed. The proper name for the General Theory is Geometrodynamics which describes dynamics on a curved surface. So you could say that, in this theory at least, gravity is not a force at all. That is the genius of Albert Einstein.
DWB
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)