| | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 48 |
11-08-2005, 04:50 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Macroscopic phenomena seem to go into cycles: life and death, night and day, the seasons, but in the microscopic world, cycles do not exist: matter predominate over antimatter, all neutrinos are left-handed, time flows in one direction, etc. | I believe that is due to the generalization that occurs in the growth of terms. The term day, for example, is much bigger than the term neutrinos, not due to the size, or how many things it affects, or how general it is as definition, but bigger in the sense of size from which it is seen. Anyway, if you see, female-male, life-death, day-night, etc, are not of the macro world, they are of the middle world. The macro world is that of cosmology and macro universes. And, I believe, in this macro scale things are just like the macro scale, more of one than equality. For example, there is more space inside the universe than outside (if at all outside), there are more curved universes than flat, there is more loss or more gain of energy (depending on each universe), than the opposite...So, in micro it's extreme to one side, in middle it's centre, and in macro it's extreme the opposite site. This is a simple concept.
Last edited by zeroca : 02-12-2006 at 10:22 AM.
Reason: Just adjusting the spelling of some words without change of anything else.
| |
|  | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80 | cycles and more cycles -
11-08-2005, 09:18 PM
Day cycle for earth is about 24 hours gives us sleep cycle. Planetary cycles, for earth it is about 365 days. Sunspot cycle is about 11 years. Halley comet returns about every 75 years. Cicada cycle every 17 years. Don't know about the universe cycle?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
Last edited by zeroca : 02-12-2006 at 10:25 AM.
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 98 |  all is within a cycle except the All which is cycle-less. -
11-08-2005, 09:54 PM
The universe is within a cycle, the cycle of outbreathing, which lasts for eons,
the number is fixed. It begins with a one and ends with a naught! The number can
be found if you look in the Bhagavad-Gita, then there is the inbreathing, withdrawing, into obscuration, and back into un-manifestation, until the next outbreathing. Our genetic code is locked into a cycle. And when each criteria is criteria, a chemical secretion via the pineal gland will unlock the next
sequence for its Charge! This could even be an awaking memory, or just a
new understanding of things? Like time lapse photography chromosomes within
us are lapsed in time! Awaiting a Crisis to occur, then this will often trigger a
response from the pineal gland, and a chemically encoded message will be sent
to chromosomes to unlock!
Kind regards, Michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Last edited by zeroca : 02-12-2006 at 10:35 AM.
| |
| | | | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 48 |
11-09-2005, 02:14 AM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Day cycle for earth is about 24 hours gives us sleep cycle. Planetary cycles, for earth it is about 365 days. Sunspot cycle is about 11 years. Halley comet returns about every 75 years. Cicada cycle every 17 years. Don't know about the universe cycle? | What do you mean by this, the movement of the universe around whatever bigger is outside, or the universe of all the galaxies around the universe? If it is the movement of the universe as a whole, then it's stupid to think that. Time, space, gravity, matter exist inside this universe, we don't even know if it exists at all in other universe, or even if the universes exist, or, even being more exact, we can't be sure that these properties exist in our universe, or even that our universe exists. But as gravity only exists inside the universe, it can't be between universes. Time, or space, or matter...
Last edited by zeroca : 02-12-2006 at 10:40 AM.
| |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80 | expansion and contraction -
11-09-2005, 12:51 PM
Cosmologists say the universe is expanding (moving forward to the future and forward in time). This expansion is in exact opposition to the force of gravity. If the universe has a cycle then eventually it must contract (moving backward in time and dominated 100% by gravity) and then starting another expansion on and on.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
Last edited by zeroca : 02-12-2006 at 10:44 AM.
| |
| | | | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 48 |
11-11-2005, 01:34 PM
Antonio,
Will the speed of contraction be equal to the speed of expansion?
I believe not, because as it contracts, the black holes and galaxies will eat each other, and that will accelerate the process. What about you?
Last edited by zeroca : 02-12-2006 at 10:46 AM.
| |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80 | Hubble's constant -
11-11-2005, 03:02 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE Will the speed of contraction be equal to the speed of expansion? | Would assumed that its reverse linearity of Hubble’s constant? That is ignoring Guth's variable inflations.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
Last edited by zeroca : 02-12-2006 at 10:49 AM.
| |
| | | | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 48 |
11-11-2005, 03:16 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Guth's variable inflations. | Which states that?....
Last edited by zeroca : 02-20-2006 at 02:31 AM.
| |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80 | Guth theory of inflations -
11-11-2005, 03:30 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE Which states that?.... | the following site describes some of Alan Guth's inflationary theory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_inflation
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
| |
| | | | | | Master
Status: Offline Posts: 620
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 4x in 4 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2005 Rep Power: 17 | 
12-31-2005, 01:32 AM
Doesn't the base pairing have something to do with unzipping? | |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com | |
